You and I may not have any privacy, but big corporations have lots of privacy. Even when they make terrible mistakes that pollute the air and water and soil that we all share. They don't have to show or tell anything they don't want to, and the government and the giant corporate media just have to sit there and take it. Yes. Totally powerless they are, when it's convenient to be that way.
Like say when something needs to be overlooked for a period of time.
"Critics blast BP for not releasing video showing the extent of the Gulf Coast oil spill. CNN's Ed Lavandera reports."
OK?
Remember the narrative, an X-wars narrative.
First:
And then:
And here we are. Remember, either way we get the Disaster of Biblical Proportions. But the conspiracy to hide the truth helps to affix blame. It also allowed the problem to fester long enough to assure biblical proportions.
CNN is now complaining that BP is controlling ALL video of the spill underwater. And BP won't release it, except for this one little piece. Message control.
But does that really make sense?
So BP controls *all* the video from *all* the robots? How convenient is that? Does BP own the Gulf of Mexico, too? Does the US government not have any pull in this situation, to demand BP release videos or failing that to go and get our own damn video? Don't the American taxpayers have a robot in our budget capable of going down there and taking video. Didn't we put one on Mars?
What if that's a crime scene down there? What are those BP robots doing? What about evidence? I guess we'll never know. How convenient is THAT?
Maybe this is the trouble with allowing 60% of people in the war room to be from BP, and the rest to be from other private companies and US government agencies? No one appears to be able to protect the public interest.
And how could the corporate media allow BP to control the message? At the very least the corporate media could have been COMPLAINING. Again, what about protecting the public interest? I guess that's not the corporate media's job either.
So you see, this finger pointing at BP, deserving as BP is, does not quite cut it, because BP can't get away with message control unless the US government and the corporate media let them.
Recap: Now that the oil has been gushing out for THREE WEEKS, now we're finding out that we have a problem of TRANSPARENCY. The narrative is moving to reveal the conspiracy to withhold information. BP will be blamed.
Regrettably, so much damage has already been done. We have only seen the tip of the iceberg.
Good job Brownie.
Like say when something needs to be overlooked for a period of time.
"Critics blast BP for not releasing video showing the extent of the Gulf Coast oil spill. CNN's Ed Lavandera reports."
OK?
Remember the narrative, an X-wars narrative.
First:
Human Error + Mother Nature = Disaster of Biblical Proportions
And then:
Human Error + Mother Nature + Conspiracy to Hide the Truth = Disaster of Biblical Proportions
And here we are. Remember, either way we get the Disaster of Biblical Proportions. But the conspiracy to hide the truth helps to affix blame. It also allowed the problem to fester long enough to assure biblical proportions.
CNN is now complaining that BP is controlling ALL video of the spill underwater. And BP won't release it, except for this one little piece. Message control.
But does that really make sense?
So BP controls *all* the video from *all* the robots? How convenient is that? Does BP own the Gulf of Mexico, too? Does the US government not have any pull in this situation, to demand BP release videos or failing that to go and get our own damn video? Don't the American taxpayers have a robot in our budget capable of going down there and taking video. Didn't we put one on Mars?
What if that's a crime scene down there? What are those BP robots doing? What about evidence? I guess we'll never know. How convenient is THAT?
Maybe this is the trouble with allowing 60% of people in the war room to be from BP, and the rest to be from other private companies and US government agencies? No one appears to be able to protect the public interest.
And how could the corporate media allow BP to control the message? At the very least the corporate media could have been COMPLAINING. Again, what about protecting the public interest? I guess that's not the corporate media's job either.
So you see, this finger pointing at BP, deserving as BP is, does not quite cut it, because BP can't get away with message control unless the US government and the corporate media let them.
Recap: Now that the oil has been gushing out for THREE WEEKS, now we're finding out that we have a problem of TRANSPARENCY. The narrative is moving to reveal the conspiracy to withhold information. BP will be blamed.
Regrettably, so much damage has already been done. We have only seen the tip of the iceberg.
Up to now, the oil spill in the Gulf -- with the exception of photos of discolored water -- has been mostly abstract. With the disaster finally making itself seen, however, expect the visual media to assume a much larger role now, with a corresponding gut punch to the American public and the political powers that be. (Huffington Post)
Good job Brownie.
Comments
If they can't stop it oil will go up the east coast and the follow the gulf stream right to the British Isles and Europe. They will notice.
As for the hole in the earth who knows. There could be so much oil down there by now they can't see what is going on with the robots. There could be such a gas fume over the hole ships can't get around it without sparking it. Who knows? There must be some reason for the secrecy.
I base that on past screwups that the goverment has been involved and never admitted all the truth at once, if ever.
Have we finally managed to kill the world's oceans?
it seems clear to me that the intent all along was for this to get out of hand. the dithering and foot dragging going on, just incredible. and the quality of solutions offered? let's put a box over it? let's stuff it with golf balls?
it's a joke. it's like the dees illustration of rumsfeld, cheney and bush laughing about the jet fuel causing the towers to collapse. yeah that's a good one. ha ha.
No witnesses to plane leaving Poland or valid explanation why reporters were not put on plane and the Russians say they heard gun shots in the woods where the four pilots crashed after saying they were the only ones on the plane by radio. HHHHHHMMMMMMM\
theflucase.com
i'm sure BP does not want to lose billions. but they were crooked going into this. if it is sabotage, there would be a whole other dynamic in play that would result in strange behavior.
http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=46&contentid=6879
Obama and his senior White House staff, as well as Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, are working with BP's chief executive officer Tony Hayward on legislation that would raise the cap on liability for damage claims from those affected by the oil disaster from $75 million to $10 billion.
However, WMR's federal and Gulf state sources are reporting the disaster has the real potential cost of at least $1 trillion. Critics of the deal being worked out between Obama and Hayward point out that $10 billion is a mere drop in the bucket for a trillion dollar disaster but also note that BP, if its assets were nationalized, could fetch almost a trillion dollars for compensation purposes.
I posted that on my blog and noticed it was # 13666.
There is other satellite imagery being withheld by the Obama administration that shows what lies under the gaping chasm spewing oil at an ever-alarming rate is a cavern estimated to be around the size of Mount Everest. This information has been given an almost national security-level classification to keep it from the public, according to our sources.
it would be nice to know these sources that he has. madsen is former navy and NSA, etc. he's an insider. so i do love his reports but you know, you never know... when i read that i thought, oh sure, it's "almost" national security level info but not quite, and anyway it has been leaked now, so somebody wanted it leaked.
i see this continuing to be an ever-more-horrific disaster that will require the most unthinkable choices. are you seeing that too? you know when they start saying we have "no choice".... that's the signal that they wanted to do whatever the thing is that we have no choice to do.
I am right beside it and frankly not the least bit nervous about leaving this demon infested planet.
yes i remember you said that, and i think it will probably come to that. looks like they want that genie out of the bottle... nukes are good kind of thing? i don't know.
http://market-ticker.denninger.net/archives/2300-What-Are-The-Odds-GS.html
Goldman Sachs, which makes more money from trading than any other Wall Street firm, also disclosed that its traders generated $100 million or more on 35 days during the first quarter and lost money on no days. The firm set a record when it made $100 million or more on 46 days in the second quarter.
No losing days in the entire quarter?
I suspect there are talks at levels between countries going on now. I would sure love to be a fly on the wall. There are countries who have expertise in these matters. Russia, China, Iran, Venezuela, Brazil, Argentina and others come to mind.
I wonder if they will insist on the arrest and trial of maniacs in this crisis? I wonder if the U. S. can't fix it somebody else will! It could lead to war.
What are the chances the rest of the world begins to see the gulf as a threat to it's own existence?
Peasant you are going to have to read my blog once in awhile.
http://www.truthout.org/mystery-disease-linked-missing-israeli-scientist59169
http://www.fornits.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=21555&start=14
i'll be back in the morning.
Once they get their paws on them they also suggest an MRI right away. More dangerous than 1000 xrayss and they load you up with barium. They want to "make sure" there is nothing serious going on in the noggin.
I bet they save the heaviest shock waves for satanic holidays. I am quite familiar with wading through satan's killing fields. I have known people where I had to intervene to get them off these drugs. One man I worked with for years and his wife was a nurse told me his daughter was hyper the school said and he put her on ritalin. She ran away from home at 9 years old.
Nurses are the toughest to help recover. They have read a few books and really think they know some shit.Their ego won't let them realize they have been duped.
I explained to him that I was hyper at 9 also but didn't need italin. He got her off the drug and she eventually became an honor student.
Of course he developed a tumor over his ear from the cell phone and needed surgery and to learn to walk again. He always asked me if I broght my cell phone and I would say not you have yours that is all we need I am not into brain tumors. He would just laugh.
Read the ongoing comments over the months.
One of the last comments was she has had the shot and her daughter and they are not dead yet. When she told me that I said "I am sorry to hear that."
http://www.veteranstoday.com/author/carol/
With the vets if agent orange and DU did not do the job they finish them off at the VA clinics.