i put my stock in vladimir

Space appears to have opened up between Medvedev and Putin. Medvedev has apparently come into alignment with "The West," The West being a euphemism for "countries under Israel's control."

The careful smear campaign against Putin indicates that he has a different agenda from "The West" and also that he is feared and dangerous.

The visit by Netanyahu to Russia, combined with the Arctic Sea, confirm that Russia has tremendous power to deter Israel from striking Iran. But who really controls Russia, Putin or Medvedev? Presumably Putin. Is the split between Putin and Medvedev real? Is Medvedev zooming The West or Putin?

Who would *you* zoom if you were him?

I don't think this is over yet.


hakim said...

Putin = Stud

Medvedev = Dud

A. Peasant said...

this is true. putin also has history that makes him a formidable opponent, and having a sidekick allows him a lot more room to maneuver. he's certainly several steps ahead of the dynamics being played out now in the media.

INCOMING!!!!!!! said...

Putin is the main man if you check over at my place I gave the then G8 leaders a quick run down in July.


It's the Putin/Merkel show, they're both deep deep commie operators. Any Medvedyev angst we see is psyops.

A. Peasant said...

hot damn, good rundown. don't know what you make of c. story but he has merkel as bush senior's flunkey whose main job is hiding the stolen money. and he says the whole thing is ultimately run out of germany.

curious what you think about this stuff with putin?


wouldn't this put him on a different "team?"

i dunno. it's all pretty fucked up but i find it hard to believe that everyone will continue to roll over the same way.

Greg Bacon said...

This is a bit off topic, but too good to pass up.

Israel, he added, was one of the first countries to support the formation of permanent court of law for crimes against humanity - a proposal that came up following the successful performance of the special tribunals on Bosnia.

However, that changed, he said, after Egypt insisted at the Rome conference that the mandate of this permanent court include occupied territories. This prompted Israel to join the six other countries that voted against the formation of the International Court of Justice, including the United States, China and Libya.


"Sure, we're for the ICC in COUNTRIES, and we'll... What the Fuck, who in the hell inserted that language about occupied territories? What the hell you trying to do, get us tossed in jail or something?"

A. Peasant said...

yes, there's always a special category for israel. no declared borders, no declared nuclear weapons. And they don't cooperate with anything they don't like, like this thing here:


"Israel will not cooperate in any matter with this resolution which is only aiming at reinforcing political hostilities and lines of division in the Middle East region."

because everyone is always trying to pick on them greg. like you and me for instance.

INCOMING!!!!!!! said...


came across the Tomlinson stuff a while back in a different form.

Just filed it away for further verification if possible.

A good rule of thumb when dealing with these public school boy Brit Operators is to always assume it's bullshit. They've been at it for centuries.

Glad to see you cast your net far and wide though.

As for the German angle that makes sense, since they've been deep into USofA since the Nazi loot needed laundering.

BTW I came across a ref which I'm trying to track down again about Soetoro being fingered as their man by Ex Soviets at a dinner party in Moscow 1992-3!!!! I found it whilst searching for other info and made the stupid mistake of not bkmking it immediately.

C ya.

A. Peasant said...

that actually rings a bell here too but i prolly don't have it either, though i've bookmarked lots of strange things in my journeys. but then periodically i have to clear the clutter. you take care.

Greg Bacon said...

I came across a ref which I'm trying to track down again about Soetoro being fingered as their man by Ex Soviets at a dinner party in Moscow 1992-3

Maybe, but why am I getting this deja vu feeling again?

Clinton tried to make some progress on ME peace and I guess he wasn't following the Israeli playbook 100%, since the Zioinst media tore him a new one for getting a BJ from a Jewish 'honeypot.'

Whatever chances there might of been for some sanity inserted into the ME was lost to lurid tales of stain bespotted blue dresses.

And I'm guessing that's what's taking place again. Obama isn't following Israel's orders completely and looking the other way and for that 'uppity' stance, he's being savaged in America 24/7, which is turning into a spectacle that will make his presidency neutered and unable to bring some change to the Israeli occupation of Palestine.

Or maybe I'm being paranoid, but I don't think so.

So America, keep bitching about 'Barry" and commie health care and socialism and let the Fed keep robbing us blind and Israel leading us into more ME grief.

A. Peasant said...

greg i think your instinct is correct. there must be factions battling. the trap for iran seems pretty obvious, maybe too obvious. iran may be the bait in an even larger trap. ??

INCOMING!!!!!!! said...

AP, the universe was working with me this time and found it no trouble.

Didn't really think about it too much when I first read it, as I said, and went about tracking down what I wanted at the time.


A. Peasant said...

aha! the second i saw it i remembered where i saw it first: rumor mill news.


"interesting" site, that one. o_O

INCOMING!!!!!!! said...

Yep, just like Sorcha Faal you need to know before you go there what's what? Otherwise your head explodes!!!

Have you checked out a great site called Aangirfan?

A. Peasant said...

ha, no kidding! yes i do go visit aangirfan from time to time.

legal mumbo jumbo

Disclaimer: The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.

Fair Use: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.