4/20/13

more stupid questions

UPDATE: 4/26/13
Living very near Boston, we have heard and read many things over the past few days. Things which do not add up. News from people we know about people in the hospital with serious injuries. And yet, we cannot find any videos or photos from the incident -- thus far -- to indicate where these other people were located at the time of the explosions.

Given that the goal of the social engineers is to divide society, we see their hand at work. We understand they don't care about killing and maiming people, as obviously they do that all the time. But dividing society is another issue. They really want to divide the people in America. That's where the social engineers have had to get extra creative. Just killing Americans with Muslim terrorist brothers is more of a uniting thing for many Americans, and they don't want us united. In order to make it a Win Win Divide Bonanza, they have to do something a little different. Maybe throw in some fake perps, shopped photos, real photos, fake victims, real victims, the first bomb, the second bomb... and so on. Mix it all together. Hide things that would clear up confusion. Make it so everyone can see whatever they want to see. Make it chaos.

It is quite diabolical. It allows for half truths, and mistakes, and instances of human error, both genuine and phony, to come into play. It facilitates a lot of disagreements and diversions about technical issues, and moral issues, and logic.

Does it matter if people died and were maimed, or not? How could it not matter? To our mind, it makes all the difference in the world. For one thing it's the difference between life and death -- always important. For another thing it's the difference between truth and lies -- also always important. We don't like being lied to. So it matters to us.

To anyone who thinks it doesn't matter whether people died or not, we suggest you go ahead into the next barroom and announce that you think it was all fake, and see what happens. You'll see that it matters very much to people, and that you are now a social outcast, and probably dangerous and crazy as well.


We understand the nuance that the social engineers don't personally give a shit whether people die or not, but everything they do is to manipulate the audience. It's not important what they think, because we already know what they think. It's more important to understand what they want us to think. And they understand that we are already divided, which they worked very hard at, and now they want to drive the final wedge in there and break off the dangerous piece and send us off to die like a polar bear trapped on a chunk of ice in a global warming sea of doom. And that is why, instead of simply killing people straight out, they make everything lately into an extra-complicated mindfuck, followed in a few days by a fresh one.

So is it worth reviewing the "performance" to tease apart the real from the fake? Well it certainly is not easy, and it may be a waste of time in the end, but yes of course it is worth doing. The truth is always worth pursuing.

We appreciate all the comments to this post, especially from my dear friend James, who has never failed to support me in trying to understand the events around us.

Comments are closed.

~ Peasant

 

UPDATE: My comment on the latest discoveries in comments:
Recap...
Homeland Preparedness / Medical Reserve Corp is part of DHS. (The people with the white Adidas jackets.)

The NY Daily News admits to doctoring photos.

There are remarkably only a handful of photos of a few of the victims for everyone to analyze, causing no end to the chaos. Remarkably, there are no photos of the dozens of other victims. Remarkably, photographers are perched on the walkway above the finish line, with excellent cameras, and can be seen after the explosions standing there.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/hahatango/8652916959/in/set-72157633252445135/lightbox/

A guy who looks exactly like steven spielberg now turns up in a picture. (with white Adidas coat)

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2013/04/15/us/20130416-BOSTON-slide-9010/20130416-BOSTON-slide-9010-hpLarge-v2.jpg

The same guy is also seen in the hahatango photostream DSC03171, please look before it disappears:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/hahatango/8654021280/in/set-72157633252445135/lightbox/

Hmm. Occam's Razor. Maybe the guy who looks exactly like spielberg is, you know, spielberg. Maybe, if they were trying to do something really risky, like pull a big stunt off live, kind of like one of those flash mob things, maybe the big boss himself would say, Hey guys, don't worry I will be there myself to direct.??

It's risky yeah but don't worry, because if even if people SEE ME, or take pictures of me, they won't believe their own eyes.

I mean he could have just been there watching the marathon with a white Adidas jacket on hours after the winners finished, right? Or he could be just some guy who looks exactly like spielberg, right? Or it could be photoshopped in for some unknown inexplicable reason, like a trap for conspiracy theorists? Except he does show up in the group pics. Or... what is the explanation? How many flaming hulahoops can we jump through to explain this?

Or, alternatively, he was there doing his job.

*******

This is an interesting photo stream.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/hahatango/sets/72157633252445135/with/8652864053/

We see a few people on the ground immediately after the blast. Eventually many people are swarmed around the area. Lots of empty wheelchairs are being pushed around.

Where are the victims being removed from the scene, in this photo stream? We are talking about reconciling the "iconic" images we have all seen to this photo stream.

We missed the part where the guy in the cowboy hat, for instance, lifts Jeff Bauman into a wheelchair and runs off down the street with him.

Image DSC03186 shows dozens of people at the scene. Two frames later... everyone is gone.

Crazy.

More here...

http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?p=2383138&sid=2669e2af1afc50a03a4ab198dae587c3

Also here, an excellent unpacking. h/t Kenny


If you loose both your legs from explosive trauma half your blood is gone in one minute via the femoral arteries, youre dead after two. Bleeding out is worse with blunt force trauma (like shrapnel) because flesh is torn rather than cut, exposing more arterial and vascular tissue. The human body holds 5 to 6 LITERS of blood. If that really happened you would see blood EVERYWHERE, the guy would be drenched in it. You would also see what's called arterial spurtting from the injury. Most likely he would vomit after turning ghost white from shock, then turning delirious or passing out. As for the "tourniquet"...
More great info, h/t A13:

http://cotocrew.wordpress.com/2013/04/20/smoking-gun-that-boston-marathon-bombing-was-staged/


4/18/13

confusion factor 2

Sorry for the confusion. We did put a post up yesterday but took it down after an hour or so, because no sooner had we posted than we had doubts and did not want to make for more confusion. [forehead slap] This is what comes from rushing and using someone else's laptop and not having enough time to do things properly.

The gist of our post was that one of the bombs may have been inside the building at 699 Boylston, based on our view that the Lenscrafter windows were blown out not in. But then, it could be that the bomb was on the sidewalk and the blast was directed more sideways along the face of the building. We just don't know. This is the kind of analysis that others are better qualified to make, and as more pictures come out showing where the injured were standing, perhaps that will become clearer. However it would still bear looking into who owns the building and we did happen to note that the location there at 699 Boylston has appeared on city documents looking to redo the storefronts and lobby entrance. The owner is One Exeter Plaza, LLC. 

http://www.cityofboston.gov/Images_Documents/BBAC%20Agenda%20November%202012_tcm3-34543.pdf

More recent:

http://www.cityofboston.gov/Images_Documents/BBAC%20Agenda%20April%202013_tcm3-37233.pdf

More information here (page 3). Evidently this building is informally called the "darth vader" building. Charming.

January 2012, the building sold for $112M, purchased by AEW Capital Management, LP.

One Exeter Plaza at Boylston and Exeter streets is 85 percent leased and its tenants include Cornerstone Research, Riverside Partners, International Data Group, Wells Fargo/Wachovia, Bank of America and Morton’s Restaurant.


Does it mean anything? We don't know. Just curious. Just looking around. Looking at pics, looking. We do think there is plenty of confusion created by having two bombs, as it will become very easy for people to make innocent mistakes which then allows other people to browbeat them. It also allows people to throw out red herrings which are then used to disparage people honestly engaged in trying to figure out what happened.

We know all people of goodwill want the perpetrators to be caught. However if the EVIDENCE points to the perpetrators being People In Position Of Authority, this puts some people of good will into a State of Cognitive Dissonance, and then they turn on the people pointing out the Unfortunate Evidence. And then the perpetrators get away with it and laugh into their palms. We have seen this movie a few times.

So we are here but mainly watching and reading with you, dear friends. Watching the gatekeepers also. And hoping that this time, for once, things will unfold just so, and the evil and their minions will accidentally impale themselves on the city of Boston. There would be a lot of justice in that sequence.

The resistance begins in your mind.


legal mumbo jumbo

Disclaimer: The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.

Fair Use: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.