6/24/21

task masters and their feedback loop

Kinda busy the next click but found this unpublished draft from 8/7/2012 that the old school crew will enjoy. Probably half the links are gone, but anyway, here you go...






1) Over in Wisconsin, the latest shooter Wade Michael Page has been identified: former Army with a less-than-honorable discharge, who had been assigned to the psyops units at Forts Bliss and Bragg. 2) The narrative so far quotes "authorities" including SITE and the SPLC, who tell us we may never know his motive for sure. 3) Huffpo for but one example pimps this mystery motive narrative and describes these sources as legit ("SITE Monitoring Service, a Maryland-based private intelligence firm that searches the Internet for extremist activity."). 4) Meanwhile, the public "debates" the meaning of the problem and what to do about it in the "global public square."

If you don't know 90% of what's important about this psyop from these four bits of information, you are hopelessly behind in your auto-didactic education about how the world really works. The remaining 10% can be approximately deduced by reading another three or four dozen news articles, most of which will say the same things, except that they will also, strangely, say a few different things; and your task, if you choose to accept it, is to read everything you can get your hands on about this and find all the discrepancies and curiosities, and figure out which ones must be correct by using your google+fu and your very own brain.

There is an opportunity cost to doing this, obviously, because meanwhile, there are lots of other things that you can be doing with your time. Most people will never bother going to this trouble for anything. There are people in the US who have never spent even an hour of their life investigating 9/11, so don't expect them to put any effort into understanding what happened with Wade Page or Syria. Those are the social engineers' favorite people, because they uncritically accept whatever they are told. But if you go through this exercise a few times, and really dig around, you will discover that the terrorists are all on a big payroll funded by your tax dineros as well as the proceeds of organized crime via the so-called black budgets. And the corporate controlled media, which forms a very critical piece of organized crime, shapes the narrative and through its many agents, feeds back information about which discrepancies need to be enhanced or eliminated. And by this method they have sent many, many innocent people to their deaths.

In the case of Wade Page, his unknown motive does not matter to the social engineers. The social engineers want to get as many separate ethnic and religious groups into the fray and fearing the "other" as possible. If the idea is to promote chaos and division, as the social engineers do all over the world, heated debates and never-ending finger-pointing are a win win regardless of the shooter's intentions.

There are over 600 comments on this one story alone in the "global public square." That would be a WIN for the social engineers.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57487094/sikh-temple-shooting-suspects-motivation-unclear-wisconsin-home-searched-for-clues/

Page did his task and was shot dead. Others take it over from there, including the public. The social engineers use COMPARTMENTALIZATION. Organized crime uses COMPARTMENTALIZATION. 

Social Engineers = Organized Crime

We are talking RINGS.


People have certain jobs to do in rings. They don't know what goes on in adjoining rings, or above their pay grade, and generally speaking, THEY DON'T CARE as long as they get their $$$$. That attitude makes the rings go round and round.

Until people start CARING about the truth, nothing will change. Until people realize that doing their task is absolutely NO GUARANTEE that they will survive the chaos they help to bring about, and actually may lead to their own demise, nothing will change.

The TRUTH is that cooperating with the social engineers leads to indiscriminate death. 

As for curious details, somehow Page, who had never been seen at the temple before, "seemed like he had a purpose and knew where he was going." He ambushed one of the first officers to arrive. All that military training comes in handy. And naturally, the FBI has taken over the investigation -- that's their task -- because this is a case of "domestic terrorism," even though no motive has been REVEALED. Let the people debate, bread and circuses. That's the people's task -- to watch and argue. The social engineers will watch the conversation in the "global public square" and reveal new information as needed to drive the narrative in whatever direction brings on the desired flavor of fear, as we recently noted with the Miami cannibal narrative. Bath salts worked for a couple of weeks, they got that meme going strong, then they switched over to religious delusion. We thought they would go for rabies/chimera virus, but perhaps that is still coming. [mordant chuckles - ed. ]Bible pages magically appeared at the crime scene weeks later -- for whoever is still paying attention that is. Let the rest go to their graves believing in the bath salts, who cares! It is Not Important. As a matter of FACT it helps the social engineers to have lots of people believing the wrong thing, because that increases the chaos and makes them easier to steer into useless cul-de-sacs of "thought" where they can have never-ending arguments managed by the gate-keeping trolls on the payroll. That's what the internet is for. And then other lazy asses can excuse themselves from ever doing any serious research because they claim you can read anything on the internet. They will just stick to the teevee thanks anyway. So details morph as the narrative progresses. They throw something out there, watch the chatter, and tweak as they roll it along. FACTS DO NOT MATTER TO THESE PEOPLE. They just want to manage the herd attention space and get people to assume the position, and all the people for whom facts also do not matter, they willingly cooperate because they don't really care about the truth. For those actually paying attention, any discrepancies can always be chalked up to that little bugaboo Human Error. After all, journalists are people too, you know, no matter how much blood they get on their hands.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57487094/sikh-temple-shooting-suspects-motivation-unclear-wisconsin-home-searched-for-clues/

Speaking of people who just try to "do their jobs" in their compartmentalized lives, ignoring the larger picture and the consequences of helping these grand agendas, because they have to put food on their families like everyone else...or at least have something good on the resume... how about all those people who performed at the opening ceremony of the olympics? Who are these people? They got to act in the ceremonies for the Olympics. EMPLOYMENT. Great stuff. Did not anyone think, during all those rehearsals it must have taken to get these shows together, that some of this stuff was rather creepy? We know, we know, it's just a gig. If you don't take it some other person will. And that is the attitude that has brought countless suffering to the world. Just keep participating and watching and let the world's biggest "harmonically tuned" bell plus assorted visuals stun you into a stupor for easier harvesting. That's your task.

Over in the Bulgaria bombing that Israel blames on Hezbollah, without presenting a shred of evidence, four Israeli witnessess undergo multiple interrogations by the Bulgarian prosecutor's office, as they try to get to the bottom of this. http://www.turkishweekly.net/news/139784/-4-israeli-witnesses-of-burgas-terror-act-interrogated-again.html
The initial lead, purported by Interior Minister, Tsvetan Tsvetanov, was that it has been executed by a suicide bomber, who arrived from abroad. According to observers and terror experts, this lead is looking less and less reliable and the most viable hypothesis is that the perpetrator has been deluded, used as a mule, and has acted under the influence of illegal drugs. Israeli media largely back the above, writing that the young man with light complexion and blue eyes had been blown remotely, while standing between two coaches with Israeli tourists. He had been unaware that he was going to die and had the task to put the explosive on one of the buses. The bomb was placed in his backpack.
Aha, so the Israelis at least understand how this works. They have their sayanim networks and the shabbas goyim doing tasks for millennia already. Discrete compartmentalization is culturally understood. He was doing his TASK, his little task in the greater picture. Just a mule, no clue, probably not a Jew either. And how did that work out for him? Oh see, he got blown up by his handlers because he was not aware that he was going to die. He just thought he would do that one little piece and go off with whatever money he had been offered, or maybe they just drugged him up with scopolamine and sent him over there to do it without hope of any reward. But clearly, if he had blue eyes, he is not the same guy whose picture came out the day after the incident, reportedly the brown eyed Mehdi Ghezali, the Algerian-Swedish jihadi who spent time in Guantanamo. http://www.infowars.com/burgas-suicide-bomber-identified-by-media-as-guantanamo-jihadist-video/ His task was to get his picture taken at the airport, looking menacing and harmless at the same time, so that many people who have since moved on from the story will have that bookmarked in their heads. It's wrong, but who cares. As we keep noting, FACTS DON'T MATTER. The narratives change based on some kind of feedback loop managed by the social engineers. They have their people everywhere, doing their tasks, from the top of the media empire (obviously) down to the trolls and plants monitoring every place that thinking people gather, and through the NSA's spying software.

Everyone is doing their task, and where does this bring us? To the gates of hell. Why do people keep cooperating with the social engineers? Because the social engineers have studied people for so long, and they know how to keep them on the reservation. They have the User's Manual for the Bio-Engineered Human Beings of 2012.

We used to know someone who worked at Goldman Sachs. Just a few short years ago, maybe three, this person could not believe that GS could actually be corrupt, because in *her* job, she had to meet exacting standards. So she reasoned that those standards applied from top to bottom. Is this naive for a very intelligent person? Yes. People are naive. Also, no doubt, she made a good salary, which helped her to see the walls of her cubicle as fuzzy little blankets, keeping her warm and dry and safe. No need to peek over the tops.






22 comments:

bholanath said...

Thanks so much for throwing down this great draft from the past! A little gem, for sure!

A. Peasant said...

Seeing the matrix circa 2012. Weird.

Peter said...

Wow! 2012 when I had my cancer surgery in Mt Sinai Hospital in Manhattan. Strangely, after almost 9 years now, I go to the dentist for an x-ray and voila, the dentists tells me I have radioactive implants in my neck where the surgery was. Surgeons never told me that! Oh well, I muddle through as best as I can. Strangely again, Tommy Lee Jones newest move titled, Wander, comes out a few weeks ago and what is the main theme? Experimental implants surgery on poor defenseless individuals. Go figure. No regrets AP I just know you appreciate the death cults shenanigans so I share with you.

WaffleStaffel said...

I don't know if you're familiar with Miles Mathis. In my estimation, he takes over where Dave McGowan left off, but he shows McGowan up on some things McGowan couldn't possibly have missed.

I don't want to risk dominating your comment section or turning this into a spectator sport, I just thought there were some interesting points to be made about the level of "reality" of some of these events. If you make it down to the second half, this paper deals with the Sikh temple shooting. If you poke around the site he posits some interesting perspective of the JFK and RFK assassinations. I'd be curious to hear your impression some time down the line should you check into it.

The bottom line is the same WRT what goes through people's heads- "who cares! It is Not Important. As a matter of FACT it helps the social engineers to have lots of people believing the wrong thing" -whether you see some of these events as real or as pure theater, there are still many which have definitely cost lives, and the resulting chaos and schism in the public mind is the same. You're so right about how it works, and you articulate it with skill.

http://mileswmathis.com/kingsman.pdf

A. Peasant said...

Hi all. Peter, I certainly do appreciate that. Could it be any easier for surgeons and dentists to deposit tiny things into peoples bodies? And even if they were not on board, there are the medical device companies and dental materials companies to engineer the products accordingly. It really doesn’t take a big stretch to set these things up due to compartmentalization. It’s a key concept to the whole operation.

Waffle, I have read some of miles stuff! I will revert back. No worries on comments, I’m thrilled anyone is still around.

Peter said...

AP i really respect your conclusions. You are always spot on. THanks!!!

A. Peasant said...

I'm glad it makes sense to someone else but me, Peter! :)

bholanath said...

Brief note re: Miles Mathis -
Personal acquaintance here in NM. I don't 100% always agree with his conclusions, but we've had many convos over lunch, been to his house, know him to be high integrity, uncannily multi-talented, a peace- and nature-lover, and good human being. Also scientifically astute and a wizard at genealogical research and obscure historical connections. A phenomenal classical painter/artist. Quirky, like most highly intelligent people.
So looking forward to more posts from you! And sharing with newly-acquired friends from recent months.

A. Peasant said...

Bho, that is astonishing. I haven't read deeply at his place but note he reads very carefully and uses his intuition, and that's basically how to "see" whatever isn't spelled out IMO. So a lot of times conclusions are going to be educated guesses based on those skills and pattern recognition, which means not proven so always room for error. Still, people can get pretty close using these methods. He's a great detective.

Definitely behind here, but I will continue to look for ways to contribute to our collective understanding, and again I greatly appreciate the warm welcome back. It is humbling.

Penny said...

Where to begin?

"If the idea is to promote chaos and division, as the social engineers do all over the world, heated debates and never-ending finger-pointing are a win win regardless of the shooter's intentions."

This is why I avoid "identity politics" like the plague- all of it. The entirety of it's reason for being is to sow discord among the minions while the masters do as they please.

The social engineers use COMPARTMENTALIZATION. Organized crime uses COMPARTMENTALIZATION.

All the time

"People have certain jobs to do in rings. They don't know what goes on in adjoining rings, or above their pay grade, and generally speaking, THEY DON'T CARE as long as they get their $$$$. That attitude makes the rings go round and round.

Until people start CARING about the truth, nothing will change. Until people realize that doing their task is absolutely NO GUARANTEE that they will survive the chaos they help to bring about, and actually may lead to their own demise, nothing will change.

The TRUTH is that cooperating with the social engineers leads to indiscriminate death.


That's about how I see it!

"The remaining 10% can be approximately deduced by reading another three or four dozen news articles, most of which will say the same things, except that they will also, strangely, say a few different things; and your task, if you choose to accept it, is to read everything you can get your hands on about this and find all the discrepancies and curiosities, and figure out which ones must be correct by using your google+fu and your very own brain.

Oh, the reading! Sometimes it's endless to figure out what most probably going on. But it's what you got to do.

Some people ask me- how can you write what you do, year after year?
My answer is always... It's real life and it's vastly more interesting then anything I could find on a mind numbing screen= plus it gives me insights into what and why something is placed on the big screen (or the small screen) Or what direction things are headed.

As for Miles Mathis- I've read him on occasion. He's interesting. But generally choose to stay away from that type of analysis, preferring to keep all my analysis as unique to myself and the information found as possible Not saying he's bad or wrong- Just saying I like to do my own thinking about things. And my husband often helps me to clarify things- or what the word??? Solidify concepts etc

It's good your back AP :)

A. Peasant said...

Hi there, Penny. I think you've been blogging than anyone! Not sure how you've managed to keep going but hats off to you and your husband, and many thanks for staying in the trenches all this time.

WaffleStaffel said...

bholanath - I get the impression of integrity about Mathis, but it's good to hear someone with first hand experience concur. People seem to be polarized about him, but none of the people I've seen criticize him or his papers have ever been willing to dispute the facts. To me, that's telling.

His evolution in thinking, particularly WRT Jews and the power structure, is apparent in his writing. For example his paper on the Kennedy's speculates a dynasty revolving around them, whereas in later work he acknowledges the disproportionate over-representation of Jews in power, then examines Jewish infiltration in European and Asian royalty going all the way back to the Phonecians.

To me it just reflects a stage in the evolution of ones thinking, and it doesn't invalidate the rest of the analysis. I feel some people are very quick to dismiss someone's work if they aren't in perfect alignment with their own understanding, and that's a shame and a cause of a great deal of wasteful infighting. Some people will note Miles' apparent dismissal of the significance of Satanism and the pedophocracy. While I think it's unfortunate, his estimation of the importance of those subjects doesn't negate the vast majority of his work, which is solid, and you've laid out his skills very well.

Penny, you keep chugging along, and your dedication and attention to detail are amazing. You are indefatigable, and you're right, what could possibly be more interesting, or more important?

Peasant, again, it's great to have you back. In your absence I've often wondered what you'd have to say about the things going on. Knowing how you don't suffer fools gladly, I've tried to picture your response to the current situation, where the exits are being chained shut, and people have their ignorance and apathy on full display. I imagine you're a force of nature. I've read over your blogs from start to finish and I've learned a lot, including about how to be more open minded about the outrageous and the inexplicable.

A. Peasant said...

Waffle, I completely agree that people's perspectives change over time and that process doesn't invalidate other stages of the process. it's part of learning. you surely would have noticed this reading earlier posts of mine, many of which are cringe to me now. i used to be a typical lefty. there is some quote over at 911u.org that (paraphrase) when an honest person finds they are mistaken, they can choose to remain honest or they can choose to remain mistaken. i chose to remain honest, and that led to a lot of fallout IRL. totally worth it and wouldn't change a thing if i could do it over, but it's a pretty lonely path in my experience.

WaffleStaffel said...

It looks like Penny's blog was pulled. I guess it was inevitable, but what a huge body of work. You, A13, and Scott Creighton are the only ones I know she communicates with, so I thought I'd check in to see what she does from here. Hopefully she is undeterred.

bholanath said...

A Peasant,
Are you all ok? Would love to hear from you. Hope all is well.
Blessings,
Bholanath

A. Peasant said...

Hi guys, sorry I did check out. Got overwhelmed with info & kind of threw up my hands with all the flaming psyops. It's fucking ridiculous.

I did not know about Penny's blog. Booger has it "under review". Anyone know what she was digging on just before this happened?

WaffleStaffel said...

She was mostly focused on vax side effects and death statistics. I checked her blog every day. Nothing specific stands out, it was basically all of the stuff that's verboten in polite circles.

bholanath said...

Yeah, the mass consumption of the flaming SCI-ops is fucking ridiculous. How was discernment exterminated so thoroughly and quickly? Long-term masterful stink-tank planning and prep, with cost no object?

WaffleStaffel said...

Scott turned me to Penny's (Rose's?) new site. Scott just got booted from youtube a second time. He's on his second blog, but he doesn't write anymore, he does videos.

https://pfyt2.wordpress.com/

WillyLoman/Scott Crighton
nomadiceveryman.blogspot.com/
bitchute.com/channel/americaneveryman/

A. Peasant said...

Bho, yes. And it took a very long time, like our lifetime. I think we are probably both circa 1960s?

Waffle, gotcha thanks very much.

bholanath said...

A Peasant, I just turned 75. Was 16 @ JFK hit/psy-op. My dad (WWI vet) showed me it's all lies even earlier. Been tracking this shit continually ever since, as time permitted.

A. Peasant said...

Bho, your memory is invaluable. My parents were born in the mid-30s and IMO they were pretty naive. My grandparents circa 1900, and i don't think they were naive but i wasn't old enough to have a lot of meaningful conversations about the ways of the world.

legal mumbo jumbo

Disclaimer: The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.

Fair Use: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.