who wants a pulitzer prize?

So have no fear of them, for nothing is covered that will not be revealed, or hidden that will not be known. - Jesus Christ

 source

In 1999 an obscure book published in Italy caused a stir and had to be discredited as nothing more than rumors and innuendo and sour grapes.

Steamy Vatican book creates stir

By Orla Guerin in Rome

A controversial novel of illicit sex and corruption in the Vatican is raising temperatures inside and outside the Catholic church.

And as if the setting of Gone with the Wind in the Vatican was not bad enough, it is now suspected that the author - I Millenari - is in fact a group of priests.

Only one of them has publicly admitted his involvement: Monsignor Luigi Marinelli, a 72-year-old retired priest.

Now, the Vatican has begun disciplinary proceedings against him, and he is expected to be stripped of his authority to say Mass at a disciplinary hearing in the autumn.

But he claims he is being victimised for telling the truth.

"A healthy and holy church is not afraid of the truth, even if that truth is uncomfortable," he said. "Those who have taken this action may want to teach a lesson to those of us who have been brave enough to write in this way."

The book is full of colourful but unsubstantiated tales of sex, cronyism and corruption - like the one about the bishop being blackmailed by his illegitimate daughter.

Vatican sources claim Monsignor Marinelli is angry and bitter because during his 45 years in the church, he failed to secure high office.

It is a claim he strenuously denies.

The Vatican failed in its attempt to get him to withdraw the book from sale.

Indeed, the move backfired badly, with the publicity resulting in sales of 100,000 copies in the last three weeks alone.

Book-sellers say the novel, published by Kaos Edizione of Milan - is now out of print.

Foreign language editions are expected to be published in the autumn.

"It's certainly scandal-mongering," said Monsignor David Lewis, "and I think most laymen throughout the world have such good common sense that they would see immediately that this is a project of a ... not necessarily a sick mind, but a person who is so overcome with rancour and anger that he sometimes ... his mind is obscured."

But Marco Tusati, a long-time Vatican watcher for the Italian newspaper La Stampa, believes the book shouldn't be taken too seriously.

"There are scandals and maybe they are like everywhere else," he said. "But I don't think they are so mysterious and colourful and picturesque as the people think they are."

Oh dear.

^^^^^^^

A book reviewer, before dismissing it as being unsubstantiated, tells us the following details:

In the 300 pages of his work, the author accuses the Vatican, among other things, of favoring a “consumerist Church”, (p. 16), of suppressing freedom of expression (p. 20), and of being a grand gossip center (“un villaggio de lavandaie”).

He says that Vatican diplomacy began with the betrayal of St. Peter (p. 22) and that a system of absolute and unlimited power reigns internally in the Holy See (p. 32), a system contrary to the fundamental rights of the human person (p. 35). He accuses the Vatican of unjustly brandishing the anathema of heresy against those who denounce this “cancerous infection” inside the Holy See and follow “the passion of the mystical Christ” (p. 40).

He also accuses the Vatican of habitually shielding the crimes committed by career-climbers in “court conspiracies” (p.43), and of covering up the theft of files that recount the dissatisfaction of subordinates with their superiors (p. 57-9).

The book further accuses John Paul II of being a plaything in the hands of the Curia, which sends him off traveling so that it can direct the internal politics as it so desires (p.63). The majority of those chosen to become Bishops, it goes on to say, are chosen by the exchange of favors, and not by merit (p. 79), and the author says that even the lower dignities are bought and sold in the “marketplace of monsignors” (pp.85-6). He compares maneuvers of ecclesiastical politics to Mafia tactics (Cosa nostra)(p.103), with subordinates forced to obey silently and mindlessly (p. 106). He states that it is very common for those who do not walk the line to be cast “into the dust and the mud of calumny”(p. 109). He compares the control that the Prefecture of the Pontifical House exercises over the Pope to a Masonic stratagem (pp. 109-10), and affirms that the Curia is controlled mainly by two currents, the Piacentini (those who come from Piacenza) and the Romagnoli (those who come from Romagna) (pp.113-122). “Morality in the Vatican is infested with intrigue, corruption, favoritism and endorsements,” says the author (p. 126). Backstabbing and denunciations are also the common orders of the day (p. 130).

Homosexuality is viewed with complaisance in the Vatican, he accuses, and then names Paul VI as one implicated (pp. 135-44). He tries to describe with details the career struggle of the ambitious and points to those linked to Masonry as those who are most successful (p. 161). To climb the career ladder, some who knew “the weaknesses” of Paul VI threatened to expose these things to the press (p. 169).21 He affirms that, with the knowledge of Msgr. Giovan Battista Montini (the future Paul VI) when he was the pro-Secretary of State of Pius XII, a Jesuit priest delivered to the Soviets a list of Bishops and priests who were there in clandestine, and that these were imprisoned and killed (p. 170).

He also declares that Masonry has infiltrated the whole Vatican (pp. 223-242), emphasizing that Paul VI was particularly pleased to choose Michele Sindona and Roberto Calvi, known Masons, to important administrative roles in Church finances (p. 226). He emphasizes the “condemnation to a forced retirement” that is the sentence for ecclesiastics who disagree with the reigning politics (pp. 250-1).

It may be unsubstantiated, but it certainly has the ring of truth.

^^^^^^^


About a year later, exactly a year to the day before 911 in fact, a disturbing incident happened at Pope John Paul's daily mass. A young woman behaved as if possessed by the devil. The pope failed to cast out her demons.


September 11, 2000: Devil defeats the Pope in Vatican exorcism

THE Pope carried out an impromptu exorcism on a teenage girl after she began "screaming insults in a cavernous voice" during an audience in the Vatican City, it emerged at the weekend.
Despite the Pope's efforts and those of his chief "Satan-buster", Fr Gabriele Amorth, the girl remained "possessed". The Devil's voice "sneeringly laughed from within her" at the Pope's failed attempt to drive him away....The paper said that although there may have been other instances of people being possessed in the Vatican, last week's incident had been "spectacular" and Satan had "shown his muscles"....Constrained by Vatican guards, she was said to have displayed "a super-human strength" as she violently pushed them away. Bishop Gianni Danzi, Secretary-General of Vatican City, intervened and sought to calm her by showed her a crucifix. But she began "insulting him, uttering disconnected phrases, and speaking in unknown tongues".

^^^^^^^


Many have written about the scandalous popes of history. The Vatican's chief exorcist, Father Gabriel Amorth, 84, also recently spoke about 'evidence the devil is in the Vatican.'


What you didn't know about the Popes of Rome

"Most frighteningly for John Paul, he had come up against the irremovable presence of a malign strength in his own Vatican and in certain bishop's chanceries. It was what knowledgeable Churchmen called the 'superforce.' Rumors, difficult to verify, tied its installation to the beginning of Paul VI's reign in 1963. Indeed, Paul had alluded somberly to 'the smoke of Satan which has entered the Sanctuary,' an oblique reference to an enthronement ceremony performed by Satanists in the Vatican. Besides, the incidence of Satanic pedophilia 'rites and practices' was already documented among certain bishops and priests as widely dispersed as Turin in Italy and South Carolina in the United States. The cultic acts of Satanic pedophilia are considered by professionals to be the culmination of the Fallen Archangel's rites."

Adding fuel to the fire is ex-Jesuit Robert Kaiser with his recent book Clerical Error. Kaiser states that Malachi Martin was something of a confabulist who lived for 30 years as a kept man under the roof of Manhattan socialite Kakia Livanos, the ex-wife of Greek shipping magnate Stavros Niarchos. Kaiser goes on to say that Martin also stole his wife Mary from him at one point in the 60s when all three were quartered in Rome. Kaiser also surmises that Martin may have been a paid lobbyist for the American Jewish Committee.

^^^^^^^

Henry Makow, referencing that last link, recently wrote about Malachi Martin, "former" Jesuit (Sabbatean), as well. Sabbateans long ago infiltrated the Catholic Church, exacerbating the Church's other spectacular corruption problems.


Bursting the Malachi Martin Bubble

Martin's books exposed satanic practices in the Catholic church, and the Pope's role in the New World Order. While pretending to be against world government and the decline of traditional faith and practice, Martin went a long way to discredit the church. His many books were published by Illuminati mind-controller Simon and Schuster, which was a sign that something was fishy....Martin was the secretary to Cardinal Augustin Bea, a Marrano who spearheaded the Schema and a general liberalization of church dogma and practice. According to an article in Wikipedia, Martin passed confidential documents to the American Jewish Committee, which is a front for Illuminati bankers. He also wrote under pseudonyms many inflammatory articles for Illuminati magazines like Harper's describing the foot dragging of Vatican conservatives.

^^^^^^^

Aangirfan relays the latest abuse story to percolate up before our astonished eyes.

A report by a UK parliamentary committee, in 1998, contains a reference to a young boy who was abused by the Roman Catholic church's Christian Brothers (terrifying).
The Christian Brothers competed as to who could be first to rape the boy 100 times.
The boy described being in terrible pain, bleeding and bewildered.
The boy tried to beat his own eyes so they would cease to be blue as the Brothers liked his blue eyes.
The boy was forced to masturbate animals.
The boy was held upside down over a well and threatened in case he ever told.
The fact they acted without shame is terrifying.

Don't look away. That is somebody's child.

^^^^^^^

Meanwhile, the Clash of Civilizations model proscribes that Islam and Christianity destroy each other. This requires a little meddling behind the scenes.

Despite all the fear mongering, however, the Muslims do not pose a threat. The Muslim world has been sufficiently weakened due to their own internal corruption, in addition to the subversive activities the Western powers that, by WWI, the Allied powers were able to brush aside the forces of the Ottoman Empire, which by that time had crumbled to near dust. Since, the Muslim world has been in disarray, incapable of uniting to even represent Islam, let alone defend its cause....Therefore, so as to rile the masses of the Western world against Islam, it has been necessary to artificially foment militancy in the Muslim world, by creating terrorist groups, to create the illusion of Islam’s competition with the “democratic” West.

Check. Now as for the Christians...

...What is meant by democracy, however, is secularism. Because, the goal of the Illuminati had been to separate religion from the state, to replace it with a rule of their own. Through the widespread propaganda of the eighteenth century, they discredited Christianity as conflicting with the findings of science, and defined the Christian Church as an organization rife with corruption and greed. While it is certainly true that the Church was fraught with abuse, the citizens of the West were told to throw the proverbial baby out with the bathwater, for it was not its moral teachings or the common worshipper that were inherently corrupt, but the upper echelons of its politically minded hierarchy.

Now, however, we will see that the Church is, indeed, rife with corruption and greed. And evil. Has this been known for a very long time? Yes indeed. Has it been covered up for a very long time? Oh yes.

Will it be covered up one more time? I'm thinking, no.

The corporate media has decided to cover this scandal quite thoroughly. Note the vigorous journalism applied, in this case. Perhaps we will see a "resurgence" of journalistic standards, at long last, for the task of destroying the Catholic Church. What better topic to reinvigorate the moribund Jewish-dominated media and rebuild their shattered reputations than by taking down the Catholic Church? I mean, c'mon, who wants a Pulitzer Prize?!? As long as they don't go down a few specific dark alleys, this looks like a win win win.

So I think this time it will stick. The Catholic Church will be weakened as much as Islam has been weakened. And that would be just dandy for those with grand plans for world domination.


In The Genesis of Genocide, we learn about the use of scapegoats.

One method to atone for these sins was the use of scapegoats. In each ceremony, two goats were used; one was sacrificed through being slaughtered to appease God's desire for death and the other 'set free' by being sent into the wilderness to carry their sins and guilt and blame away from the Jews and thus redeem themselves at the cost to two 'beasts'. One bears the punishment; the other bears the blame.

Well, I think we have the two scapegoats required to settle the fight for Jerusalem.

Jerusalem (source)

^^^^^^^

Things will come out, and it won't stop with the Catholic Church. Do they really think they can orchestrate a controlled demolition and remain unscathed? It kind of reminds me of 911, pulling down the twin towers of Islam and then Christianity. Watch out Israel. I think you're Building 7.

Do you see all these great buildings? Not one stone here will be left on another; every one will be thrown down. - Jesus Christ