"Albert Pike is to Freemasonry what Shakespeare is
to Drama."
~ From the way-back machine.
Further from the same link:
First they eliminate all "documents" - not that a oral secret society such as Freemasonry or the KKK keeps a paper trail. Then they say no documents exist or none can be found. [See: exposure, no evidence, plenty of evidence] If there is any eyewitness testimony included in books or writings on the topic they deny the books or writings exist, if that fails they attack the witnesses and try and destroy their character - even if they were masons and thereby ignoring their oaths on the matter, and if that fails they attack the character of the authors themselves - again if they also too were masons. Finally they will simply lie or mischaracterize the nature of a book or writing by terming it 'anti' - even if the work was 'pro' but written in another time before the fall of the KKK. The use of the term "anti" is one of pure Orwellian rhetoric. All those who write critically of Freemasonry are anti's and all anti's are frauds, liars, zealots, or extremists and cannot be accepted. Therefore there is no such thing as a legitimate work criticizing Freemasonry because by it's very nature it must be 'anti' and organized Freemasonry will accept no references from 'anti's' in any debate or discussion of Freemasonry.Something we have noted before...
It is very important in particular to note the importance of EVIDENCE, or LACK OF EVIDENCE. We have noted this many times, how people demand PROOF of various allegations....How easy is it to make the evidence go away? It's very easy when organized crime has at it's service the military, the media, and people highly placed in governments and bodies throughout the world. ~ exposure
Freemasory is Judaism for gentiles.
Masonic monument in Israel
Albert Pike was the head of the supreme council of freemasonry starting in 1859, for 32 years. He wrote a letter dated 8/15/1871 laying out the three world wars required to bring about the One World Order. If you have never read about this letter, we will leave it to you to click through and read about it. His predictions for WWI and WWII are accurate, or perhaps we can more accurately say that events transpired according to his direction.
His instructions for WWIII:
"The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time."Pike... putting world events in context since 1871...? [UPDATE: Maybe not. See Aangirfan's latest post and also here, debunking the Pike letter as cited.]
Step one: Destroy Israel and Islam. Well we see Islamic countries getting destroyed one by one, but so far Israel has escaped destruction. War with neighbors Syria and Lebanon will not leave Israel untouched. That much has been promised. Picking a war with Iran, that Israel cannot execute alone, will not leave Israel untouched.
Inexplicably, Netanyahu never stops trying to pick wars that will get Israel destroyed unless Team NATO steps in.
And yet we hear from multiple corporate media sources that the big players of Team NATO have supposedly warned Israel to stand down or go it alone. So they have been told. If Israel starts something, ALLEGEDLY, if we are to believe these reports, their "friends" in Team NATO will not pull their obnoxious asses out of the fire. And Israel would be destroyed...? Seems hard to believe, but then again, looking at the Pike instructions, which have already been followed for two world wars...we can't be too sure.
General Dempsey with Obama
Meantime, Iran's nuclear weapons are a false pretext, as anyone paying attention has known for years. This is really about MONEY. The money woes drive the timetable. The people in power need to retain control over the world populations via currencies. That requires control over oil. Oil = petrodollars = control. The alleged nuclear targets in Iran are probably oilfields and production facilities.
Iran was among the few nations to have escaped this global privatization scheme. Iran had its own oil. It managed to avoid the trap of letting its currency be devalued by speculators by imposing foreign exchange restrictions and price controls on its national currency (the rial), something it could afford to do because it had adequate foreign exchange reserves from its oil sales....Islamic scholars have been seeking to devise a global banking system that would serve as an alternative to the usury-based scheme now in control internationally, and Iran has led the way in devising that model. Iran is characterized as a democratic Islamic republic, which enforces Islamic principles not only morally but legally and politically. ~ Ellen Brown, Behind the Drums of War with Iran: Nuclear Weapons or Compound Interest, 11/13/2007
Iranian oil fields
http://sitemaker.umich.edu/ipe2010/maps
So, war conditioning continues apace. We see the ridiculous over-reaction to the alleged killing of a diplomat in Libya: US warships entering the area. It's one thing for Team NATO + Israel to literally destroy Libya and murder tens of thousands of innocent people, and kill their leader, and install terrorists for a government -- all of that is Perfectly OK. But when an American diplomat dies, it's an act of war and an outrageous Breach of our SOVEREIGNTY. [UPDATE: A Jim Stone report into the matter reveals that there IS NO official US Embassy in Benghazi. Was the whole thing made up out of whole cloth as a pretext to move warships off the coast and get special teams on the ground? Are the photos from one of the sets used to create news? We cannot find a single image of this supposed Benghazi embassy from before the attack. Well anyway, don't expect the warships to be called back.]
[UPDATE: Obama skipped all his PDB (daily intelligence briefings) in the week leading up to the attack. Goes with the unheeded warnings 48 hours before. Hmm. Shades of GWB before 9/11... who could have imagined blah blah blah...]
kiss kiss hug hug
“Instead, when our grounds are being attacked and being breached, the
first response of the United States must be outrage at the breach of the
sovereignty of our nation.” ~ Romney
See: Aangirfan and one of the source documents here:
Reportedly, the Neocon faction (Romney, Netanyahu) gains from the attack on the US consulate in Libya.In our opinion, "National Security" has traditionally been an issue of advantage for the Republicans. When we see "National Security" threatened, we expect the Republican to gain traction. We agree with the analysis that the events strengthen Romney, despite his idiotic remarks. Since when has being an idiot precluded election to president? [UPDATE: Romney's key foreign policy advisors: Rich Williamson, former aide to John McCain; Missouri Senator Jim Talent; John McCain; Dan Senor; Condoleeza Rice; Jim Baker; Mitchell Reiss (source)]
Reportedly, the Trilateral faction (Rockefeller, Brzezinski, Obama) loses.
"From the very execution of this false flag in this particular manner we can lean that the Neocon faction seems to be gaining the upper hand from the trilaterals in the power struggle over who controls the rogue network - deep state apparatus...
*#%**#@!
This leads into a hypothetical scenario, Step One, whereby something very bad happens in the Middle East, involving Israel, Syria and probably Lebanon, and then events are fortuitously prevented from becoming all out war, thanks to the great restraint of generals in the US, Russia and China. They have hinted as much. This leads into Step Two.
Step Two: Provoking a Formidable Social Cataclysm. Most of the world finds themselves very grateful not to be vaporized. Grateful to the military, not to politicians. Nonetheless, the brinksmanship and terror of this conflict spreading into global war easily causes enough chaos to quickly take down the petrodollar. Since the fed needs to be replaced by another power of different name but same function, we see this as the actual goal of the entire geopolitical operation. The economic distress paves the way for the new world currency, presumably to be backed by gold. Who has a lot of gold? Reportedly, China. With the worst crisis -- global nuclear war -- averted, there is plenty left to fight about: Israel's destruction. The Arab World's destruction. The United State's destruction. The economy's destruction. What kind of New World should we have, with what kind of currency, ETC. Stress & relief, stress & relief, stress & relief. In other words, expect "a formidable social cataclysm."
And, we should add, timing is everything. Does a war go down before the election or after? Who makes that decision? People in the deep state. Who controls the apparatus of the deep state? That is the question.
After some time of horror, with many people dying, the banksters hope we end up with a new world currency. The banksters want to restart their clock with the new gold-backed currency -- the names and players all having changed but nothing having actually changed in terms of control.
(Also see: pony business)
Catch 22, also known here as WIN WIN.
How do the people of the world avoid this type of outcome?
final pic: note the guy with the RED BEARD in Bangladesh
A calling card?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2203019/Middle-East-protests-FBI-warns-attacks-spread-U-S.html