10/17/10

rich thick and chocolatey

Today the FBI is not looking too good for ignoring the warnings about David Coleman Headley given to them by his wife at the time.


"I told them, he's either a terrorist, or he's working for you," she recalled saying to American officials at the US Embassy in Islamabad. "Indirectly, they told me to get lost."

However we are NOT seeing much about how Headley repeatedly introduced himself as a CIA agent.

During his interactions in India, Headley frequently introduced himself as a CIA agent.

A limited hangout? Make sure people remember that the FBI fucked up but neglect to remind them that it was probably a CIA operation?

That's not very nice. Then again, we are not talking about very nice people.

Aangirfan has written probably sixty posts about Mumbai.

We have also written a bouquet of posts about Mumbai.

See: unclaimed property, about how no one claimed the mutilated bodies of the Mumbai terrorists in the morgue....
Doctors who conducted the post-mortem said the bodies of the terrorists – especially their faces - were beyond recognition.
Which we deduced meant the skin had been peeled off in strips. That is a known technique of the dark intelligence world. Which also means they were double crossed because someone -- intelligence operatives -- had to have been there to do all that and then leave without a trace.

See: limited hangout Mumbai edition, about Headley's background, and whether he is the missing link who knows the identities of the mysterious "third party" in the attacks...

You know the funny thing about people who have connections, they get a little tone deaf to reality. Those of us *without* connections know very well that if you bankrupt a bar, don't have a degree, and get convicted for smuggling drugs from Pakistan, then you can not reasonably expect to get a good job. That's how life works for us mere mortals. But the connected have different rules. The least you can do is become an informer for the DEA, and then use that cover to plot terrorist attacks. 
Headley, 49, who was born Daood Gilani, the son of a Pakistani father and an American socialite mother, agreed to become an informer for the Drug Enforcement Administration as part of a plea deal after his conviction in 1998 on heroin-smuggling charges.
Law-enforcement and diplomatic officials say they are barred from speaking publicly beyond the court record in the terrorism case against Mr. Headley, who is alleged by American officials to have adopted his Western name in 2005 to make it easier to travel on terrorist missions.
But they acknowledge privately there is the possibility that Headley traveled to Pakistan on behalf of the DEA, which is part of the Justice Department, and used the trips instead as an opportunity to meet with leaders of the Pakistan terrorist group Lashkar-e-Taiba and plot attacks on Indian and Western targets.
You can also hook up with a couple of guys running a visa company, and use that as cover to bring suspicious people into the US. It helps keep the war on terror going.
The Justice Department has also not disclosed much of what it knows about the two immigration companies linked to Headley and a Pakistani-born Canadian, Tahawwur Rana, who is also under arrest in the United States and charged with terrorism.
News reports in the U.S. and India have identified the two men as owners or managers of First World Immigration, which had offices in Chicago, and the Immigrant Law Center, a much smaller company based out of a large air-conditioned market in south Mumbai. Both firms advertised their ability to help skilled and unskilled Indian immigrants obtain visas to enter the U.S.
Federal authorities say they believe that Headley used his connections to the companies as a cover for terrorist surveillance ahead of last year’s attacks in Mumbai, as well as surveillance of the offices of a newspaper in Copenhagen, Denmark, that was condemned by Muslim groups around the world after it published cartoons that depicted the Prophet Muhammed.
Headley’s affiliation with the visa companies raises an even more troubling concern for American law-enforcement officials, because there is the fear the firms may also have been used to obtain visas for extremists to enter the United States and Canada.
News reports in India this month said that at least one of the companies’ former Indian clients has already been deported from the United States after immigration officials here determined that he had false documents.
...The immigration companies put advertisements in Indian newspapers last November, only days before the terrorist attacks in Mumbai, promoting the firms’ ability to help ex-military officers obtain jobs in the United States and Canada.
Allright??!!! If you really feel adventurous, read this to see connections to Mulla Omar, Benazir Bhutto, etc.
All this is totally normal see? He could have been your mailman, no?

See: nobody ever authorized anything wrong, where some people started calling him a "rogue" intelligence operative....

So you see, it's one thing to work for the CIA, even though the CIA says he didn't. Of course they will deny it that's the CIA. But to work for the CIA and then switch sides and become a double agent working for LeT, that's where he went supposedly "rogue." I find it ridiculous that in a culture wading neck deep in Hollywood movies about spies and terrorists that anyone could possibly accept such a simple-minded explanation, but they will. It goes along with all those myths about American Exceptionalism and Patriotism and the whole pail of worms that our Men and Women in Uniform and all those who Serve This Country always and at every moment, at every branch of the complex decision tree in this terror-filled world which has been nurtured for our constant manipulation, the deliberate nature of this work being itself an evil beyond imagining, and yet they always do the right thing even if it's the wrong thing, because "you can't handle the truth," or some such shit like that. And when one gets caught doing something wrong, well, then he or she went "ROGUE." Because nobody ever authorized anything wrong.

I'm sorry was that confusing? Let me simplify: they fucking lie about everything. The CIA. All intelligence agencies. They lie for a living, and yes, they will lie to you, especially to you. It's all for you if you're a patriotic flag waving American. If you liked believing that Muslim terrorists did Mumbai, the lie about Headley being rogue is a little consolation prize for you, so that you don't have to face the truth.

The truth of the matter is that essentially ALL terrorism, certainly all the big jobs, is STATE-SPONSORED, and funded through the proceeds of organized crime, conducted by intelligence people, and then blamed on Muslims or whoever. That's it.

The situation is very bad, but hope remains. Not everyone is in on it. That's the good news.

For example, aangirfan alerts us to "a new book by General Hugh Shelton says a Clinton cabinet member proposed letting Saddam kill an American airman as a pretext for war."

Here's the story excerpted from Salon:


Early on in my days as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, we had small, weekly White House breakfasts in National Security Advisor Sandy Berger’s office that included me, Sandy, Bill Cohen (Secretary of Defense), Madeleine Albright (Secretary of State), George Tenet (head of the CIA), Leon Firth (VP chief of staff for security), Bill Richardson (ambassador to the U.N.), and a few other senior administration officials. These were informal sessions where we would gather around Berger’s table and talk about concerns over coffee and breakfast served by the White House dining facility. It was a comfortable setting that encouraged brainstorming of potential options on a variety of issues of the day.
During that time we had U-2 aircraft on reconnaissance sorties over Iraq. These planes were designed to fly at extremely high speeds and altitudes (over seventy thousand feet) both for pilot safety and to avoid detection.
At one of my very first breakfasts, while Berger and Cohen were engaged in a sidebar discussion down at one end of the table and Tenet and Richardson were preoccupied in another, one of the Cabinet members present leaned over to me and said, “Hugh, I know I shouldn’t even be asking you this, but what we really need in order to go in and take out Saddam is a precipitous event — something that would make us look good in the eyes of the world. Could you have one of our U-2s fly low enough — and slow enough — so as to guarantee that Saddam could shoot it down?”
The hair on the back of my neck bristled, my teeth clenched, and my fists tightened. I was so mad I was about to explode. I looked across the table, thinking about the pilot in the U-2 and responded, “Of course we can ...” which prompted a big smile on the official’s face.
“You can?” was the excited reply.
“Why, of course we can,” I countered. “Just as soon as we get your ass qualified to fly it, I will have it flown just as low and slow as you want to go.”
The official reeled back and immediately the smile disappeared. “I knew I should not have asked that....”
“No, you should not have,” I strongly agreed, still shocked at the disrespect and sheer audacity of the question. “Remember, there is one of our great Americans flying that U-2, and you are asking me to intentionally send him or her to their death for an opportunity to kick Saddam. The last time I checked, we don’t operate like that here in America.”
Here is the list of cabinet members. This was 1997.

We can make an educated guess.

The bankers are the ones who like the wars so much.




From the Feb 15, 1999 issue, Federal Reserve Board chairman Alan Greenspan, flanked by Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin and Deputy Treasury Secretary Larry Summers. Note the subheading about how three men "have prevented a global economic meltdown--so far." (photo: AP)

4 comments:

james griffon said...

I'm sorry was that confusing? Let me simplify: they fucking lie about everything. The CIA. All intelligence agencies. They lie for a living, and yes, they will lie to you, especially to you.

Amen to that. And you can say that again, AP. And again!

A. Peasant said...

so there.

Penny said...

"Allright??!!! If you really feel adventurous, read this to see connections to Mulla Omar, Benazir Bhutto, etc."

Dammit I can't!
Article is unavailable.

I went to check back to an old post I had up, is Mulla Omar connected to the TTP, which assasinated Bhutto?
Just curious?
I know another fellow was. Meshud, but, the CIA came along with a drone and tied that loose end up.
I am thinking Mulla Omar is familiar and connected??

A. Peasant said...

damn, Pen, i don't even remember what that article said. i'd have to go look all that up but personally, i thought Bhutto was killed by a high tech laser weapon. that would implicate DOD people and so forth. here's my theory on it, which is old, but in the meantime i think the argument for X-wars technology has only strengthened:

http://editorseye.com/WordPress/2008/01/04/who-killed-benazir-bhutto/

anyway, i never had all the fake terrorists mullas XYZ straight in my head, so i'm not the best one to ask. i'm sure Aan has something on it though.

legal mumbo jumbo

Disclaimer: The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.

Fair Use: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.