Now that fake narratives are unravelling in earnest, we await John Ratcliffe to show us what it means to direct the CIA ... home of many plots, and people who lie for a living.
Ratcliffe has important connections to Bill Browder, infamous ringleader of the Magnitsky Act -- our favorite overreaching geopolitical stunt that got away. If we could look up "Russia Bad" in the Deep State Narrative Encyclopedia, Browder's face would be next to it. Browder OWNS the ice age we've lived through with Russia these past fifteen years. And when the Magnitsky case was brand new in 2009, Browder hired Ashcroft, Sutton and Ratcliffe.
Be still my heart.
As a matter of fact, Ashcroft, Sutton and Ratcliffe helped write the Magnitsky Act.
What could this mean, friends?
John Ashcroft
The demoralization campaign against everything we love has been profound, relentless, suffocating. WE KNOW the Deep State could never be defeated without the sacrifices of GOOD PEOPLE who went down in there and wrestled these pigs in the mud. We thank these brave ladies and gentlemen for their service to humanity. God will surely wash his faithful clean from the filth of doing this work.
So when Ratcliffe became DNI, alarms went off because of Ratcliffe's connection to the Russia Collusion narrative: namely, the meeting between Natalia Veselnitskaya and Donald Trump, Jr., Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafort. The meeting happened at Trump Tower in JUNE 2016, if you recall; and it supposedly meant that Team Trump was dallying with corrupt Russian officials, including those responsible for the death in jail of Bill Browder's accountant (not lawyer), Sergei Magnitsky.
What is Ratcliffe's connection to "Russia Collusion"? He knows the detailed origins of Browder's NARRATIVE.
Natalia Veselnitskaya also knows the details of Browder's NARRATIVE.
Ratcliffe and Veselnitskaya know that Browder's NARRATIVE will collapse under scrutiny. Therefore, the deep state would not want these two camps ever getting close enough to compare notes. The deep state had to torpedo this meeting, and they used their British asset, Rob Goldstone, to do it.
According to Veselnitskaya's testimony:
- She requested "support for the upcoming June 14, 2016 Congress hearing in the House Subcommittee on Europe, Eurasia and Emerging Threats." (page 30)
- She introduced herself as a lawyer representing the interests of her client. (page 33)
- She also acted as a consultant for HRAGIF, formed "to resume adoption of Russian orphans by Americans, which had become impossible because of the intense lobbying campaign by Browder resulted in passing the Magnitsky Act which undermined all relations between our countries." (page 33)
But but but Veselnitskaya has connections to Russian government officials? Well perhaps that's because Browder -- the convicted criminal -- accused her client of laundering stolen money into New York real estate. She has worked with the Russian government investigators DOING THEIR JOBS INVESTIGATING TAX FRAUD in the course of DOING HER JOB DEFENDING HER CLIENT, Denys Katsyv. You know... people working for a living?
The meeting ended. The only importance the public heard was "PROOF" that Team Trump was colluding with Russia. Importantly, after being dragged into the spotlight VIA THE MUD, Natalia Veselnitskaya testified before Congress and got her story on the record. Predictably, journalists refused to tell the public what she said.
https://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/russlandaffaere-anwaeltin-natalia-veselnitskaya-zweifelt-robert-mueller-an-a-1204229.html
Maybe since she testified before the US Senate Intelligence Committee in BERLIN, GERMANY, reporters have a Good Excuse to remain innocent of knowledge for eight years?
HERE is Natalia Veselnitskaya's testimony on 11/20/2017. For those who LOVE THE TRUTH.
My information related to criminal actions by a tax fraudster convicted in my country [Russia - ed.], Browder, whose crimes created a money trail leading to New York. And in order to deny expected future charges both in Russia and in the United States, these people came up with an unprecedented shield using tragedy and death of an individual whom Browder never actually met - the Magnitsky Act. Since 2008, all the years of anti-Russian sentiments lobbying, in simple words, rousing hatred towards Russians and Russia led to the adoption of this Act, named after an individual whose story had never been independently and professionally verified in the United States. Using the "doctrine of dirty hands and words" Browder's group managed to stifle freedom of speech, with the help of current and former officials, Congress and Senate aids, US Department of State staff members. A criminal, who renounced his US citizenship due to unwillingness to pay taxes from his offshore income, but continuing to live in the United States without paying a penny of tax, was provided an unprecedented protection from the entire US government machine against the purported "common enemy." (page 45)
^^^^^^^
Hillary Clinton was neck deep in the Magnitsky Act. As Secretary of State, she and Tim Geithner approved the list of sanctioned Russians. Previously, she was neck deep in an orphan scandal.
Remember Haiti, Laura Silsby, and Jorge Puello? When they got stuck trying to travel with some orphaned Haitian children after the horrible earthquake? And then the children turned out to not even be orphans? And people started noticing things and then Hillary Clinton personally intervened and got Laura Silsby out of hot water, a week before Super Bowl Sunday? Meanwhile the Israelis flew into Haiti and set up the fastest MASH field hospital of all time, outwitting disaster recovery bottlenecks that stumped every other country, so they could help the poor Haitians? And then Gal Lusky of Israel Flying Aid was also heroically feeding the orphans and looking to set up an orphanage?
For whatever reasons, when Russia responded to the Magnitsky Act, they put some prominent Americans on a list (from the White House, SDNY, DOJ, US Military, DEA); and they also halted adoptions of Russian children by US citizens.
Consider why the USA might be an orphan destination, and consider why Russia might want to stop that.
Jonathan Easley and John Solomon write in The Hill on 7/14/17, about a year after the Trump Tower meeting.
From the article we learn:- Prevezon settled the case for $5.9M in May 2017.
- One Hill staffer described the anti-Magnitsky lobbying effort as "extremely expensive, well-resourced and aggressive."
- Akhmetshin and Arakelian would stalk the halls to pressure lawmakers to undo the Magnitsky Act.
- People targeted included: Gregory Meeks (D-NY), Eliot Engel (D-NY), French Hill (R-AK), Jim McGovern (D-MA)
- Meeks met frequently with Browder.
- The lawmakers did not succumb to the pressure.
- The purpose of all this lobbying was reportedly to reinstate the ability of US citizens to adopt Russian children. And in order to do that the Magnitsky Act needed to be repealed, because:
"The two issues were inextricably linked since the U.S. law was passed by a bipartisan majority in Congress in 2012 and signed by former President Obama."
Comments