calling all witnesses

They want to pretend that Savile fooled everyone.

Mr Gambaccini, 63, said he was aware of the necrophilia claims in the eighties. He questioned why newspapers had not acted when he said a reporter had boasted that his colleagues were aware of a story linking Savile to 'necrophilia'. His comments astounded presenter Nicky Campbell who tried to stop the conversation by warning the allegations were not in the public domain. Campbell said: 'That particularly lurid accusation that you have just brought to people's attention is one that has not been in the public domain.'

Paul Gambaccini, colleague of Savile
Jack Nicholson as The Joker

Oopsie we don't want people to know that we all here in media world knew for decades... ?
'He targeted the institutionalised, the hospitalised - and this was known. Why did Jimmy go to hospitals? That's where the patients were.'
OK ARE YOU WITH US SO FAR? This is in the Daily Mail. This guy, Gambaccini, worked with Savile. A colleague.

Now here comes the Limited Hangout. He has admitted so far that people knew that Savile preyed on children and corpses, shocking the presenter.

Mr Gambaccini continued to say today that Savile's alleged abuse was taking place at a time when staff failed to get to grips with the concept of paedophilia. 'It was considered so far beyond the pale that people didn't believe it happened,' he said during the 5 Live Breakfast Show. He said the entire society was taken in by Savile - 'including the Prime Minister who invited him to Chequers; including the royal family, photographed with him, he got a knighthood in this country, he got a papal knighthood. 'This is not just the BBC this is history, this is a man who conned an entire society,' Gambaccini added. It also emerged earlier this month that Savile denied claims he was sexually attracted to corpses in an interview in 1990, after he admitted taking pleasure in taking the deceased to Stoke Mandeville Hospital mortuary. The hospital, where Savile worked as a volunteer and had his own room, said that it has never received claims that Savile 'inappropriately interacted' with corpses. A spokesman said: 'We are not launching an investigation into claims that Savile was a necrophiliac. We have never received any complaints as to that nature.' 'During our time, to the best of our knowledge, Jimmy was not given free access around our clinical areas and whenever he attended the hospital he would give advance notice and usually be in attendance with his fundraising team.'
Aha. So. Let's get it straight then.

Savile fooled everyone, the ENTIRE SOCIETY. People knew he was preying on children and dead people, but they just couldn't wrap their minds around the pedophilia and necrophilia, so they just did nothing? They refused to believe it happened?

Still tragically fooling everyone then, in 1999?

Not one person ever reported anything to the police, over decades? Because, surely, if even ONE PERSON had reported these crimes to the police, it would have been stopped? But everyone was in such a state of shock that they just remained in denial, and allowed the man to con an "entire society" even up to the prime minister and the royal family? That is what you are being asked to believe.

Alternatively, you can believe that his behavior was intentionally covered up because there is a culture of pedophilia and total corruption in the halls of power.

Talk about conspiracy theories. So, Pick One.

Furthermore, the hospital has "never received claims" about Savile's abuse of corpses.Well please tell us, WHO WAS GOING TO FILE A CLAIM? The dead? Were the corpses going to complain? He always gave advance notice and attended with his fundraising staff? SO.... what? Nothing could have happened because he was always there with his staff? The staff who covered for him and allowed the hospital to say it never received any complaints?

How stupid can this possibly get? This is all they have now. They just want to limit the damage as much as possible. Limited Hangout. It was just Jimmy and the rest of them were Pure As The Driven Snow.


That will be a tall order, keeping everyone else clean, now that over 300 victims have come forward. Looks like some arrests will have to be made, some arrests of RELATIVELY LOWER LEVEL PEOPLE so that the assholes in the corner offices can claim their plausible deniability.


British police investigating alleged sexual abuse by the late Jimmy Savile said today some 300 victims had come forward and they were preparing to make arrests in a scandal that has thrown the BBC into disarray. Detectives said they had been staggered by the number of people who had come forward since the late broadcaster's crimes were first revealed just over three weeks ago. The head of the BBC's governing body called the allegations a "tsunami of filth", and police said Savile, one of the BBC's most celebrated TV stars, was "undoubtedly" one of Britain's most prolific sex offenders ever. ...The revelations have generated huge attention, not least in the United States where Entwistle's predecessor at the BBC, Mark Thompson, is poised to take over as chief executive of the New York Times.
Boy those detectives must be staggered by the number of victims that must have been ignored by other detectives in the past. And no doubt Mark Thompson and some other people are sweating bullets. Thompson is expressing "regret" already as he tries to claim that as former DIRECTOR GENERAL of the BBC, he really had no idea that Savile was being investigated, by the BBC, and how on earth did that investigation get pulled...? Hot damn it's a real mystery how these people paid so much money manage to not know the darnedest things, but not to worry, Mr. Sulzberger, who owns the NYT, is satisfied that Thompson is Hereby Insulated from any unpleasant consequences of the rampant corruption and cover up being exposed at the BBC and environs, and Thompson is expected to start his new job running the NYT on 11/12/12....

Mark Thompson, wearing an expression we have seen before... ?
 Yup, pretty sure it was this asshole.

Yesterday, lawyers representing some 30 alleged victims of abuse told Reuters their clients said other celebrities were involved, while some of those abused by Savile have told the media they were targeted on BBC premises....He said they were investigating three categories of offences; those that involved just Savile which made up the vast majority of cases; those involving Savile and others; and those which had no direct link to Savile. At this stage there was no evidence of any organised paedophile rings and offenders appeared to be opportunists, Mr Spindler added. He revealed that a retired officer had come forward to say he had investigated Savile in the 1980s over allegations of indecent assault but there had not been enough evidence to pursue a prosecution.

More bullshit there. No evidence of any RINGS. Are we to believe that none of these victims ever reported a thing? That none of them, all these years, none of their parents, nobody, ever tried to REPORT THE ABUSE TO THE AUTHORITIES?

They trot out the 'no evidence' over and over. They scrub the evidence, and then they say there's no evidence. See: Exposure

People have said they tried to report the abuse but they were ignored or intimidated into silence. Aangirfan has reported on this the entire month of October 2012, outstanding coverage, and the posts and comments are FULL OF EVIDENCE for anyone interested. Where are all the intrepid reporters who want to get a Pulitzer Prize, hmm? The establishment is not going to give a prize for exposing the establishment. So that's why this only appears in the Conspiracy Blogosphere, where we are all crazy. Despite all the evidence to the contrary. Someone commented at Aan's, somewhere, that he never believed it until an acquaintance showed him a picture, in his possession, of Savile naked in bed with some children. Evidence that never made it to the light of day, just kept as a personal item because probably, the authorities were not interested. So there's plenty of evidence and plenty of victims, and they have been around for decades, being IGNORED by the authorities, while Savile, just ONE of countless pedophile predators, went about his business with complete impunity.

And the news organizations are very very busy trying to keep this thing from flashing over.

How does this happen? Because there is a culture of Pure Driven Snow and everyone is so Good and Naive in the halls of power and in the media, or because there is a culture of Corruption. So widespread as to defy belief. And they are now going to try to put one million pounds of shit into a five pound bag by claiming that it was just a few people, and everyone else was really very sweet and honest to God, they just couldn't wrap their minds around the things they heard and saw so they just clutched their pearls and Did Nothing.

And it is implied that You Would Have Done The Exact Same Thing. Because you love your celebrities and politicians and your media whores. You can't believe they would be vile, despicable predators and cowards, could you? After tuning in to watch them so many times? You reference them you are symbiotically joined to them in your mental programming. They love you you love them. RIGHT? How can you separate what YOU would do with what THEY would do? It's all the same. Kiss kiss hug hug....?

Top Talent Superstar with Lots of Adoring Fans
Because People are Obviously Very Discerning

And even if they did do some things that might disappoint you, there would have to be a good reason....?

Like Human Error....?

We all put our pants on one leg at a time.
The pressure was too great.
I wanted to help but I just couldn't do anything.
I saw someone else try to do something and terrible things happened to him.
I could have lost my job.
I had to turn away and pretend I knew nothing.
Anyway, they blackmailed me, so I had No Choice.
You would have done the exact same thing.

Is that true? Would YOU dear reader have done nothing if you knew that powerful people were raping children, brutally raping them and in some cases killing them? Threatening them and their families? And it was all being covered up, for decades? Not just in the UK but around the world? Would you do it just to save your job, for money? Along with the drug trafficking weapons trafficking human trafficking, general murder and mayhem, every stripe of corruption you can think of plus all the stuff that never crossed anyone's mind until some disgusting creeps shat it into the world and now there are things in the Urban Dictionary that we just shudder to think are COMMON KNOWLEDGE among Generations X&Y, and we know the social engineers have destroyed culture when many people consider depravity no big deal. When it just goes on a t-shirt for a few laughs.

Because depravity, on a scale that Changes Everything, is exactly what is being uncovered, and now we all have the opportunity to see if we are going to PRETEND WE DON'T KNOW because it is easier, because we don't want to BELIEVE that people in power are this corrupt...

OR, are we going to WITNESS for our fellow human beings who have suffered the abuse.

People keep saying they want change. Well, it's actually pretty easy. All you have to do is follow the evidence until it takes down every corrupt politician, celebrity, judge, cop, media whore, social worker, et cetera. And you have to expend some effort meaning you can't just sit on the couch and watch teevee and call it a day.

It could go down like a house of cards if enough people loved the truth more than the status quo they keep bitching about.

image from zoliblog.com


the illusion of privacy in a limited hangout world

With a few keystrokes, it is now possible for an investigator to determine a target’s location, activities, finances, sexual orientation, religion, politics, habits, hobbies, friends, family, their entire personal and professional histories… even accurately predict what they will do and where they will go in the future. Without leaving the office, a government agent can surveil a subject and “watch” their activities 24/7/365: where they drive, when they walk down the street, if they attend a church or synagogue or mosque or a demonstration or visit an abortion clinic or a “known criminal activity location” or meet with a “targeted person” or a disliked political activist. There is no longer any place to hide. Follow The Money: Privacy, A Postmortem
So... does that include pedophiles? Or are they some sort of protected group?

Because there is no privacy.

Certainly no online privacy.

So how do the pedophiles get away with it?

...and human beings are prisoners...

What makes some people so Hard To Catch in a world where privacy is just an illusion?

The illusion of privacy -- something to keep in mind at all times, and especially when hearing statements along the lines of Who Could Have Imagined..... Because just like when that despicable shrew Condi Rice uttered her smarmy excuses before congress, the crimes had already been imagined, planned, executed and covered up by the time we heard her pathetic regrettables. She was just lying. Lying about the deaths of thousands of people, which led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people. And she got away with that. no problem, because she told the lies to other liars in power and then the media whores, also liars, did nothing about it.


Aangirfan has posted at length about Jimmy Savile, the pedophile predator. At the beginning when the news about Savile started to break, we saw the usual treatment on the internet. In the comment section the hue and cry about 'Why are all these people coming forward now when the poor guy can't defend himself BLAH BLAH BLAH they must be lying....'


Because Who Could Have Imagined? Has nothing untoward like this ever happened? Have people not read the pedopocracy? Have they not heard about the Franklin scandal and Marc Dutroux, Holly Grieg and many others? Are there so many out there so innocent of knowledge? After all this time? How do they manage to avoid the truth so assiduously?

The people who deny the horrific child abuse -- the perpetrators, the scale and horror -- are either hopelessly naive or participating in the cover up. For those who have lifted up the rock and peeked underneath, we know that people like Savile and Sandusky are perfectly consistent with organized crime rings that enlist many, many people in positions of power at the core, along with the countless disposable scumbags on the periphery.

People get away with their crimes because they belong to the crime ring. We live inside the crime ring. The criminals run the asylum. HOW ELSE could organized crime, TCOs (wink wink), be so huge, and so unstoppable, unless they involved many highly placed people in the media, judiciary, military, police, social services, intelligence agencies, customs, corporations, finance, and religions? Of course they also overrun the internet, working from large and well-funded sites doing limited hangouts 24x7 to the lowly trolls and bloggers on the payroll, poisoning the well and misleading people in small ways just as fast as they can. The internet has really become not much different than teevee anymore. One thousand channels but nothing much to see... just millions of people pulled into cul de sacs of pointlessness.

Look at this piece of shit, for instance. 

"A troll exploits social dynamics like computer hackers exploit security loopholes, and Violentacrez calmly exploited the Reddit hive mind's powerful outrage machine and free speech values at the same time."

In other words, he's a sociopath, and he was ALLOWED to do all manner of vile things, exploitative things, because he was good at it, and because we live in the social engineering laboratory where humans are studied and experimented on 24x7x365. On the internet especially, despicable people are VALUED for their ability to create chaos and division. That's considered a skill. People LIKE it.

Michael Brutsch helpfully created a "safe space" on reddit for pedophiles. That's so nice. Of course, he knows the people who run reddit so it's ok. Reddit has 3.4 billion pageviews a month, or so. We guess the authorities maybe keep track of things that happen there? On boards that Brutsch hosted like chokeabitch, niggerjailbait, rapebait, hitler, jewmerica, misogyny, incest? 

Do people post the vilest things, safe in their anonymity from you the other reader, when the authorities can track anyone down at any time? So who are they afraid of? The authorities? We think not. You know we bet if he had a subreddit on sensitive military technology that would be a different story. That's *serious.* But he was only doing pedophilia and so forth. So.....No problem with the authorities?

Michael Brutsch
The problem was, he explained, that if his identity got out, his many enemies would start attaching lies to his name because they simply don't like his views. They would say he was a child pornographer, when all he had done was spearhead the distribution of thousands of legal photos of underage girls. They would say the fact that he created a subreddit dedicated to Hitler meant he was anti-Semitic, when really it was just trolling. (Brutsch says he's got Jewish blood himself: "If you see a picture of me, I'm about as Jewish looking as they get.") They would Google-bomb his name and the word "pedophile" along with his publicly-traded company's name.  He needed to keep his anonymity to protect his ability to express things many people think but hardly anyone says.
Let's get his reasoning straight then. The PROBLEM is that he's a pig and pervert, and he's a Jew also, Which Doesn't Matter But Really, Who Could Have Imagined, and just because he has dedicated untold hours of his life to being a disgusting pig online and riling people up on purpose, because he enjoys doing that and as a matter of fact he is Top Fucking Talent in that department, well just because all that might be totally true, he does not want to bear any unpleasant consequences of any of that, so he needs to be ANONYMOUS from the other readers. Because he might be a connoisseur of child pornography?,  but that doesn't mean he's an actual child pornographer himself. True. And he might like to piss and moan about the Jews, anonymously of course because it gets people riled up and could get some of them on some watch lists or something, so he's perhaps a bit of a dilettante in so-called "anti-semitism?", but that doesn't mean he's anti-semitic since he very obviously gets an A+++ in Talmudic Judaism, whether he considers himself one or not. True. And anyway, according to Brutsch, he is just one of many other filthy perverts hanging around out there and it's all about freedom of speech so that miscreants can enjoy themselves anonymously without fear of consequences. True.

And again, who are they actually ANONYMOUS FROM? When anyone wants to remain anonymous on the web, who are they really keeping anonymous from? Not the authorities. Everyone BUT the authorities. So let's think about this. Who is dangerous to skeevy people on the web? The authorities? APPARENTLY NOT. They worry about being found out by neighbors, coworkers, friends, etc. You know, the people who could actually make their lives miserable.

Because, seems to us, if there were some authorities out there who were serious about stopping pedophiles, they could just bypass all that pesky privacy bullshit that they already bypass whenever they feel like it, since 911 changed everything and the NSA collects every speck of data every email phone call every breath you take if they think you might be a terrorist, even though they know all the terrorists because they are all on the payroll, they WHY PRAY TELL doesn't the bypass-your-rights door ever swing the other way, like when there's a fucking predator pedophile or a million of them, who are out there swapping their filthy abusive loot with each other? Why does the RULE OF LAW only come into play when the criminals need it for protection? If meantime the NSA and corporations are collecting data on E V E R Y O N E, for what reason did we sacrifice our privacy, if we can't even expect pedophiles to be stopped in the bargain???

All that Changing Everything certainly was a great deal for the criminals.

It's all a big joke. The whole thing. The whole pretense about the elections and the law and the constitution and the global warming, the war on drugs, and the war on terror. Et cetera. Democrats and republicans. All of it, Total Bullshit.

Social media. The ultimate joke. Facebook then? Totally helpless we guess when it came to stopping the cruelty against Amanda Todd, for example? Look at how this case evolves. Anonymous, cointelpro, steps in to hack their way through to the guy who blackmailed Amanda Todd? Really?? Is that necessary because the authorities and the NSA and so forth can't figure it out with the unlimited data they collect on everyone? They just can't figure it out, find the guy? Hmm. It looks like just another limited hangout. Put some low level asshole on the hook, call it a day, and let the other people upstream get back to their vile amusements.
These Daily Capper videos go through many other stories that revolve around subjects, mostly young girls, who have been tormented and manipulated sexually via the internet. They discuss the stories as if they are popular knowledge, which implies that there is an informed audience who follow these sick extortion-dramas. http://www.vice.com/read/tracing-kody-maxson-the-online-blackmailer-alleged-to-have-tormented-amanda-todd
Yes, indeed. It DOES IMPLY that there is an informed audience who follow these sick extortion dramas. There IS INDEED an informed audience and despite the FACT that there is no privacy whatsoever, for anyone, these people certainly do seem to get away with sick extortion dramas, without consequence. Why is that my friends? How can this be?? If we have an NSA and fusion centers tracking everything, do you see that all this frustration over catching the criminals is a big show for the gullible? Why else would poor Kody Maxson, award-winning pedophile blackmailer, say he feels "betrayed"? All this time he has been allowed to do these vile things and be rewarded with pats on the back for his TOP TALENT in blackmailing his victims, and now all of a sudden he is in trouble?? You can imagine his frustration that people are pointing the finger at him.
“If I was a tormentor I’d be in police custody,” he said, adding he’s “really pissed off and annoyed” that people are pointing the finger at him. “None of it’s true. I’m feeling betrayed.” http://www.vancouversun.com/news/denies+harassing+Amanda+Todd+RCMP+allegations+unfounded/7400309/story.html
Really? Would he really be in police custody... in VANCOUVER? We kind of doubt it, considering that Vancouver is a huge human trafficking hub, something the police there would surely be aware of.

From Dave McGowan's Sleazefest in Seattle:

And it gets better. According to far more shocking allegations (http://www.galacticfriends.com/updates/galactic-friends/1784-galactic-federation.html), there is no shortage of other unsavory freight being shipped through Vancouver, including illegal drugs and weapons, and, perhaps inevitably, child pornography. According to witness statements taken from social workers, tribal elders and self-described victims, Vancouver is home to a protected network of pedophiles engaged in such pursuits as rape, torture, murder, child pornography, production of snuff films, and ethnic cleansing. Other then all that though, it seems like a great place to hold the Olympic games, especially since, as Perrin noted, “Traffickers will view the 2010 Olympics as the biggest business opportunity for them in decades.”

The network is said to be protected by virtually all levels of law enforcement and the judiciary, as well as by well-placed confederates in the church, the media, and other institutions of the state. If all of that sounds all too familiar, it is probably because you’ve spent time swimming in the sewers of the Franklin case in Omaha, Nebraska (http://franklinscandal.com/), or possibly the Marc Dutroux case in Belgium (http://www.illuminati-news.com/0/snuff2.htm).

From the galactic friends link:


1. An organized system of abduction, exploitation, torture and murder of large numbers of women and children appears to exist on Canada ’s west coast, and is operated and protected in part by sectors of the RCMP, the Vancouver Police Department (VPD), the judiciary, and members of the British Columbia government and federal government of Canada , including the Canadian military.

2. This system is highly funded and linked to criminal organizations including the Hell’s Angels, the Hong Kong Triad, and unnamed individual “free lance” mobsters from Vancouver and the USA . It is funded in part by a massive drug trade, with which it is intimately connected.

3. This system is decades-old and has been supplied for many years with women and children from aboriginal reserves and residential schools, with the paid collusion of lawyers, clergy and officials of the Roman Catholic, Anglican and United Church of Canada, along with state-funded aboriginal leaders and officials of the Department of Indian Affairs.

4. This system is international in scope, Vancouver being one spoke in a wheel of pedophilia, sex slavery, human organ black markets, “snuff” films and violent child pornography that has outlets throughout the Pacific Rim world, particularly in China and Thailand.

5. This system relies upon a network of complicity extending to the highest levels of power in Canada and other nations, involving coroners, judges, doctors, clergy, politicians and social workers, as well as the media. It also relies upon a network of “body dumping grounds” and mass graves, located in remote rural areas or on aboriginal reserves and both church and Crown land, where human remains are regularly disposed of by RCMP officers.

6. This system is kept in place because of a practice and philosophy of tolerance and protection by the established police, judicial, military, church and governmental institutions in Canada and elsewhere. The crimes committed by individual officers of the police, churches, court and government against women and children caught in this system are known and tolerated by these institutions.

Also see old TB posts regarding Vancouver.

We won't belabor it. That's the reality. Either you know it by now or you don't.

Where's the evidence? You have to ask the authorities. The authorities say there is no evidence? YES. OF COURSE THEY WOULD SAY THAT. That's the point.
And turns out, Savile was very highly connected and like Sandusky and his boy-grooming foundation The Second Mile, this goes way deeper. But someone has to put a firewall up and protect the bigger criminals upstream, and that's the job of the media. After all, the people in the media have played along with all this corruption for decades. They are part of the criminals upstream. They have so much blood on their hands, and they are certainly going to help run the Limited Hangout putting guys like Savile and Sandusky on the hook and through the grinder, and then they we are all going to brush our hands together and say PHEW!?! We got those fuckers?!? Glad that's over huh??? So what were you saying darling do you need a fresh scotch?

No. No we are not doing that. The pedophile angle, the harm against children, is the fuse that blows open the death cult. Not looking for a limited hangout here. Looking for the full list of names.

And why do these limited hangouts seem to work so well?

Switters sent me this link about the social engineers.

Why are Americans so easy to manipulate?

Summary: "Behavior modification techniques excite authoritarians." People who rise to power love controlling other people. So they created a society of people who are easy to control. 

And they always practice and perfect their methods. They use facebook and reddit and twitter and the internet for their FEEDBACK LOOPS, to see how they're doing. They use teevee for their programming. In order to debase human beings they put as much garbage out there as they can possibly get away with, and they they watch what the poor debased humans do using the feedback loops.

And that is why a despicable reddit troll can be known to the reddit management, and openly encourage pedophilia, and point to the debased teevee and music industry as his defense, and then have countless people rush to his defense because they consider it all an attack on their freedom of speech and privacy rights. Because all of that satisfies the social engineers.

People really want to be free to be pieces of shit. That's their right, and they will fight for it.

Understand, there is no privacy. Private corporations and the NSA have collected everything. There are no secrets.


They do not stop the criminal activity. They trot out the Rule of Law and all sorts of phony excuses why it is Too Hard to stop the criminals.


The social engineers created what they wanted to create.

They created a society of depraved, mindless, soulless, controllable sex obsessed zombies. They know where they are, and they let them do their thing. Once in a while they have to take one down to keep it looking legit. But they don't care about all the lives being destroyed. A death cult doesn't care about people's lives. They flooded drugs into countless communities. They murdered countless people, dumped their bodies God knows where. They bought off countless people. Bought them off or blackmailed them with the proceeds of the organized crime activities. They promoted the vilest sociopaths to positions of power to make this all possible. Started wars. Murdered more innocent people. Over and over and over again. Their media whores lied for them to keep it covered up. When people tried to tell what happened, they were destroyed.

This is what they wanted, and this is what we have. People complied with it, whether they realized it or not.


All those who don't like this world need to stop cooperating with the criminally insane.

Like, immediately.

In the mid-1970s, as an intern on a locked ward in a state psychiatric hospital, I first experienced one of behavior modification’s staple techniques, the “token economy.” And that’s where I also discovered that anti-authoritarians try their best to resist behavior modification. George was a severely depressed anti-authoritarian who refused to talk to staff, but for some reason, chose me to shoot pool with. My boss, a clinical psychologist, spotted my interaction with George, and told me that I should give him a token—a cigarette—to reward his “prosocial behavior.” I fought it, trying to explain that I was 20 and George was 50, and this would be humiliating. But my boss subtly threatened to kick me off the ward. So, I asked George what I should do.
George, fighting the zombifying effects of his heavy medication, grinned and said, “We'll win. Let me have the cigarette.” In full view of staff, George took the cigarette and then placed it into the shirt pocket of another patient, and then looked at the staff shaking his head in contempt.
Unlike Skinner, George was not “beyond freedom and dignity.” Anti-authoritarians such as George—who don’t take seriously the rewards and punishments of control-freak authorities—deprive authoritarian ideologies such as behavior modification from total domination.

People are depending on it.

legal mumbo jumbo

Disclaimer: The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.

Fair Use: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.