Mr Gambaccini, 63, said he was aware of the necrophilia claims in the eighties. He questioned why newspapers had not acted when he said a reporter had boasted that his colleagues were aware of a story linking Savile to 'necrophilia'. His comments astounded presenter Nicky Campbell who tried to stop the conversation by warning the allegations were not in the public domain. Campbell said: 'That particularly lurid accusation that you have just brought to people's attention is one that has not been in the public domain.'http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2221922/Jimmy-Savile-necrophiliac-says-colleague-Paul-Gambaccini.html#ixzz2AOuTy6Az
Paul Gambaccini, colleague of Savile
Jack Nicholson as The Joker
Oopsie we don't want people to know that we all here in media world knew for decades... ?
'He targeted the institutionalised, the hospitalised - and this was known. Why did Jimmy go to hospitals? That's where the patients were.'OK ARE YOU WITH US SO FAR? This is in the Daily Mail. This guy, Gambaccini, worked with Savile. A colleague.
Now here comes the Limited Hangout. He has admitted so far that people knew that Savile preyed on children and corpses, shocking the presenter.
Mr Gambaccini continued to say today that Savile's alleged abuse was taking place at a time when staff failed to get to grips with the concept of paedophilia. 'It was considered so far beyond the pale that people didn't believe it happened,' he said during the 5 Live Breakfast Show. He said the entire society was taken in by Savile - 'including the Prime Minister who invited him to Chequers; including the royal family, photographed with him, he got a knighthood in this country, he got a papal knighthood. 'This is not just the BBC this is history, this is a man who conned an entire society,' Gambaccini added. It also emerged earlier this month that Savile denied claims he was sexually attracted to corpses in an interview in 1990, after he admitted taking pleasure in taking the deceased to Stoke Mandeville Hospital mortuary. The hospital, where Savile worked as a volunteer and had his own room, said that it has never received claims that Savile 'inappropriately interacted' with corpses. A spokesman said: 'We are not launching an investigation into claims that Savile was a necrophiliac. We have never received any complaints as to that nature.' 'During our time, to the best of our knowledge, Jimmy was not given free access around our clinical areas and whenever he attended the hospital he would give advance notice and usually be in attendance with his fundraising team.'Aha. So. Let's get it straight then.
Savile fooled everyone, the ENTIRE SOCIETY. People knew he was preying on children and dead people, but they just couldn't wrap their minds around the pedophilia and necrophilia, so they just did nothing? They refused to believe it happened?
Still tragically fooling everyone then, in 1999?
Alternatively, you can believe that his behavior was intentionally covered up because there is a culture of pedophilia and total corruption in the halls of power.
Talk about conspiracy theories. So, Pick One.
Furthermore, the hospital has "never received claims" about Savile's abuse of corpses.Well please tell us, WHO WAS GOING TO FILE A CLAIM? The dead? Were the corpses going to complain? He always gave advance notice and attended with his fundraising staff? SO.... what? Nothing could have happened because he was always there with his staff? The staff who covered for him and allowed the hospital to say it never received any complaints?
How stupid can this possibly get? This is all they have now. They just want to limit the damage as much as possible. Limited Hangout. It was just Jimmy and the rest of them were Pure As The Driven Snow.
British police investigating alleged sexual abuse by the late Jimmy Savile said today some 300 victims had come forward and they were preparing to make arrests in a scandal that has thrown the BBC into disarray. Detectives said they had been staggered by the number of people who had come forward since the late broadcaster's crimes were first revealed just over three weeks ago. The head of the BBC's governing body called the allegations a "tsunami of filth", and police said Savile, one of the BBC's most celebrated TV stars, was "undoubtedly" one of Britain's most prolific sex offenders ever. ...The revelations have generated huge attention, not least in the United States where Entwistle's predecessor at the BBC, Mark Thompson, is poised to take over as chief executive of the New York Times.Boy those detectives must be staggered by the number of victims that must have been ignored by other detectives in the past. And no doubt Mark Thompson and some other people are sweating bullets. Thompson is expressing "regret" already as he tries to claim that as former DIRECTOR GENERAL of the BBC, he really had no idea that Savile was being investigated, by the BBC, and how on earth did that investigation get pulled...? Hot damn it's a real mystery how these people paid so much money manage to not know the darnedest things, but not to worry, Mr. Sulzberger, who owns the NYT, is satisfied that Thompson is Hereby Insulated from any unpleasant consequences of the rampant corruption and cover up being exposed at the BBC and environs, and Thompson is expected to start his new job running the NYT on 11/12/12....
Mark Thompson, wearing an expression we have seen before... ?
Yup, pretty sure it was this asshole.
Yesterday, lawyers representing some 30 alleged victims of abuse told Reuters their clients said other celebrities were involved, while some of those abused by Savile have told the media they were targeted on BBC premises....He said they were investigating three categories of offences; those that involved just Savile which made up the vast majority of cases; those involving Savile and others; and those which had no direct link to Savile. At this stage there was no evidence of any organised paedophile rings and offenders appeared to be opportunists, Mr Spindler added. He revealed that a retired officer had come forward to say he had investigated Savile in the 1980s over allegations of indecent assault but there had not been enough evidence to pursue a prosecution.
More bullshit there. No evidence of any RINGS. Are we to believe that none of these victims ever reported a thing? That none of them, all these years, none of their parents, nobody, ever tried to REPORT THE ABUSE TO THE AUTHORITIES?
They trot out the 'no evidence' over and over. They scrub the evidence, and then they say there's no evidence. See: Exposure
People have said they tried to report the abuse but they were ignored or intimidated into silence. Aangirfan has reported on this the entire month of October 2012, outstanding coverage, and the posts and comments are FULL OF EVIDENCE for anyone interested. Where are all the intrepid reporters who want to get a Pulitzer Prize, hmm? The establishment is not going to give a prize for exposing the establishment. So that's why this only appears in the Conspiracy Blogosphere, where we are all crazy. Despite all the evidence to the contrary. Someone commented at Aan's, somewhere, that he never believed it until an acquaintance showed him a picture, in his possession, of Savile naked in bed with some children. Evidence that never made it to the light of day, just kept as a personal item because probably, the authorities were not interested. So there's plenty of evidence and plenty of victims, and they have been around for decades, being IGNORED by the authorities, while Savile, just ONE of countless pedophile predators, went about his business with complete impunity.
And the news organizations are very very busy trying to keep this thing from flashing over.
How does this happen? Because there is a culture of Pure Driven Snow and everyone is so Good and Naive in the halls of power and in the media, or because there is a culture of Corruption. So widespread as to defy belief. And they are now going to try to put one million pounds of shit into a five pound bag by claiming that it was just a few people, and everyone else was really very sweet and honest to God, they just couldn't wrap their minds around the things they heard and saw so they just clutched their pearls and Did Nothing.
And it is implied that You Would Have Done The Exact Same Thing. Because you love your celebrities and politicians and your media whores. You can't believe they would be vile, despicable predators and cowards, could you? After tuning in to watch them so many times? You reference them you are symbiotically joined to them in your mental programming. They love you you love them. RIGHT? How can you separate what YOU would do with what THEY would do? It's all the same. Kiss kiss hug hug....?
Top Talent Superstar with Lots of Adoring Fans
Because People are Obviously Very Discerning
And even if they did do some things that might disappoint you, there would have to be a good reason....?
Like Human Error....?
We all put our pants on one leg at a time.
The pressure was too great.
I wanted to help but I just couldn't do anything.
I saw someone else try to do something and terrible things happened to him.
I could have lost my job.
I had to turn away and pretend I knew nothing.
Anyway, they blackmailed me, so I had No Choice.
You would have done the exact same thing.
Is that true? Would YOU dear reader have done nothing if you knew that powerful people were raping children, brutally raping them and in some cases killing them? Threatening them and their families? And it was all being covered up, for decades? Not just in the UK but around the world? Would you do it just to save your job, for money? Along with the drug trafficking weapons trafficking human trafficking, general murder and mayhem, every stripe of corruption you can think of plus all the stuff that never crossed anyone's mind until some disgusting creeps shat it into the world and now there are things in the Urban Dictionary that we just shudder to think are COMMON KNOWLEDGE among Generations X&Y, and we know the social engineers have destroyed culture when many people consider depravity no big deal. When it just goes on a t-shirt for a few laughs.
Because depravity, on a scale that Changes Everything, is exactly what is being uncovered, and now we all have the opportunity to see if we are going to PRETEND WE DON'T KNOW because it is easier, because we don't want to BELIEVE that people in power are this corrupt...
OR, are we going to WITNESS for our fellow human beings who have suffered the abuse.
People keep saying they want change. Well, it's actually pretty easy. All you have to do is follow the evidence until it takes down every corrupt politician, celebrity, judge, cop, media whore, social worker, et cetera. And you have to expend some effort meaning you can't just sit on the couch and watch teevee and call it a day.
It could go down like a house of cards if enough people loved the truth more than the status quo they keep bitching about.
image from zoliblog.com