Fred's brother

We want to quickly revisit the Poppo / Eugene narrative to note a bit of "progression" in the story.

You may recall that one of the holes in the narrative was the mysterious friend that Eugene went to meet just before he magically turned into a cannibal zombie...?

"Eugene’s on-again, off-again girlfriend said he woke her up at 5:30 a.m. to say he was going to meet with a “homeboy.” She said she found it strange he was rummaging the closet so early in morning. He didn’t name the friend or say where he was going." http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/05/30/2824778/girlfriend-face-eating-man-was.html

The friend is mentioned in many stories but not named. Just glossed right over.

Well, now we know, well, sort of. We know his BROTHER, Fred.

Also, they tell us the crime may not have been random, that Eugene "KNEW" his victim, according to Fred, who remembers. They met Poppo once before. It was random *that* time, but probably not *this* time. That seems to be the suggestion.


"Rudy Eugene, 31, who was killed by police during the gruesome mauling, randomly encountered Ronald Poppo while doing community work handing out meals to the homeless a few years ago, a friend of Eugene’s told The Miami Herald.
“Poppo seemed like a nice and kind man,” said Fredric Christian, 34, who claimed to have been with Eugene at the time. “I remember when we gave him food.”
There were also reports of ripped Bible verses found near Eugene’s lifeless body. It's not unheard of for religious delusions to play a part in schizophrenic behavior, said forensic psychologist Dr. Wade Silverman."

Christian said, "I remember when we gave him food." Hahaha, Matthew 25:35? Teachings of Jesus Christ?  For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in,.... DO THESE CLOWNS LIKE TO LAY IT ON THICK, OR WHAT?

And sudden new details! Ripped pages out of Eugene's bible, at the scene of the crime, just steps away?? So strange that we didn't hear or read a peep about this way back when it happened. We wonder where was his secret pocket that he kept his bible while he was stripped naked and swinging from the lamppost? Or did he put it down, swing from the lamppost, and then pick it up again before traveling on? That would be really weird, huh?

Anyway, the friend, Fred, told all this to the Miami Herald, which is of course the "news" organization that filmed the entire incident from the rooftop security camera, so you can trust them. And everyone else is just piggybacking off that Miami Herald story and running this "news" and getting this religious delusion whack-job angle out there. You know, Eugene met this homeless guy Poppo years ago at a shelter, gave him food, and he recognized his face while in the midst of his religious delusion cannibal zombie bath salts state of insanity, and that's why he must have stared at him so hard while crouching over him, before ripping his face apart with his teeth....? He was RECOGNIZING him, see? Remembering when he gave him food. And something snapped inside his religiously deluded head? And not sure when he ripped the bible up but we don't recall seeing any of that on the video. But the pages were reportedly nearby so it must have happened. Anyway, the narrative suggestion being that it is no longer a "random" crime but now a religious delusion type of crime. CHECK. That all hangs together for you right? It has all been "revealed." He must have been possessed.

REVEALED: Miami cannibal Rudy Eugene had met his victim before horrifying attack

Here's the Miami Herald story, the source for all this echo chamber revelation.


"The brutal details of his attack on a homeless man, the roaring headlines, the whispers of Vodou or demonic possession, all conspired against Charles, who simply wanted to bury her son with a proper church service and then return to a quiet, anonymous life with a fiancé and two younger sons. The first church said no, followed by the second. The third said yes then backed out. Same for the fourth church."

Poor lady couldn't get the churches to bury her son. That's so... Christian.... of them? They seem rather superstitious over a dead man's body. And not very Christian to deprive his mother of the comfort of a Christian burial.

"As friends and family try to piece together Eugene’s final hours, a few of the gaps have been filled in. The evening before the attack, Christian, Eugene’s longtime friend, said a troubled Eugene came over to visit Christian’s brother.
“My brother said Rudy didn’t look right,’’ Christian said. “[Eugene] said he needed to talk to [my brother] about something but never got a chance to say what it was.”
The next morning, Cross said, Eugene was up about 5 a.m. scouring their closet for something, leaving heaps of clothing strewn across the room. He kissed Cross on the lips and walked out the door carrying his King James Bible and a brown book he used to jot down scriptures."

Just noting more inconsistencies for the record. This guy Fredric Christian, Eugene's long time friend, was not actually the "friend" that Eugene went to see, no that was his brother. Eugene came to see his longtime friend's (Fred's) brother. Check. No name for this guy, Fred's brother. IT'S NOT IMPORTANT. Nor are any other details, seemingly. The story just morphs and changes from "new" outlet to "news" outlet, with all sorts of screwy things thrown in there, just appearing willy nilly like ripped out bible pages floating around all of a sudden, weeks later, so you don't really know. The more confusing details the better.

But, obviously, Fred Christian is now an important witness to these new developments in the narrative, so we should make sure he has credibility before we start pumping this narrative around, right? We are taking his word for it that Eugene met Poppo before and that Eugene met with Fred's brother just before having his religious delusion cannibal zombie attack?



kingpin taken out - updated

UPDATES at the bottom.


Voltaire Network reports that newly appointed head of Saudi intelligence Bandar Bush has been eliminated by Syria in retaliation for the July 18 attack that took out several Syrian generals. http://www.voltairenet.org/Syria-eliminates-Bandar-bin-Sultan "Though not yet announced by the Saudi authorities, the death of Prince Bandar bin Sultan bin Abdulaziz Al Saud has been confirmed to Voltaire Network unofficially.".... "His death constitutes a serious blow to the whole system of Western covert action in the Muslim world. It took Syria only eight days to mount this spectacular reprisal operation." A HUGE blow delivered by Syria. Wow. Stunning news. We wonder how Team NATO will spin it.

UPDATE: For some context...

This reportedly occurred July 26. Still no announcement. Must be a HUGE embarrassment and disappointment, given the gloating over his appointment.

7/12/12: Prince Bandar bin Sultan (Bandar Bush) named new Saudi intelligence chief


This could be a sign of things to come in Syria given the fact that he was instrumental in running the anti-Soviet Afghan war in the 80s. He is also very aggressive and a hawk in the Saudi establishment but also very close the US establishment.
The previous person Muqrin had a softer approach on most issues.

...For Saudis and Westerners who remember Prince Bandar as a driving force rallying international support and procuring weapons for Muslim fighters seeking to push Soviet forces from Afghanistan in the 1980s, the appointment was a sign that the Saudis might play a more influential role as uprisings that may remake the Arab world, especially in Syria.
"In these very hectic moments for Saudi foreign policy…we need Bandar bin Sultan," said Abdullah al-Shammri, a political analyst. "He's a volcano, and we need a volcano at this moment."
Mr. al-Shammri cited what he called Prince Bandar's "special relationship" with American officials. He also mentioned parallels between the U.S. and Saudi Arabia working together in the 1980s against the Soviets in Afghanistan, and current circumstances in Syria, where the U.S., Saudi Arabia and others are trying to overcome Russian objections to tougher action against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's regime.

UPDATED 7/31/12: Still waiting for announcements.... clock is ticking....

Appointment announced 7/19/20:


"In an unexpected royal move, an order was issued by King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia yesterday [July 19] removing Prince Muqrin Bin-Abd-al-Aziz from his post as head of the General Intelligence Directorate (GID) and appointing Prince Bandar Bin-Sultan as his successor."

This link found at Penny's is important for establishing the timeline:


Sunday 22 July 2012 12:52

"Blast hits Saudi intelligence building, killing deputy spy chief
Islam Times - A blast has hit the builing of Saudi intelligence service in Riyadh, killing deputy of the newly-appointed intelligence chief Prince Bandar bin Sultan, according to reports.
The explosion took place on Sunday when Bin Sultan’s deputy was entering the building, Yemen's al-Fajr Press quoted eyewitnesses as saying.

Saudi media have so far refrained from showing any reaction to the blast."

So we have a hit on the Syrians on 7/18, killing multiple generals, the next day Bandar's surprise appointment, and three days later a successful hit on him in front of the Saudi intelligence building. Bandar dies a few days later, 7/26. STILL NO OFFICIAL ANNOUNCEMENT, 7/31.

Let's be clear. On 7/20/12, The Jewish Week has an article titled: Bandar Bush Rides Again.

"His Washington connections – including with Jewish members of Congress --  and experience suggest his surprise appointment was intended to strengthen US-Saudi relations following disagreements over responses to last year's Arab uprisings.
A former jet fighter pilot with a preference for Cuban cigars, the Dallas Cowboys and the good life, Bandar, 63, is considered the regime's leading hawk and a strong supporter of the Syrian rebels trying to overthrow Bashar Assad. He is said to favor arming the rebels, which Saudi Arabia and Qatar are doing already.
David Ottaway, his biographer and a senior scholar at the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington, said Bandar is "just the right person for the right time in Saudi.""

Does The Jewish Week sound upset that Bandar is Riding Again? No. This is The Jewish Week quietly rubbing its hands together in anticipation of the rebels tearing Syria apart.

Thoughts, instincts on this: Certainly Bandar would have many enemies, many people who would like to see him dead. However, which ones would be able to deliver? Who has that kind of intelligence capability?

No announcement in the controlled media. Who controls the media? This indicates that they are still figuring out how to spin this. Because if it was pre-planned and delivered by the people who control the media, they would have had their story ready to go from Day One. Instead no story, Day Nine....? Houston we have a problem. How are they going to get in front of this narrative now, all these days later? They're not. It's all over the internets already. They have a big problem. Not only did they get a nasty surprise that they did not anticipate, from a corner they did not expect, but they don't know how to spin the news of it. That is our take on it. Of course, we could be wrong.

Also interesting that some people, in the intelligence world, don't trust Israel. And maybe they would like to see Israel's plans for world domination thwarted?
CIA calls Israel main US regional spy threat, 7/30/12


UPDATED 8/1/12

Aangirfan has several posts on this situation, Mossad and Bandar being the latest. The debkafile article posits: (http://www.debka.com/article/22225/Saudi-silence-on-intelligence-chief-Bandar%E2%80%99s-fate-denotes-panic)

1) Saudis are panicked that they have been infiltrated, and that's why they haven't made an announcement yet. They are trying to find the hole and the mole. (We agree.)
2) Unnamed sources to Df doubt that Syrian intelligence has the capability to infiltrate Saudi Arabia and conduct this hit. (We don't know about that. We suppose at the very least Syrian intelligence has allies such as Russia that would have the capability. Also Iran. Bandar was instrumental in the first Afghan war back in the 80s that Russia got sucked into for many years. He would certainly have made many enemies over the years, from many places.)
3) Df concludes it must be Iran. (Imagine our shock.)
4) Df says the hit happened Monday, 7/23. (We read about it Sunday, 7/22, see above.)
5) Df claims to be the "first world publication" to report the attack. (O RLY?)
6) Df posits that Iran hired al qaeda, as it has done before. (AQ, created and run by the CIA and Mossad? So Iran and CIA are on the same team? And CIA and Mossad are on the same team, except for the part where the CIA doesn't trust Israel because of all the spying -- see link above...? So actually, it's impossible to know. There could be double and triple crosses going on here, especially since you never know who might be a crypto-Jew.)

Mostaque Ali: More Crypto-Jews in the Muslim World? 4/23/08

Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Iran...?

Also see some old posts here:
one big happy family i guess
let's pretend
plan c: back door through Saudi Arabia?
have another cup of joe with me

All we know is that Saudi Arabia is saying nothing, and the controlled media (and you know who controls it) is saying nothing. Why is that? Because.... they respect Saudi Arabia and the news is unconfirmed? Well, tell us since when have journalists been so careful? Since when has respect and confirmation been important? All who pay attention know that they repeat lie after lie, they photo shop, they use old photos and say they are new, they build sets and broadcast fake battles, they do ALL MANNER of deception; but they are not talking about this. Interesting.


UPDATE 8/1/12: Anonymous in Aan's comment section has another theory, very well-reasoned:

Anonymous Anonymous said...
Yes, it would appear Saudi Arabia intelligence has been infiltrated...

Or, as a result of Bandar attempting a coup to put his dying father on the throne, likely, so Bandar, himself, could assume the throne upon his father's death (which he did shortly die), others in the Saudi ruling clique took great offense.

Bandar dropped from public sight and was either banished from Saudi Arabia or was internally confined.

Imagine how others in the Saudi leadership viewed the attempted coup and then their horror when Bandar was not just brought back to public prominence, but made intelligence chief?

Bandar was aggressive in being "Washington's boy" and inserting itself in "revolution", at Washington's urging. Not all of Saudi Arabia's ruling clique is one board for this position (encouraging popular protest must make a number of Saudi's ruling clique nervous considering their own citizens' protests and risk for overthrowing the monarchy).

Look to score settling and removing a potential rival who had already attempted a coup and taken Saudi Arabia from being somewhat independent (or at least allowed factions in the ruling clique to think they had freedom of action) to a complete vassal of the United States.

What better cover to assassinate Bandar and have it blamed on Syria or Iran.

Some claim with some evidence that the Saudi monarchy is cryto-jewish, that would explain cooperation with the Israeli government, but might other Saudis within the ruling clique be nervous having Israeli government assets working on Saudi soil?

Apparently, Bandar had a working relationship with Israel's government and intelligence services, again, might that upset certain factions in Saudi Arabia's ruling clique?

Might some in the Saudi ruling clique think Bandar had made Saudi Arabia a "lap dog" for Israel's foreign policy to destabilize the Middle East and deeply resented that "lap dog" status?

Silence from the Saudi government can mean many things, but it could mean that there is fear of dramatic internal divisions within the Saudi ruling clique coming out into the Saudi public's consciousness, which could open a pandora's box threatening the whole regime.

In conclusion: Who had the best access to Bandar and would know his schedule?

Answer: Others within the Saudi ruling clique.
Additional reading, links found via There Are No Sunglasses:

Syrian Intelligence War: A Tale of Two Security Headquarters
"There is much more to the conflict in Syria than meets the eye. Syria is currently the scene of a cold war between the US, NATO, Israel, and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) on one side and Russia, China, Iran, and the Resistance Bloc on the other hand. Amidst the fighting between the Syrian government and anti-government forces, an intense intelligence war has also been taking place."

HERE is the Yinon Plan. Note that it has been around for about 30 years.


This is an important document. You should read it.

The plan operates on two essential premises. To survive, Israel must 1) become an imperial regional power, and 2) must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states. Small here will depend on the ethnic or sectarian composition of each state. Consequently, the Zionist hope is that sectarian-based states become Israel's satellites and, ironically, its source of moral legitimation....What they want and what they are planning for is not an Arab world, but a world of Arab fragments that is ready to succumb to Israeli hegemony.
You can also read more about the Yinon Plan and fission field warfare in this post written by James at Winter Patriot Community.

As described in the Yinon Plan, the goal is to balkanize Syria and the Middle East, including Turkey, which is stupidly laying its neck on the block to be balkanized, too.  Putting as many countries into perpetual war -- internal war, external war, any kind will do -- as possible, FREEING UP Israel to do whatever the hell it wants.

Peter Chamberlin: [Hatay is the coastal region where the body of Russian General Yuri Yevgenyevich Ivanov was recovered, after drowning in Syria, on August 6, 2010, approximately 40 miles south of there (SEE:  The Obscenity of Humanitarian Warfare).  This area today is "ground zero" in the invasion of Syria by the mercenaries of Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United States.  General Ivanov was murdered to prevent him reporting on what he saw there.   The build-up to invasion was taking place there, even in 2010, so was the great spy war.]

Coincidentally, on 7/19/12, Omar Suleiman, former spy chief of Egypt under Mubarak, reportedly in good health, died suddenly at a US hospital while undergoing tests. "His loyalty in guarding the secrets of the previous authoritarian regime has earned him the title of the “black box.”" ~ source


the fuse that connects the hemispheres

A quick update on the Hezbollah narrative.

ACCORDING TO THE NARRATIVE, Hezbollah has been set up as the fuse that will connect the hemispheres. A terrorist attack in the Western hemisphere will be traced back to the places that need to be attacked in the East, like Syria and Lebanon and Iran. The narrative groundwork has been laid for this for a very long time, and that's what the experts will come forth to say at the appropriate time because that's what they've been saying for years. So they will appear to have credibility.

But of course, it is a narrative. A story. They need the story because most Americans don't give a shit about other people in other countries, so in order to make them care enough to GO TO WAR AGAIN, something has to connect back and HURT Americans. That's what always "changes everything," as we've seen before. People can die all day long, be murdered day after day, but until a bunch of Americans die at the hands of some terrorists, it doesn't really matter.

Remember people, there is NO EVIDENCE linking Iran and Hezbollah to the Argentine bombings of the early 1990s. IN FACT, the EVIDENCE shows with 99% certainty that the bombs were INSIDE THE JEWISH CONTROLLED BUILDINGS. Please click through the links as we have written about this many, many times, because certain people keep bringing it up.

The Argentine bombings form the base of the pyramid of lies that is the Hezbollah in South America Terrorist Threat Narrative. This narrative is very important to the authorities because it will allow the linkages to be connected very quickly, like a lit fuse, from Syria and Lebanon, to Iran, to Africa, to South America, and up to the USA; through the various "black holes" of organized crime, and by that route will the USA be drawn into a fast response should something happen. Meaning, drawn into WW III. There will be no time to waste, you can count on that, because whenever the terrorists on the payroll strike, the experts always have it all figured out in minutes. Which never seems to strike anyone on teevee as odd.

Let's go directly to History Commons then, one more time.

March 17, 1992: Israeli Embassy in Buenos Aires is bombed, Hezbollah and Iran accused despite lack of evidence

Twenty-nine people are killed in the bombing of the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires, Argentina. The bombing levels the three-story building. Argentina, the US, and Israel will later accuse Hezbollah and its backer Iran, but provide little evidence. According to most media accounts and the US State Department’s annual report on terrorism, the bombing was the work of a Hezbollah suicide bomber who drove a truck into the building. [Los Angeles Times, 5/8/1992; Patterns of Global Terrorism, 4/30/1993; Fox News, 10/5/2007] However, a technical report ordered by Argentina’s Supreme Court will find that the bomb was placed inside the building: “Court official Guillermo Lopez said that the investigation had ascertained that the explosives had been located on the first floor of the diplomatic headquarters. ‘The engineers established, with 99 percent certainty, the exact location where the explosives were and the quantity that was used.’” That conclusion is angrily rejected by Israel. [NotiSur, 8/16/1996] The case remains unsolved. [Ha'aretz, 3/17/2008]

Latest developments include:

1) Bibi claims to have "rock solid" evidence about the Bulgarian attack on Israeli tourists. Friendly intelligence agencies around the world agree, it has to be Hezbollah.

“I am giving you something that I know as the Prime Minister of Israel, because I know on absolutely rock-solid intelligence this is Hezbollah and this is something Iran knows about very, very well.”



All you need to know is they were "exceptionally experienced," they worked carefully to avoid detection, they were in Bulgaria for over a month, they were never seen together, etc., according to the Bulgarian officials, who have DECLINED to offer an opinion on who these murderous conspirators might be, while standing next to Obama's top counterterrorism advisor John Brennan, but Israel of course has no such scruples and can tell you the answer straight out, even though they cannot show you any evidence, because that is all above your paygrade and you are NOTHING, a SLAVE, a ZERO, a USELESS HUMAN WHO IS TAKING UP TOO MUCH SPACE.

"Mr. Borisov, who made his statements at a briefing in the capital, Sofia, alongside John O. Brennan, President Obama’s top counterterrorism adviser, did not offer any opinion about who was behind the attack.
Israeli officials said that the bombing was the work of Hezbollah operatives backed by Iran. Privately, two American officials said on Tuesday that the Shiite movement Hezbollah was responsible for the bombing based on classified “sources and methods” — typically a reference to electronic intercepts and information from spies on the ground. But the officials declined to offer specific details. For now, American officials are limiting their public comments to the formulation that the bombing bears “all the hallmarks” of other Hezbollah plots, including the arrest in Cyprus earlier this month of a suspected operative of Hezbollah on the suspicion of scheming to kill Israeli tourists there.
“It’s early in the investigation,” said Matthew Levitt, a former Treasury Department counterterrorism official who is writing a book about Hezbollah’s global operations. “They’ve got sketches out. They’re working the DNA. American authorities are waiting to allow the investigation to run its course.”"

See? It bears all the hallmarks of a Mossad false flag blamed on Hezbollah but no one will go on the record here, that could be dangerous to their credibility.


3) Meantime, more breathless panting in the background about Obama not recognizing the Threat Closer to Home, that would be Hugo Chavez, and the Russians and Chinese and the Iranians and Hezbollah of course, in South America, having moved up from the Tri-Border Area to Isla de Margarita. You will see the same names over and over and over again:

"Obama's blink portends disaster for US" 

"Mr. Chavez’s hospitality also extends to Iranian proxy Hezbollah, which has been allowed to establish training camps and fundraising centers on Margarita Island, eclipsing the continent’s Tri-Border Area — where Brazil, Argentina, and Paraguay meet — as the primary locus of Hezbollah activity in South America."

OOPS he forgot to cite the evidence for that claim, see here.

And the Examiner, we always get a kick out of the Examiner...


...citing The Heritage Foundation's Peter Brooks, Robert F. Noreiga, and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen.

Ileana Ros-Lehtinen getting TOP MARKS for whoring this narrative with impressive sycophantic endurance. We wonder what she gets for that.

We don't do politics but we have long considered the fix in for Romney. The way this narrative progresses indicates that Obama does not take the Threat Closer To Home seriously. He's one little terrorist attack in the Western Hemisphere away from done.


bell book & candle

UPDATE: Also see A13's post Predictive Programming + London Olympics = The Satanic NWO Inception -- excellent unpacking as usual by A13 and also a lot of keen observations and good links in the comment thread.


We've been looking over the London Olympics false flag chatter, and we find it all compelling. There's no question that the elites would like to close the deal on their new order in the very near future, and that requires a major chaos-inducing event. The reports of security lapses, possible bombs in the subway system, creepy predictive programming, and abundant symbolism in the structures and logo, all do point to a bad conclusion. 


And yet, what if nothing happens? What if the olympics come and go and.... there's no false flag?

Remember that the Tavistockean social engineers love that stress & relief business. As we contemplate the very thorough circumstantial evidence that something horrible might go down during the olympics, let's also think a few steps past the olympics.

If nothing horrible happens, such as a spectacular terrorist attack triggering WWIII, the people noting all the circumstantial evidence will be discredited as paranoid fear-mongers. Needless to say, this would be very helpful to the social engineers. Everyone would breathe a huge sigh of relief?

And then, just when you least expect it, when you think you dodged the bullet... the catastrophe happens.

"The British firm chosen to create a 23-ton bell to ring in the Olympics has admitted it will be made in Holland. The Whitechapel Bell Foundry, which dates back to at least 1570 and cast Big Ben, was considered an obvious choice by the Olympic organiser Locog to make the bell that will mark the start of the London 2012 Games. But now the firm has revealed that while the bell – Europe’s biggest – has been designed in-house, it will be manufactured by a Dutch company." source

See Kev Boyle: 13th August London Olympics

Of the various theories expounded on in the top link, we found one that flicked our whiskers: the bell, book & candle ritual.

Bell, Book, and Candle is an old ritual of the most serious form of excommunication, the anathema, dating back to the 9th century or thereabouts.

The bell is tolled to announce the spiritual death of the excommunicant. The book from which the bishop reads the ritual (representing the authority of the Church) is closed -- as in the matter is closed, judgment as been rendered. The candles are extinguished (perhaps even thrown on the floor). Lit candles represent the light of Christ. As long as the candles are lit it is thought the offender may repent. When the offender does not repent and they are extinguished it represents the quenching of grace in the offender's soul.

From the Encyclopedia Britannica is this description:

"The ceremony was performed in some conspicuous place, and, upon its termination, letters were written to bishops of other sees to report the fact. When the assemblage had been convoked, a bishop appeared with 12 priests, and all 13 held lighted candles. The bishop, wearing violet vestments, then recited the formula, ending thus: “We separate him, together with his accomplices and abettors, from the precious body and blood of the Lord and from the society of all Christians; we exclude him from our holy mother the church in heaven and on earth; we declare him excommunicate and anathema; we judge him damned, with the devil and his angels and all the reprobate, to eternal fire until he shall recover himself from the toils of the devil and return to amendment and to penitence.” Those present answered, “So be it!” Then the bishop and the 12 priests extinguished their candles by dashing them to the ground, and (as a general rule) the ceremony then ended."

The cauldron is lit at Temple Newsam
"Torchbearer Aaron Bell lights the cauldron with the Olympic Flame at the historic estate of Temple Newsam in Leeds at the end of Day 37 of the London 2012 Olympic Torch Relay."source

How quaint and medieval and positively creepy! Cursing people by bell book & candle.
THE origin of the custom of “cursing by bell, book, and candle,” is altogether obscure. There seems to be no ground for believing that it was officially recognised by the Roman Church, and Roman Catholics have gone so far as to say that the tradition is a Protestant fabrication. Others, while admitting its authenticity, say that the practice belongs only to local rituals, and that it was forbidden by the pope whenever a case was brought before him. However this may be, we have sufficient testimony from mediæval writers to show that it was no mere old wives’ tale, but a very real terror to transgressors; and in a few cases we have accounts still extant of the time, place, and manner of the ceremony.

The late Mr. T. P. Earwaker, F.S.A. (one of the most accomplished and trustworthy archæologists of the time), published in the Manchester Courier (1878) “A curious Lancashire Record” of this 112rite. Mr. J. Paul Rylands, F.S.A., followed this up by a paper in which he cited many learned authorities bearing on the question; and to his article I am largely indebted for the information I have been able to gather.
Two passages from the “Ingoldsby Legends” will occur to every reader. (1) the occasion on which Pope Gregory was only restrained from calling down a curse on the head of Sir Ingoldsby Bray by the timely atonement of the sinner in the form of substantial gifts to the Church; (2) the Cardinal’s curse, all too thoroughly carried out, on the Jackdaw of Rheims. These can scarcely be looked upon as documentary evidence; but there is thus much of historical interest attaching to the latter legend, that the first known instance in which such sentence was pronounced occurred at Rheims about the year 900.* The culprits were murderers; but it is possible that the incident may have suggested to Barham the locale for his story.
In Shakespeare’s King John (Act 3 Scene iii), Faulconbridge is commanded to hasten to England to collect money for the wars, and responds: —
“Bell, book, and candle shall not drive me back,
When gold and silver becks me to come on.”...Staveley says the curse “was solemnly thundered out once in every quarter; the Fyrst Sonday of Advent at comyng of our Lord Jhesus Cryst; the fyrst Sonday of Lenteen; the Sonday in the Feste of the Trynyte; and Sonday within the Utas (octave) of the blessed Vyrgin our Lady S. Mary.”

Well, as it turns out, the fourth quarter occasion for this ritual, the Sunday within the octave of the blessed virgin, seems to be Sunday August 12th, the day of the closing ceremony. The church's liturgical year ends on All Saint's Day, November 1st.


ASSUMPTION OF MARY INTO HEAVEN - Feast - August 15This uniterrupted tradition of the Church dates back to 549 A.D. as witnessed by Gregory of Tours and other Fathers of the Church. According to private revelations by St. Bridget and recent archeological findings, Ephesus is the most likely place where Mary died. In 1946 Pope Pius XII received an affirmative response from all the bishops and promulgated the dogma of Mary's assumption on November 1, 1950.
QUEENSHIP OF THE VIRGIN MARY - Feast - August 22This feast was instituted on May 31, 1955 by Pope Pius XII when he issued the encyclical "Ad coeli Reginam". This feast had actually been proposed five times prior to Pius XII action. It was moved to the Octave of Mary's Assumption into Heaven to link it with her glorification as stated in Lumen GentiumThe Immaculate Virgin was taken up body and soul into heavenly glory when her earthly life was over, and exalted by the Lord as Queen over all things, that she might be the more fully conformed to her Son, the Lord of lords Rv 19:16 and conqueror of sin and death.
So, perhaps a bit of a stretch, but then again, isn't it all?

"The Closing Ceremony celebrates the achievements of athletes at the London 2012 Olympic Games, and includes a Handover from one Host City to the next. In 2012, London will hand over to Rio de Janeiro for the 2016 Olympic Games. The Closing Ceremony also features the extinguishing of the Olympic Flame, signalling the end of the Games."


The whole thing is a ritual from start to finish. The closing ceremony may be a ritual to extinguish the light of Christ in all who participate? To excommunicate the living? How many people will be watching the spectacle worldwide, and riding along the emotional wave? Even if we get to the other side of it unscathed, don't think that we dodged anything. There may be other forms of false flag to disseminate throughout the world at the conclusion of the ritual.

PS. We think it would be a good idea not to watch the closing ceremony. Passive non compliance means don't participate. Don't watch and don't listen.

legal mumbo jumbo

Disclaimer: The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.

Fair Use: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.