a possible scenario - with updates

"Albert Pike is to Freemasonry what Shakespeare is to Drama."
 ~ From the way-back machine.

Further from the same link:

First they eliminate all "documents" - not that a oral secret society such as Freemasonry or the KKK keeps a paper trail. Then they say no documents exist or none can be found. [See: exposure, no evidence, plenty of evidence] If there is any eyewitness testimony included in books or writings on the topic they deny the books or writings exist, if that fails they attack the witnesses and try and destroy their character - even if they were masons and thereby ignoring their oaths on the matter, and if that fails they attack the character of the authors themselves - again if they also too were masons. Finally they will simply lie or mischaracterize the nature of a book or writing by terming it 'anti' - even if the work was 'pro' but written in another time before the fall of the KKK. The use of the term "anti" is one of pure Orwellian rhetoric. All those who write critically of Freemasonry are anti's and all anti's are frauds, liars, zealots, or extremists and cannot be accepted. Therefore there is no such thing as a legitimate work criticizing Freemasonry because by it's very nature it must be 'anti' and organized Freemasonry will accept no references from 'anti's' in any debate or discussion of Freemasonry.
Something we have noted before...
It is very important in particular to note the importance of EVIDENCE, or LACK OF EVIDENCE. We have noted this many times, how people demand PROOF of various allegations....How easy is it to make the evidence go away? It's very easy when organized crime has at it's service the military, the media, and people highly placed in governments and bodies throughout the world. ~ exposure

Freemasory is Judaism for gentiles.

Masonic monument in Israel

Albert Pike was the head of the supreme council of freemasonry starting in 1859, for 32 years. He wrote a letter dated 8/15/1871 laying out the three world wars required to bring about the One World Order. If you have never read about this letter, we will leave it to you to click through and read about it. His predictions for WWI and WWII are accurate, or perhaps we can more accurately say that events transpired according to his direction.

His instructions for WWIII:
"The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time."

Pike... putting world events in context since 1871...? [UPDATE: Maybe not. See Aangirfan's latest post and also here, debunking the Pike letter as cited.]

Step one: Destroy Israel and Islam. Well we see Islamic countries getting destroyed one by one, but so far Israel has escaped destruction. War with neighbors Syria and Lebanon will not leave Israel untouched. That much has been promised. Picking a war with Iran, that Israel cannot execute alone, will not leave Israel untouched.

Inexplicably, Netanyahu never stops trying to pick wars that will get Israel destroyed unless Team NATO steps in.

And yet we hear from multiple corporate media sources that the big players of Team NATO have supposedly warned Israel to stand down or go it alone. So they have been told. If Israel starts something, ALLEGEDLY, if we are to believe these reports, their "friends" in Team NATO will not pull their obnoxious asses out of the fire. And Israel would be destroyed...? Seems hard to believe, but then again, looking at the Pike instructions, which have already been followed for two world wars...we can't be too sure.

General Dempsey with Obama

Meantime, Iran's nuclear weapons are a false pretext, as anyone paying attention has known for years. This is really about MONEY. The money woes drive the timetable. The people in power need to retain control over the world populations via currencies. That requires control over oil. Oil = petrodollars = control. The alleged nuclear targets in Iran are probably oilfields and production facilities.

Iran was among the few nations to have escaped this global privatization scheme. Iran had its own oil. It managed to avoid the trap of letting its currency be devalued by speculators by imposing foreign exchange restrictions and price controls on its national currency (the rial), something it could afford to do because it had adequate foreign exchange reserves from its oil sales....Islamic scholars have been seeking to devise a global banking system that would serve as an alternative to the usury-based scheme now in control internationally, and Iran has led the way in devising that model. Iran is characterized as a democratic Islamic republic, which enforces Islamic principles not only morally but legally and politically. ~ Ellen Brown, Behind the Drums of War with Iran: Nuclear Weapons or Compound Interest, 11/13/2007

Iranian oil fields

Meantime, options are rapidly running out for the fed. So this whole business about swinging from one vine to the next without falling (the Tarzan Principle, explained by James), ie: collapsing the currency on cue and unrolling a new currency, also on cue, and controlling both major events under cover of some geopolitical catastrophe such as a manufactured war, really poses a challenge to the evil people who currently rule the world. We figure they have been wanting to pull this off for years now, and for various reasons they just can't get all the vines lined up. [UPDATE  - The fed has pulled the trigger on QE3. The countdown begins.]

So, war conditioning continues apace. We see the ridiculous over-reaction to the alleged killing of a diplomat in Libya: US warships entering the area. It's one thing for Team NATO + Israel to literally destroy Libya and murder tens of thousands of innocent people, and kill their leader, and install terrorists for a government -- all of that is Perfectly OK. But when an American diplomat dies, it's an act of war and an outrageous Breach of our SOVEREIGNTY. [UPDATE: A Jim Stone report into the matter reveals that there IS NO official US Embassy in Benghazi. Was the whole thing made up out of whole cloth as a pretext to move warships off the coast and get special teams on the ground? Are the photos from one of the sets used to create news? We cannot find a single image of this supposed Benghazi embassy from before the attack. Well anyway, don't expect the warships to be called back.]

[UPDATE: Obama skipped all his PDB (daily intelligence briefings) in the week leading up to the attack. Goes with the unheeded warnings 48 hours before. Hmm. Shades of GWB before 9/11... who could have imagined blah blah blah...]

kiss kiss hug hug

“Instead, when our grounds are being attacked and being breached, the first response of the United States must be outrage at the breach of the sovereignty of our nation.”  ~ Romney

Riiiight. Anyway, what we think the message oozing out of corporate media will shape up to be after some massaging: poor innocent Americans caught between crazy Jews (like the Jewish Israeli American with 100 Jewish donors who made the film) and crazy Muslims (like the crazies who supposedly freaked out about it, months later, on cue)...? The pushback against Israel -- expected and deserved -- has been woven into the dialectic. [UPDATE -- Check out the micro-expressions on Victoria Nuland as a journalist actually challenges her to explain the difference between public and private diplomacy over Iran. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wfakxBNJZg]

See: Aangirfan and one of the source documents here:

Reportedly, the Neocon faction (Romney, Netanyahu) gains from the attack on the US consulate in Libya.

Reportedly, the Trilateral faction (Rockefeller, Brzezinski, Obama) loses.

"From the very execution of this false flag in this particular manner we can lean that the Neocon faction seems to be gaining the upper hand from the trilaterals in the power struggle over who controls the rogue network - deep state apparatus...
In our opinion, "National Security" has traditionally been an issue of advantage for the Republicans. When we see "National Security" threatened, we expect the Republican to gain traction. We agree with the analysis that the events strengthen Romney, despite his idiotic remarks. Since when has being an idiot precluded election to president? [UPDATE: Romney's key foreign policy advisors: Rich Williamson, former aide to John McCain; Missouri Senator Jim Talent; John McCain; Dan Senor; Condoleeza Rice; Jim Baker; Mitchell Reiss (source)]


This leads into a hypothetical scenario, Step One, whereby something very bad happens in the Middle East, involving Israel, Syria and probably Lebanon, and then events are fortuitously prevented from becoming all out war, thanks to the great restraint of generals in the US, Russia and China. They have hinted as much. This leads into Step Two.

Step Two: Provoking a Formidable Social Cataclysm. Most of the world finds themselves very grateful not to be vaporized. Grateful to the military, not to politicians. Nonetheless, the brinksmanship and terror of this conflict spreading into global war easily causes enough chaos to quickly take down the petrodollar. Since the fed needs to be replaced by another power of different name but same function, we see this as the actual goal of the entire geopolitical operation. The economic distress paves the way for the new world currency, presumably to be backed by gold. Who has a lot of gold? Reportedly, China. With the worst crisis -- global nuclear war -- averted, there is plenty left to fight about: Israel's destruction. The Arab World's destruction. The United State's destruction. The economy's destruction. What kind of New World should we have, with what kind of currency, ETC. Stress & relief, stress & relief, stress & relief. In other words, expect "a formidable social cataclysm."

And, we should add, timing is everything. Does a war go down before the election or after? Who makes that decision? People in the deep state. Who controls the apparatus of the deep state? That is the question.

After some time of horror, with many people dying, the banksters hope we end up with a new world currency. The banksters want to restart their clock with the new gold-backed currency -- the names and players all having changed but nothing having actually changed in terms of control.

(Also see: pony business)

Catch 22, also known here as WIN WIN.

How do the people of the world avoid this type of outcome?

final pic: note the guy with the RED BEARD in Bangladesh
A calling card?


this is so much easier

This is a social engineer at work planning a nice neat future for the globalists.


This man, Michael Strong, talks about the SOLUTION to the PROBLEM of POVERTY. What causes poverty? According to Strong, "Poverty is due to poor legal institutions." Hmm. We think there might be more to it, such as massive debt and fiat currencies, massive corruption, suppressed technology, weather modification, wars, disease, terrorism, drugs weapons and arms trafficking, and control of natural resources -- all controlled by globalists. Not to mention that the people who make the laws and enforce the laws are paid off by globalists, so that is very much a downstream problem -- poor legal institutions. We have exactly the laws that the globalists paid for. What is the solution, according to Strong? Private cities. Well, actually, "FREE" cities.

Or, as he terms it, ANARCHO-CAPITALIST PARADISE. Therein, he believes, lies the moral-intellectual high ground over the socialists, who, tragically, through "intellectual error," have not been able to eradicate poverty.

Because PRIVATE = FREE in our Orwellian world. Do you want to be a FREE slave in a brand new PRIVATE city, controlled by globalists through their own directly-selected law enforcement goons? Doesn't that sound better than being an unfree slave in one of the many dilapidated, run down cities that already dot the globe, which are also controlled by globalists through their proxy goons in the "poor legal institutions"?? Hmm. Tough call, but the people of Honduras will have the choice.


The plan's backers say it's the ONLY WAY to kick-start development in the troubled country. In other words, we have NO CHOICE. (That is an interesting old post there from three years ago, talking about Honduras and Iran and the NO CHOICE TELL.)

However, critics warn that it could mark a return to the dark days in Honduras when US companies controlled the government, owned vast tracts of territory and ordered police to massacre striking workers – an era which prompted political scientists to coin the term "banana republic".

We think the critics have it right.

In recent years, Honduras has attempted to diversify its economy away from bananas and coffee, to include exports of clothing and car parts. But a massive wave of violent crime, triggered by drug cartels and savage street gangs known as "maras" [ie: terrorists on the payroll operating in the geopolitical black holes - ed.], has stunted economic growth, and even prompted analysts to talk of the country as a failing state.
Opponents claim outsourcing the government's responsibilities to the private sector will only further undermine the rule of law and weaken Honduras' democracy, which remains fragile following a 2009 coup. Edmundo Orellana, a former attorney general and member of congress, has warned that the charter cities would allow "multinational corporations" to establish "protectorates" by stealing sovereignty from citizens.

That is the point.

Honduras sets stage for 3 privately run cities   

The model cities will have their own judiciaries, laws, governments and police forces. They can even sign international agreements on trade and set their own immigration policies. How convenient is that?

Who needs countries anymore and the messy problems of moving all the damn people off the precious resources, and all the lying and murdering and problems involved with glossing over all that necessary business, when globalists can just build their own brand new private cities made to order? 

This Is So Much Easier.

"Tyrone, you know how much I love watching you work, but I've got my country's 500th anniversary to plan, my wedding to arrange, my wife to murder and Guilder to frame for it; I'm swamped." ~ Prince Humperdink

Of course, not everyone is happy. The INDIGENOUS PEOPLE, the Garifuna, do not want their ancestral lands to be "handed over to foreign capital." We have written about indigenous people many times before. They are the mortal enemies of the social engineers because they know how to live off the land and have strong families. They don't NEED globalists to build them cities. They NEED globalists to leave them alone and stop killing them and stealing their land. But Strong says not to worry. The president of Honduras will appoint "globally respected international figures," and they will make sure that it's all run by the book. And once it is all running there will be plenty of fake democracy so the people can vote and pretend to change things just like we do here in the Big Democracy Up North.

And so forth, every four years...wasting incredible amounts of time and money...

As an aside, we don't know why they can't just use some of the many ghost cities already built? Maybe after we have some happy success stories about the private cities in Honduras, that will be the use for the ghost cities? 

Here are the "globally respected international figures:"

The new Model Cities will have their own police force, and will enlist a highly-reputable policing authority to train police officers and hold the police leadership accountable for fair and effective policing [BLACKWATER types? - ed.]. In addition, there will be an audit committee that is overseen by a Transparency Commission, which is an independent body, with the power to gather and evaluate such information and statistics on crime rate, and the efficiency in handling of crimes by the legal system, as well as police misconduct.
Honduran President Porfirio Lobo appointed the initial members of the Transparency Commission:
  • George Akerlof - Professor of Economics at the University of California at Berkeley, Senior Resident Scholar at the International Monetary Fund, and Nobel Prize Winner
  • Harry Strachan - Former President of INCAE Business School, Director Emeritus at Bain & Co., and Managing Partner at Mesoamerica Partners and Foundation in Cost Rica
  • Ong Boon Hwee - Former Chief Operating Officer of Singapore Power and Former Brigadier General in the Singapore Armed Forces
  • Nancy Birdsall - President and Co-Founder of the Center for Global Development , former Senior Associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and former Executive Vice President at the Inter-American Development Bank [also worked at the World Bank - ed.]
  • Paul Romer (Commission Chair) – Professor of Economics at the New York University Stern School of Business [social engineer - ed.]
Coalianza stated that Phase 1 will begin in October, and later on, factories will be built and equipped. 90% of the workforce is to be Honduran.

Click through those bios and ask yourself, HEY, WHAT COULD POSSIBLY GO WRONG?

More good info and analysis at this link.

The three regions mentioned as possibilities for model cities are:  near Puerto Cort├ęs, the Agalteca Valley or the Sicaya-Paulaya valley near Puerto Castilla, and Choluteca. According to COALIANZA, it must be located near to both an airport and a port. Hernandez told the press:

"It should be noted that these model cities will be established in depopulated areas of Honduras.  It does not imply the displacement of people or social groups."

None of these regions is completely vacant. Reading between the lines, what Hernandez is saying is that there are no large cooperatives or powerful landowners in these regions, groups that might vocally protest the expropriation of the land on which they live and work. 

...We were unable to locate any information on MKG Group, though the Michael Strong in question is, we believe, the Michael Strong associated with FLOW and the Free Cities Institute. Strong formed the Grupo Ciudades Libres LLC, a Nevada Company, with Kevin Lyons in 2011.

Another group that claims to be involved is the Future Cities Development Corporation, one of whose founders is Patri Friedman, grandson of Milton Friedman, nobel laureate in economics. This group has previously been linked by The Economist to the Model Cities project in Honduras.

Hernandez said that the main funding partner of the project, whose identity will be revealed later, is a Canadian company that has been investing in development regions worldwide for the last 15 years, but he would not identify the company.

There are globalists ALL OVER THIS PROJECT.


Bring a bucket.

Where will people turn after the cities of the world have been looted ransacked and otherwise destroyed by chaos? To the welcoming arms of private cities?

It's a trap.

The answer to poverty requires dismantling the globalists. Stop everything they do: manipulating the weather, causing droughts and floods and destructive storms. Stop the manufactured war on terror causing dislocation and mass murder of innocent people, destroying their land and means of supporting themselves. Stop the pollution of the globalists giant corporations and industries, including nuclear. Stop their evil media, NGOs and think tanks. Stop the organized crime drug running, human trafficking, gun running. Stop the poisoning of the populations through food, air, water and "medicine." Stop the usurious fiat currencies and let countries start their own currencies based on the only real asset that exists -- healthy, productive and educated populations, who know how to make things and take care of each other.

If countries were truly sovereign, and could have their own currencies based on the productive capacity of their populations, it would be in their interest to have healthy, educated, vibrant populations. All else would follow. The true solution runs in the exact opposite direction that the globalists would have us believe.

Making private globalist owned cities is not a solution to anything except the globalists problem of keeping control.

legal mumbo jumbo

Disclaimer: The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.

Fair Use: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.