track two treachery

"Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (R) holds an umbrella for former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger against the rain to see him off after a meeting in Beijing, capital of China, Oct. 12, 2009. Kissinger and his delegation came to Beijing for the inaugural China-U.S. Track Two High-Level Dialogue, which gathered dozens of retired eminent diplomats and officials from both countries. (Xinhua/Yao Dawei)

Track Two diplomacy is a special type of diplomacy social engineering when supposedly "neutral" people, like former diplomats and members of think tanks, get together off-line and try to iron out problems affecting nation states. These people don't have the same constraints as public officials, so the thinking goes that they can speak freely and make better progress. Of course, people conducting track two diplomacy are also not ACCOUNTABLE to the public. So theoretically, if everyone was a former this-or-that in a track two diplomacy meeting, one might argue that such meetings are ethical, since no one has direct access to the levers of power.
However in this case, the former officials from the US side are meeting with the CURRENT OFFICIALS on the Chinese side. 
Sorry but that does not qualify as track two diplomacy.
Why should unelected former officials, ie: PRIVATE CITIZENS, with PRIVATE INTERESTS, be meeting with current Chinese officials to shape policy? Policy that affects billions of people?
One long-time Track II practitioner simply describes what he does as "practicing foreign policy without a license."  http://carnegie.org/publications/carnegie-reporter/single/view/article/item/136/


Henry Kissinger and his delegation inaugurated a high level ("track two") diplomacy with Chinese officials in 2009. They met in Beijing in 2009, Washington in 2010, and just this past week again in Beijing.
The US delegation included former secretary of state George P. Shultz, former secretary of the treasury Robert Rubin and former US chairman of the joint chiefs of staff Michael Mullen...."These officials will surely brief the current administration when they return home. Besides, some US officials, like Kissinger and Shultz, who worked in think tanks, will influence public opinion through their organizations," Qu said.

Oh indeed. SOCIAL ENGINEERING after the fact.

"Vice-Premier Li Keqiang meets former US secretary of state Henry Kissinger on Tuesday at the Great Hall of The People in Beijing. Kissinger led a delegation of prominent former diplomats attending the China-US Track Two High-Level Dialogue. [Ren chenming / China News Service]"

Just a year ago, China's CURRENT Foreign Minister met with Henry Kissinger. And the next day Hillary Clinton said: "We are preparing diligently for the upcoming state visit by President Hu Jintao. It is very much anticipated and looked forward to, and both the minister and I feel a great sense of responsibility to ensure that it continues the positive, cooperative, comprehensive relationship between our two countries."

In the West, track-two diplomacy refers to non-official dialogue often involving academics and think tanks.
The purpose of the dialogue is to enhance communication and educate the public on foreign policy, according to Sun Zhe, a professor on US politics at Tsinghua University.
"In the West..." track two diplomacy refers to non-official dialogue involving academics and think tanks, but is there a different definition in the East? Because it sure seems that there must be a different definition to account for the fact that current Chinese officials are having these policy discussions with former US officials. We think everyone is just not supposed to notice the tremendous conflict of interest?

We can't find the complete list of the Kissinger Delegations. Evidently, it is not a matter of public record. That's because these people don't represent the public. But you can be sure that whatever they are discussing, it will affect people world wide.

Kissinger Delegation members may include Robert Rubin, "formerly" of Goldman Sachs and the US Treasury. Jami Miscik, "formerly" of the CIA (Intelligence Chief) and Lehman Brothers. Carla Hills, longtime political adviser, current advisor to JP Morgan and member of the CFR,

People like Robert Gates and Mike Mullen, "formerly" of the DOD.
"U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates (L) and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen (R) arrive at a hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee March 31, 2011 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. The hearing was to examine the ongoing military operation in Libya. ( - Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images North America)"

A few months after the 2010 meeting, Obama hosted Chinese President Hu Jintao and had a state dinner inviting, among others, Henry Kissinger, Madeline Albright, Jamie Rubin, Howard Berman, Lloyd Blankfein, Zbigniew Brzezinski , et al.

Cheers. Or should we say, mazel tov.



MOSCOW, Jan. 21 (Xinhua) -- Visiting former U.S. secretary of state Henry Kissinger and Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin discussed global issues Friday, and vowed to enhance ties between the two countries.

Without giving details of the talks, Putin's spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the "private meeting" lasted some 40 minutes, local press reported Saturday.

Interfax news agency said Kissinger described the bilateral relations as "of key global importance" and expressed hope they would keep improving.

The pair met frequently in recent years, as Kissinger once called Putin "extremely intelligent" in 2007, while Putin said in 2006 that the two can "understand each other well" and can find compromise.

Russian media noted that Friday's meeting came just weeks before the March 4 presidential elections, in which Putin is seeking a third term as president.
In 2007, the Kissinger Delegation met Putin. 
Former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger flew to Moscow this week with a bunch of neo-conservative heavyweights, for a deliberately concealed meeting with Russia's President Putin.

Kissinger's delegation included former Secretary of State George Schultz, former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, former Special Representative for Arms Control, Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Thomas Graham, former US Senator Sam Nunn and Chevron Oil Company chairman and chief executive officer, David O'Reilly.
News of the meeting has been suppressed or ignored by most of the mainstream Western media but was reported in Russia.  But the exact contexts retain an aura of mystery.

Only a brief comment by Kissinger after the meeting was reported: ``We appreciate the time that President Putin gave us and his frankness.”


When will the world be delivered from this creature, and the many others, who live to ripe old age as they suck the life-blood out of humanity?

Former US secretary of state Henry Kissinger arrives with his wife, Nancy, for the state dinner     [Jonathan Ernst/Reuters] January 2011


parasites on the move

Interesting landmarks in China's neighborhood:

Strait of Malacca

Paracel and Spratley Islands

Sulu Archipelago

Oil and Gas Deposits


"Rothschild, the more-than-200-year-old family-controlled banking dynasty, is making a big move in China, and Yu is leading the charge. It plans to add 15 merger advisers there by March, giving it 55 in all, more than any foreign investment bank, says Olivier Pecoux, co-chief executive officer of Rothschild. Today, the merger business in China is still relatively small. So far this year, China has accounted for about 9 percent of the $1.1 trillion in deals around the globe, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The potential, though, is enormous. China has $2.5 trillion in untapped foreign currency reserves and is mandating that state-owned companies expand abroad to secure natural resources such as oil and metals. "The economic balance of power has already changed, and it is moving to the East," says Yu, whose title is head of greater China. "There will be an increasing number of Western companies selling assets to China.""
AUGUST 5, 2010

The bankers made a decision to move the balance of power to the East, led by China. In exchange, China has made some concessions to the bankers pet country?

September 2011, Haaretz: 'China will not stop Israel if it decides to attack Iran'


"Of course we understand that Iran aims to acquire nuclear weapons and we are concerned about this," said Prof. Yin Gang. "While it declares that its nuclear program is intended for peaceful purposes, the Chinese government and intelligence services believe that Iran wants to build a nuclear bomb." This clear statement was made by an independent Chinese expert on the Middle East who recently visited Israel at the invitation of Signal, an organization that furthers academic ties between Israel and China.


To underscore China's unique diplomatic policy, Yin made the following surprising statement: "China is opposed to any military action against Iran that would damage regional stability and interfere with the flow of oil. But China will not stop Israel if it decides to attack Iran. For all these reasons, Israel and the Middle East need a country like China. Israel needs China's power."

China opposes any military action against Iran
that would damage regional stability and interfere with the flow of oil.
Any and all military action against Iran
would damage regional stability and interfere with the flow of oil.
THEREFORE China should oppose an Israeli attack on Iran.
But China will not stop Israel if it decides to attack Iran.
According to Professor Gang.
"Israel needs China's power."
China's economic power.

Is Professor Gang representing the Chinese government? Allegedly no. But he visited Israel in September 2011, along with more than a dozen other Chinese academics, at the invitation of SIGNAL, where they met with dozens of influential Israelis and had a grand time. You can read about the visit HERE:

The event was extraordinarily successful as all of the scholars noted that they had gained important insights into the others nation, mind-set and culture.  Many said their pre-existing views were greatly changed or even turned upside down. Many of the participants commented that this was a rare and refreshing opportunity to investigate an entirely new field of International Relations on an academic level that of China and Israel.
With a focus on intellectual excellence and benefiting from a palpable respect for one another’s ideas and perspectives, the panels served as a forum for valuable interaction.  Both sides showed commitment to sharing knowledge and acquiring new understandings. p.3
Oh we bet.

Key governmental and research institutions in Israel represented at the symposium? Oops, not available.
Sponsors? Oops, not available.
Agenda? Oops, not available.

But it was all extraordinarily successful, you can be sure. Which should come as no surprise. After all, the love fest between Israel and China has been going on for a few years, a bit on the QT.

China has also managed to penetrate the Israeli market. The China Civil Engineering Construction Corporation (CCECC) is tasked with digging the Carmel Tunnel....The huge Chinese construction corporations are state-owned. This means that anyone who does business with them is in effect doing business with the state and with the Chinese Communist Party. 

Prof. Marvin Samuels, who divides his time between Israel and China, and has been following relations between the two countries for many years, says that, "In the past year, Israel has received amazing positive spin in China." Samuels, an adviser to the Chinese Ministry of Communications and a lecturer at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, points out that this trend is reflected in news reports in both the governmental and semi-independent media, "and in tremendous interest on the part of senior politicians as well as corporate executives. If Chinese companies have begun to do business in Israel, it is very probable that senior officials in the Chinese politburo gave them the green light to do so." ...In Tel Aviv's light-rail project, CCECC holds 25 percent of the shares in the consortium undertaking the work. Other members include the Lev Leviev's Africa-Israel Investments and the German company Siemens, which will be in charge of the electro-mechanical work and will supply the trains.

..."I keep hearing compliments about the ancient culture of the Jewish people and the old tradition," says Nadai, who took up his post in China about a year ago, "and about the ability to build a modern country out of them in a span of 60 years. These comparisons make the Chinese feel close to us: They, too, have a glorious tradition and they, too, are trying to develop a modern country quickly. They feel that they have something to learn from us.

"Only recently a large team of Chinese state television employees visited Israel for a period of three weeks, to research the 'Israeli miracle.' Now they are visiting several places in the world that used to have large Jewish communities, in order to examine the Jewish community's influence on its surroundings. Their idea is to try to decipher the secret of the Jews' success."

Nadai says that, "as a diplomat who has served in other countries in the past, I can say that there are no parallels today to such an attitude toward Israel and the Jews

October 2011: Israeli business incubator launches in China
Business, defense/security and academic alliances between tiny Israel and mammoth China are growing daily, helped along by private Israelis providing liaison packages. The Changzhou Industrial Incubation Initiative is one of these. Zvi Shalgo, chairman of the Israeli Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai, founded the PTL Group in 2000 to offer Israeli companies -- many of them exporting high-tech products -- logistics, manpower and financial services to gain a foothold in China. It's cheaper to do business in China than in the US, partly because 80 percent of the vast Chinese market is condensed around three major cities, requiring fewer point people.

Also see these posts documenting the cozy relationship between Israel and China:

George Soros recently said that China would be the world's next major economy, replacing the US economy. So a strong China is in the cards, but only if it is under the CONTROL of the international bankers. That's the trick.

It looks like a pretty simple equation.

Did somebody say Russia? No, we didn't think so.


pony business

"By studying people’s reactions to a range of artificially-generated faces, Oosterhof and Todorov were able to identify a set of features that seemed to engender trust. Working from those findings, they were able to create a continuum: faces with high inner eyebrows and pronounced cheekbones struck people as trustworthy, faces with low inner eyebrows and shallow cheekbones untrustworthy."


Very interesting research.

In 2005, Todorov's lab garnered international headlines with a study published in Science demonstrating that quick facial judgments can accurately predict real-world election results.
Taking what they have learned over time -- namely that, rightly or wrongly, people make instant judgments about faces that guide them in how they feel about that person -- the scientists decided to search for a way to quantify and define exactly what it is about each person's face that conveys a sense they can be trusted or feared.

...Based on this data, the scientists found that humans make split-second judgments on faces on two major measures -- whether the person should be approached or avoided and whether the person is weak or strong.
[We noted in the last post that damage to the amygdala causes people to lose their ability to make the split second judgment whether to approach or avoid a person:

Humans with marked lesions of the amygdala, loose the affective meaning of the perception of an outside information, like the sight of a well known person. The subject knows, exactly, who the person is, but is not capable to decide whether he likes or dislikes him (or her). Limbic System: The Center of Emotions
Also see the study by Oosterhof and Toderov: "Although participants did not engage in explicit evaluation of the faces, the amygdala response changed as a function of face trustworthiness."]

Back to the Science Daily article from 2008:
From there, using a commercial software program that generates composites of human faces (based on laser scans of real subjects), the scientists asked another group of test subjects to look at 300 faces and rate them for trustworthiness, dominance and threat. Common features of both trustworthiness and dominance emerged. A trustworthy face, at its most extreme, has a U-shaped mouth and eyes that form an almost surprised look.

Notice the eyebrows.

"more great news for Ron Paul fans" -- oh you bet...
"A trustworthy face, at its most extreme, has a U-shaped mouth and eyes that form an almost surprised look."

High inner eyebrows? CHECK.
Shallow indentation at the bridge of the nose? CHECK.
Pronounced cheekbones? CHECK.
Wide chin? CHECK.
U-shaped mouth? CHECK.
Eyes that form almost a surprised look? CHECK.

Over at Winter Patriot Community the discussion continues about Ron Paul in the comments. In one of our comments we note that Ron Paul does not elucidate his position on some very important details about the money supply, and who would issue the nation's money supply *AFTER* the Federal Reserve is ended, which Ron Paul supports (and so do we), should that come to pass. But what happens NEXT? This is the problem. What happens after the Fed? What replaces the Fed? WHO issues the money, and how, and by what mechanism?

How important is this detail? It makes all the difference in the world. It makes all the difference whether the banksters have another 100+ years to control our every transaction, and our children and grandchildren etc., starting from scratch; or whether we get a currency backed by the productivity of the people, and controlled by the people's fairly elected representatives (yeah that's another huge problem we know), as James has thoroughly and clearly explained in his post -- here it is again if you haven't read it yet.

It is impossible to overestimate how important this is, but Ron Paul has not made his position clear. There is a GAP in his position, and you can't just fill it in with whatever you *think* he *should* do, or *will* do, because you like him, because he has such a trustworthy face. Capice?
people who like rp will be inclined to fill in the blanks with a story they like. this is a very common way that people are manipulated. important information is omitted and people color in what *they* would do, what *they* want. only later do they find out they were wrong. and there is nothing more infuriating than when someone screws you and then says, hey i never told you i was going to buy you a fucking pony. and you realize they sure didn't say that. you just assumed you were getting a pony because he knew how much it meant to you, and there was so much sweet talk...

You can start to believe you are getting a pony when you get it in writing from the man that you are getting a pony, and you go to the stable and pick out the pony, and you see the fucking pony and give it a carrot, and you hold the pony's reins in your hand, and you have a couple hundred million angry friends with pitchforks who also want ponies, and who will pay extremely close attention to all this pony business.

And even then, you still can't believe you're getting the pony until your hero delivers the actual pony, and before a tragic, unforeseeable, regrettable fire burns the barn down the night before.

All you Ron Paul supporters, you need to check into this pony business right away. We can't say it any nicer. You've got to get the details down in writing, exactly how things will work *AFTER* the Fed, and it has to be an answer that cuts the bankers out once and for all. And it has to be public. Because if you don't do that, and something happens to Ron Paul, you have NOTHING. Nothing to wave around, nothing to enforce, nothing to justify, nothing to fight for, nothing to play Rule of Law with the people who invented the game. You have walked right into the trap, and you have taken everyone with you.

Just look at the whinging over the Palestinians getting into UNESCO -- a good example of how having some legitimacy, of being able to ENFORCE ACCOUNTABILITY, even just a little bit, makes their ears bleed.

And if Ron Paul doesn't give you this, you need to understand what that means. And don't say it's because he's afraid of getting whacked by the banksters, because we all already know that they will kill any leader who tries to do this thing that needs to be done. That is precisely WHY it needs to be explained clearly to the public, and put in writing, and committed to. Because if they dare to whack a leader who has gone public with the CORRECT SOLUTION, then they they are exposed for the murderous criminals we already know they are, but at least they would be exposed in front of everyone.

So, good luck with all that. Anyway, cheer up, we know how it feels. We thought we were getting a pony a few times in our life. We really, really believed it.



born and bred in the slave factory

We received some excellent comments and links from the last post. Many thanks to our brilliant friends and blogmates. We want to unpack the ideas more fully.

This particular piece of information might be the key to some mysteries?

When the limbic system was stimulated the patients vigilance weakened, they lost capacity to think, often they began to undress or grope and when the stimulation stopped they did not remember it. SOURCE
The limbic system affects behavior and memory. If the limbic system could be dialed up and down by some methods, people would experience a range of behavior and memory states? This would be very useful to the controllers, especially if done by secret methods, without people's consent?

Is this possible on a wide scale?

Well, look at what the limbic system regulates:
Limbic system structures are involved in many of our emotions and motivations, particularly those that are related to survival. Such emotions include fear, anger, and emotions related to sexual behavior. The limbic system is also involved in feelings of pleasure that are related to our survival, such as those experienced from eating and sex.

Certain structures of the limbic system are involved in memory as well. Two large limbic system structures, the amygdala and hippocampus play important roles in memory. The amygdala is responsible for determining what memories are stored and where the memories are stored in the brain. It is thought that this determination is based on how huge an emotional response an event invokes.
Seeing what the limbic system regulates, and knowing how the social engineers love to play with our emotions, and realizing how much research is conducted with black budgets, we expect they have figured some things out by now.

Can the limbic system of many people be affected by RFR technologies and/or vaccines with adjuvants that cause brain inflammation (ie: brain damage)?

Has this happened? Is this happening? 


Are people in America thinking clearly? We don't think so.

Let's take one example of public discourse: Newt Gingrich. Newt Gingrich has been around a long time. He's a pretty despicable person, which is not a state secret. Yet Newt Gingrich is still taken seriously as a political leader in 2012? Why is that? We heard it's because everyone has by now gotten used to the idea that he's a sociopath, and his skeletons have whitened in the sun for ten years, so it's No Big Deal anymore. Lucky for him hmm?

And somehow, Newt Gingrich knew that he could waltz back into politics and be taken seriously.
In the 1986 the American Air Force issued a book "Low Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology". In the foreword Newt Gingrich, member of the U.S. House of Representatives writes: "The United States is on the verge of a dramatic change in its ability to cope with low-intensity conflict... This book is a serious effort to make thinking about and working on low-intensity conflict easier, more understandable and more effective.

"He believes that what he says in public and how he lives don't have to be connected." 

See: don't let that stop you

Newt with his three wives.

Not only does Newt Gingrich BELIEVE that he can say anything, Newt Gingrich KNOWS that he can get away with it. Because Newt Gingrich KNOWS what sorts of military technologies are being applied to the American people....? Newt Gingrich knows that people don't remember his past, and even if they do, they don't care about the sordid details....? As evidenced by the facts on the ground: the fact that people are still, unbelievably, taking Newt Gingrich seriously in 2012...?

Newt Gingrich, who enjoyed decades of power in Congress, knows about military research into low intensity conflict, and he approves. Is it any wonder.

And not to pick on Poor Newt Gingrich, because he is just one example of the bottom-dwelling opportunists who pass for serious leaders in America.

Of course, many people conclude the SOLUTION to the PROBLEM of bad politicians is better politicians, people like Ron Paul for instance. But we are veering off into another major topic, covered HERE (including comments).

To be perfectly clear, we stopped voting some time back, because we concluded that it was USELESS to participate in a MASSIVELY CORRUPT SYSTEM.

We think politics is a big playpen to keep many millions of people busy and entertained and pouring their money and energy into activities that will never actually benefit them. We also consider that politics keeps a much smaller number of people EMPLOYED off of these many millions who don't actually benefit.

...Only a person of strong character can have a chance at standing up to the MASSIVE SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION endemic in our society. If you don't understand the scale of corruption, you won't see the problem. That is why the controlled media does not talk about the true scope of corruption. They prefer to keep as many people in the playpen as possible. People stay in the playpen as long as they think that voting will make a difference in their lives.

That is why we write about ORGANIZED CRIME -- to reveal the scale of the problem. If you don't understand that the entire system is MASSIVELY, SYSTEMICALLY CORRUPT, you won't understand that politics is a complete waste of time.

Just in case anyone thinks we are suddenly picking on Poor Ron Paul. Not so. We checked out of the playpen some time back.

We think Ron Paul is helping to keep many intelligent, angry people IN THE PLAYPEN, where they can still be controlled and directed to an APPROVED SOLUTION.

We think the answer is to check out of the playpen.


In the experiment referenced, stimulation of the limbic system led to mindless sexualized behavior. When the stimulation stopped, the subjects did not remember what they did.

Stimulating the limbic system would certainly be helpful in monarch programming.

Monarch slaves are mainly used by organizations to carry out operations using patsies trained to perform specific tasks, who do not question orders, who do not remember their actions and, if discovered, who automatically commit suicide. They are the perfect scapegoats for high-profile assassinations (see Sirhan Sirhan), the ideal candidates for prostitution, slavery and private movie productions. They are also the perfect puppet performers for the entertainment industry. ...The levels of Monarch Programming identify the slave’s “functions” and are named after the Electroencephalography (EEG) brainwaves associated with them....BETA is referred to as “sexual” programming (slaves). This programming eliminates all learned moral convictions and stimulates the primitive instinct, devoid of inhibitions.

"The levels of Monarch Programming identify the slave’s “functions” and are named after the Electroencephalography (EEG) brainwaves associated with them."

Monarch programming creates highly specialized slaves using torture and an understanding of how the human brain works. Presumably, the scientists and programmers stimulate the limbic system to make their programming "stick".... ?

What happens when the limbic system is damaged? An opposite personality pattern emerges.

In Roger's case, his limbic system was damaged by a type of encephalitis. Severe inflammation caused massive brain damage. Roger's limbic system was impaired, and this resulted in him being happy and compliant, but with severe memory problems.

stimulated limbic system ==> aggressive, sexualized behavior?
depressed limbic system ==> indifferent, compliant behavior?
stimulating or depressing the limbic system ==> memory problems?

Experimental destruction of both amygdalas (there are two of them, one in each hemisphere) tames the animal, which becomes sexually non-discriminative, deprived of affection and indifferent to danger. The electrical stimulus of these structures elicits crises of violent aggressivity. Humans with marked lesions of the amygdala, loose the affective meaning of the perception of an outside information, like the sight of a well known person. The subject knows, exactly, who the person is, but is not capable to decide whether he likes or dislikes him (or her). Limbic System: The Center of Emotions

Changing a person's limbic system without informed consent? WIN WIN WIN.


How can the limbic system be changed?

Inflammation caused Roger's brain damage, particularly to his limbic system.

Inflammation of the brain must be taken very seriously.

Let's look at the childhood vaccine schedule.

"Numerous parents report taking their healthy child to the doctor, getting a barrage of vaccinations, having their child run a high fever, and their child never again being the same. THAT IS THE REAL PROBLEM THAT PARENTS SEE WITH THEIR OWN TWO EYES."
vaccine ==> high fever ==> personality changes
inflammation ==> brain damage ==> personality changes


Vaccines contain weakened "signatures" of a disease. By themselves they are not strong enough for the immune system to mount a response. This problem is solved by adding a "booster" compound called an adjuvant. An adjuvant does not contain any signature of the disease. Rather, the adjuvant initiates an inflammatory reaction (the first step in any immune response). The idea is to get the immune system revved up so that it can see the weakened disease and learn what it looks like so that if it ever sees it again it will be more prepared to fight it. This concept, in and of itself, has validity – but only given the right set of circumstances.

It is clear that those with autism have an excessively inflamed brain. If pressed, the CDC would likely argue that the brain inflammation is a result of the autism and that they need more studies to determine the cause. I will argue that they don't need any more studies at all and that the cause is blatantly obvious based on an understanding of existing science. The multiple inflammatory insults from the adjuvant in vaccines, at a rate of 1 in 150 cases, sets the brain on fire and causes autism. As an aside, and to a lesser extent (but just as important to society), a minor brush fire causes ADHD and impaired intelligence.

All vaccines contain adjuvants because adjuvants are part of vaccine science. The adjuvants cause inflammation ON PURPOSE, so that the body makes the immune response to the weakened disease.

At the same time, we are told the vaccines are SAFE.

But adjuvants cause brain inflammation, and babies are given DOZENS of vaccines, which all contain adjuvants. Brain inflammation may lead to brain damage and personality changes. Of course, the argument goes that this is necessary to save our children from the horrible childhood diseases of the past, diseases like POLIO, which you can read about at Jennifer Lake's blog. It is certainly REGRETTABLE that some children suffer brain damage from the vaccines, we are told, but it's a risk we must all take....?

Why is that? Because people are more afraid of the horrible childhood diseases than they are that their babies might be getting brain damage from the adjuvants in vaccines....? And because they believe these regrettable side effects are rare....?
Of all the organs of the body, the brain is the most susceptible to oxidative degradation, commonly referred to “lipid peroxidation.” Although an infant’s brain receives 15 percent of normal cardiac output, it utilizes nearly 25 percent of the body’s oxygenation. [13] As elevated oxygen levels in the environment bring increased risk of explosions or fire, comparable physiological risks exist in the brain. ... In essence, the brain might be compared with highly inflammable dry grass or brush enclosed in an area with elevated oxygen levels, needing only a spark to set off a conflagration of inflammatory lipid peroxidation. In all likelihood, vaccine adjuvants provide this spark far more often than generally realized. SOURCE
Also see: The Non-Disclosed and Hyper-Allergenic Vaccine Adjuvant
Also see: Michael Belkin Testimony to Congress, 5/18/99

The Mechanism of Encephalitic Damage from Vaccines

The fact of the matter is that it is a matter of record that it was known that vaccinations produced encephalitis since 1926. The sensitization of the population was being enhanced by vaccination programs. Someone had to know, since the connection was a matter of record....We also know that encephalitis, whether caused through disease or as a result of vaccination, can cause demyelination of the nerves, and that this has been known since the 1920's. Since the developmental neurobiology of the human brain has not changed, but the AMA statement has, we can only conclude that they are deliberately and knowingly, at the top levels connected in bed with the pharmaceutical companies, allowing brain damage to be continually perpetrated on the population in order to provide the basis for long-term medical profit treating subsequent medical and neuropsychological results.
How many people have suffered brain damage as a result of vaccines? Nobody knows. Does the government, big pharma, or the countless doctors pushing vaccines on young and old alike have ANY INCENTIVE WHATSOEVER to answer such a question?

What if someone suffered just a "little" brain damage? What if this took place when the person was an infant or toddler? How would anyone know? How do you know that your child does not have brain damage from a vaccine? And yourself? Roger had massive brain damage, and yet he seemed normal in many respects, "a stark reminder that the territories of Roger's brain which are damaged, including the limbic system, are not critical for a broad range of basic life functions and behaviors."

What if you were robbed of your full human potential and you didn't even know it?

See: The Epidemic of Mental Illness: Why?
See: The Illusions of Psychiatry
See: Andreasen Drops A Bombshell: Antipsychotics Shrink the Brain

When pieced together, this is a story of drug treatment that, over the long-term, causes long-term harm.The other reason this is such a bombshell is that antipsychotics are widely prescribed now to children, often to control their "behavior," and to adults with bipolar diagnoses.

How else can the limbic system be changed?

"Probably many things that can be done chemically could also be done electrically. With the right electromagnetic field, for example, you might be able to produce the same effects as psychoactive drugs". SOURCE
The technology exists. The military has been conducting research for many decades.

At mindjustice.org, we read the following conclusions:

Remote mind control could now be a classified and potent military capability. The first field of research to connect is the almost fifty years of US/Russian scientific controversy over nonthermal emr effects, the strictly classified research of emr weapons and the US/Russia emr arms race. The second field of research to connect is the 1960s CIA “supersecret behavioral-control project,” described as a “program [that] was a full-scale one and just as secret as the earlier MK-ULTRA project.” The CIA said it had a “roomful of files on electromagnetic and related techniques to alter behavior and stimulate the brain,” but the CIA would not release the information and it is still classified.
This research might be under the name NK-ULTRA, as noted in this congressional testimony in 1998:

Walter Hess, back in the early 1920's to 1940's, started working with electrodes within the brain, not just on the surface. He was able -- and this is in a book that anyone can get from the library. I went to my library and pulled it out. "A cat's sudden changes in behavior startled him. The tiny surge of electricity in the cat's hypothalamus, a part of the limbic system, turned the gentle animal into a ferocious beast." Hess discovered he could also control the animal's heartbeat and breathing. He was controlling an animal's heartbeat and breathing in 1940. He won a Nobel prize for this technology in 1940. Unbelievable? It's written, it's documented. José Delegro -- Delgado -- I said his name right. Another scientist came along. He took up where he left out. He did the exact same thing, but by use of telemetry. Wires were not needed. He implanted, used implants. Started in 1950, he was doing this research. Suddenly, we have a break. We don't hear much anymore. Did somebody drop the ball? We're not looking into the mind? I don't think so. It's when an undercover CIA got into it. If you've heard of NK-ultra. It's not talked about.
Never heard of it.

We are reminded of Russel Tice, an NSA whistleblower during the Bush Administration. Remember him? Remember back before Obama was in, how people thought Obama would clean house and we'd finally find out what that bastard Bush was up to, spying on everyone? Grim laughter. Russel Tice said:

"There's no way the programs I want to talk to Congress about should be public ever, unless maybe in 200 years they want to declassify them. You should never learn about it; no one at the Times should ever learn about these things. But that same mechanism that allows you to have a program like this at an extremely high, sensitive classification level could also be used to mask illegality, like spying on Americans."
People speculated what Tice was talking about, but he sort of dropped off the radar and then Obama came in and forgot to clean up all those messes left by Bush, surprise surprise surprise. We guess people mostly FORGOT about Russel Tice. But what were these programs that the public should never learn about, because they are so disturbing, that are beyond the pale of human imagining?

Could have to do with these secret technologies that control people's emotions through frequencies, the wet dream of the social engineers?

The latest development in the technology of induced fear and mind control is the cloning of the human EEG or brain waves of any targeted victim, or indeed groups. With the use of powerful computers, segments of human emotions which include anger, anxiety, sadness, fear, embarrassment, jealousy, resentment, shame, and terror, have been identified and isolated within the EEG signals as ‘emotion signature clusters.' Their relevant frequencies and amplitudes have been measured. Then the very frequency/amplitude cluster is synthesized and stored on another computer. Each one of these negative emotions is properly and separately tagged. They are then placed on the Silent Sound carrier frequencies and could silently trigger the occurrence of the same basic emotion in another human being. P. 205

slavery in America, a long tradition

legal mumbo jumbo

Disclaimer: The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.

Fair Use: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.