Skip to main content

a possible scenario - with updates

"Albert Pike is to Freemasonry what Shakespeare is to Drama."
 ~ From the way-back machine.

Further from the same link:

First they eliminate all "documents" - not that a oral secret society such as Freemasonry or the KKK keeps a paper trail. Then they say no documents exist or none can be found. [See: exposure, no evidence, plenty of evidence] If there is any eyewitness testimony included in books or writings on the topic they deny the books or writings exist, if that fails they attack the witnesses and try and destroy their character - even if they were masons and thereby ignoring their oaths on the matter, and if that fails they attack the character of the authors themselves - again if they also too were masons. Finally they will simply lie or mischaracterize the nature of a book or writing by terming it 'anti' - even if the work was 'pro' but written in another time before the fall of the KKK. The use of the term "anti" is one of pure Orwellian rhetoric. All those who write critically of Freemasonry are anti's and all anti's are frauds, liars, zealots, or extremists and cannot be accepted. Therefore there is no such thing as a legitimate work criticizing Freemasonry because by it's very nature it must be 'anti' and organized Freemasonry will accept no references from 'anti's' in any debate or discussion of Freemasonry.
Something we have noted before...
It is very important in particular to note the importance of EVIDENCE, or LACK OF EVIDENCE. We have noted this many times, how people demand PROOF of various allegations....How easy is it to make the evidence go away? It's very easy when organized crime has at it's service the military, the media, and people highly placed in governments and bodies throughout the world. ~ exposure

Freemasory is Judaism for gentiles.

Masonic monument in Israel

Albert Pike was the head of the supreme council of freemasonry starting in 1859, for 32 years. He wrote a letter dated 8/15/1871 laying out the three world wars required to bring about the One World Order. If you have never read about this letter, we will leave it to you to click through and read about it. His predictions for WWI and WWII are accurate, or perhaps we can more accurately say that events transpired according to his direction.

His instructions for WWIII:
"The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time."

Pike... putting world events in context since 1871...? [UPDATE: Maybe not. See Aangirfan's latest post and also here, debunking the Pike letter as cited.]

Step one: Destroy Israel and Islam. Well we see Islamic countries getting destroyed one by one, but so far Israel has escaped destruction. War with neighbors Syria and Lebanon will not leave Israel untouched. That much has been promised. Picking a war with Iran, that Israel cannot execute alone, will not leave Israel untouched.

Inexplicably, Netanyahu never stops trying to pick wars that will get Israel destroyed unless Team NATO steps in.

And yet we hear from multiple corporate media sources that the big players of Team NATO have supposedly warned Israel to stand down or go it alone. So they have been told. If Israel starts something, ALLEGEDLY, if we are to believe these reports, their "friends" in Team NATO will not pull their obnoxious asses out of the fire. And Israel would be destroyed...? Seems hard to believe, but then again, looking at the Pike instructions, which have already been followed for two world wars...we can't be too sure.

General Dempsey with Obama

Meantime, Iran's nuclear weapons are a false pretext, as anyone paying attention has known for years. This is really about MONEY. The money woes drive the timetable. The people in power need to retain control over the world populations via currencies. That requires control over oil. Oil = petrodollars = control. The alleged nuclear targets in Iran are probably oilfields and production facilities.

Iran was among the few nations to have escaped this global privatization scheme. Iran had its own oil. It managed to avoid the trap of letting its currency be devalued by speculators by imposing foreign exchange restrictions and price controls on its national currency (the rial), something it could afford to do because it had adequate foreign exchange reserves from its oil sales....Islamic scholars have been seeking to devise a global banking system that would serve as an alternative to the usury-based scheme now in control internationally, and Iran has led the way in devising that model. Iran is characterized as a democratic Islamic republic, which enforces Islamic principles not only morally but legally and politically. ~ Ellen Brown, Behind the Drums of War with Iran: Nuclear Weapons or Compound Interest, 11/13/2007

Iranian oil fields

Meantime, options are rapidly running out for the fed. So this whole business about swinging from one vine to the next without falling (the Tarzan Principle, explained by James), ie: collapsing the currency on cue and unrolling a new currency, also on cue, and controlling both major events under cover of some geopolitical catastrophe such as a manufactured war, really poses a challenge to the evil people who currently rule the world. We figure they have been wanting to pull this off for years now, and for various reasons they just can't get all the vines lined up. [UPDATE  - The fed has pulled the trigger on QE3. The countdown begins.]

So, war conditioning continues apace. We see the ridiculous over-reaction to the alleged killing of a diplomat in Libya: US warships entering the area. It's one thing for Team NATO + Israel to literally destroy Libya and murder tens of thousands of innocent people, and kill their leader, and install terrorists for a government -- all of that is Perfectly OK. But when an American diplomat dies, it's an act of war and an outrageous Breach of our SOVEREIGNTY. [UPDATE: A Jim Stone report into the matter reveals that there IS NO official US Embassy in Benghazi. Was the whole thing made up out of whole cloth as a pretext to move warships off the coast and get special teams on the ground? Are the photos from one of the sets used to create news? We cannot find a single image of this supposed Benghazi embassy from before the attack. Well anyway, don't expect the warships to be called back.]

[UPDATE: Obama skipped all his PDB (daily intelligence briefings) in the week leading up to the attack. Goes with the unheeded warnings 48 hours before. Hmm. Shades of GWB before 9/11... who could have imagined blah blah blah...]

kiss kiss hug hug

“Instead, when our grounds are being attacked and being breached, the first response of the United States must be outrage at the breach of the sovereignty of our nation.”  ~ Romney

Riiiight. Anyway, what we think the message oozing out of corporate media will shape up to be after some massaging: poor innocent Americans caught between crazy Jews (like the Jewish Israeli American with 100 Jewish donors who made the film) and crazy Muslims (like the crazies who supposedly freaked out about it, months later, on cue)...? The pushback against Israel -- expected and deserved -- has been woven into the dialectic. [UPDATE -- Check out the micro-expressions on Victoria Nuland as a journalist actually challenges her to explain the difference between public and private diplomacy over Iran.]

See: Aangirfan and one of the source documents here:

Reportedly, the Neocon faction (Romney, Netanyahu) gains from the attack on the US consulate in Libya.

Reportedly, the Trilateral faction (Rockefeller, Brzezinski, Obama) loses.

"From the very execution of this false flag in this particular manner we can lean that the Neocon faction seems to be gaining the upper hand from the trilaterals in the power struggle over who controls the rogue network - deep state apparatus...
In our opinion, "National Security" has traditionally been an issue of advantage for the Republicans. When we see "National Security" threatened, we expect the Republican to gain traction. We agree with the analysis that the events strengthen Romney, despite his idiotic remarks. Since when has being an idiot precluded election to president? [UPDATE: Romney's key foreign policy advisors: Rich Williamson, former aide to John McCain; Missouri Senator Jim Talent; John McCain; Dan Senor; Condoleeza Rice; Jim Baker; Mitchell Reiss (source)]


This leads into a hypothetical scenario, Step One, whereby something very bad happens in the Middle East, involving Israel, Syria and probably Lebanon, and then events are fortuitously prevented from becoming all out war, thanks to the great restraint of generals in the US, Russia and China. They have hinted as much. This leads into Step Two.

Step Two: Provoking a Formidable Social Cataclysm. Most of the world finds themselves very grateful not to be vaporized. Grateful to the military, not to politicians. Nonetheless, the brinksmanship and terror of this conflict spreading into global war easily causes enough chaos to quickly take down the petrodollar. Since the fed needs to be replaced by another power of different name but same function, we see this as the actual goal of the entire geopolitical operation. The economic distress paves the way for the new world currency, presumably to be backed by gold. Who has a lot of gold? Reportedly, China. With the worst crisis -- global nuclear war -- averted, there is plenty left to fight about: Israel's destruction. The Arab World's destruction. The United State's destruction. The economy's destruction. What kind of New World should we have, with what kind of currency, ETC. Stress & relief, stress & relief, stress & relief. In other words, expect "a formidable social cataclysm."

And, we should add, timing is everything. Does a war go down before the election or after? Who makes that decision? People in the deep state. Who controls the apparatus of the deep state? That is the question.

After some time of horror, with many people dying, the banksters hope we end up with a new world currency. The banksters want to restart their clock with the new gold-backed currency -- the names and players all having changed but nothing having actually changed in terms of control.

(Also see: pony business)

Catch 22, also known here as WIN WIN.

How do the people of the world avoid this type of outcome?

final pic: note the guy with the RED BEARD in Bangladesh
A calling card?


Anonymous said…
I think the only way to avoid this type of outcome is exposure. If enough people know, maybe they can be brought together to fight it. I had an idea for a national TV station, where each citizen is given an hour of airtime, chosen by lottery, to do with as they please. Air a documntary, sell it to another party, sell it to advertisers, do a one hour news broadcast, etc. I mean, they ARE the public airwaves, right?

But seriously, I'm not a violent man, but I can't say that I'd mind seeing a few individuals dance at the end of a rope. Could inspire someone on the inside to come clean and expose the power structure, bodies buried, etc.
A. Peasant said…
hi swits,
hey i like your teevee idea. they are the public airwaves, and the control over them has been stolen from the public.

as for the people on the end of ropes, and speaking of airwaves, i feel that the media talking heads are in many respects the most deserving of such treatment. to sell out so many people for so little, it's really something that only a certain type of scumbag can do. they are among the most despicable people on earth. it's a wonder that blood doesn't actually drip off their teeth while they sit there lying to the world.
Anonymous said…
get the mug shots of the CURRENCY PRINTERS - THE OWNERS OF THE MEDIA - all the crackwhores in CONgress accepting "FUNDS" from the TERRORISTS [AIPAC/ADL]...

armed with the mug shots of the traitors to TRUTH and Justice...

do what any rational man would do when a RABID DOG is mauling their child....

we are not all the same, we are not all equal...some have more responsibility and Honor that bloated psychophants watching talmudvision are incapable of doing, even rudimentary activities to mitigate the effects of a lifetime of BAD habits...

See Also in Mackey's Encyclopedia of Freemasonry [1924] or before...

the words Assassin, Babylon & Captivity....

Eustace Mullins - Rape of Justice, World Order, and the Curse of Canaan
Anonymous said…
When I see the various talking heads on teevee, or hear certain ones on the radio, I don't think of them as "Anderson Cooper", or "Rachel Maddow"...I view them differently, in a more appropriate (I believe) way. To me, they are Lt. Maddow, 6th Psychological Team, 4th Division. ... or Corporal Cooper, 2nd PsyOp Battallion, etc... These people are using techniques on the American people that individuals in the armed forces (and various think tanks, I'm sure) use on other countries. It seems like the American intellect is as under attack from within as foreign civilians are under attack from foreign (US) enemies.

It seems that Americans have lost control of their government.
A. Peasant said…
yes, they are trained social engineers and we have been under constant psychological attack through the media for a long time.
A. Peasant said…

that's a link to the Mackey's Encyclopedia referenced by anonymous @ 8:14, if anyone wants to look up the terms.
Penny said…
Hey AP

I saw the insanity of Qe3 was launched.

Look for a giant spike in food prices, here, in North America

Combine the $$$ to the banks, the drought and you have speculation to make money on the commodities market

This is what happened in the lead up to Egypt etc

Only now, the NA citizens are going to get hit.

I shriek to all who will listen to me, when I am on my soap box, that everyday each one of must be aware of the choices we make and the effects on us as individuals and as a society

But the vast majority of the people just go along, corralled to the slaughterhouse by the elites.

Instead of actively considering their choices, their options and seizing upon the opportunities in them

I have long advocated tossing the tv. Using cash. shopping local.
Using cash is imperative if we want to keep our freedom!!

Keep big business and banks out of your life as much as possible

If every one of us lived mindfully, cognizant of the real powers we actually all have... what a different world we would have

It amazes me how people have been manipulated to act against their best interests


james said…
"I have long advocated tossing the tv. Using cash. shopping local.
Using cash is imperative if we want to keep our freedom!!

Keep big business and banks out of your life as much as possible

If every one of us lived mindfully, cognizant of the real powers we actually all have... what a different world we would have"

Absolutely, Penny!!
james said…
Thanks for the link-overs, Apea. I should perhaps explain for some readers how gold and oil work together to bring about the One World Currency.

The OWC, if it ever gets off the ground, will be sold to the public as being 'backed by gold' implying that this OWC can be readily exchanged for gold. This will have appeal for some but not all. Crucially, there is no need for gold to run an economy as the last decades since the gold standard has been abandoned have proved conclusively.

Some people may argue that a currency and therefore an economy works better for being 'backed by gold' but what cannot be argued is that it is necessary. It clearly is not. So people and governments will be free to do without a OWC should the bankers attempt to foist it upon us.

For a OWC to 'work' for the bankers, there needs to be an imperative – a 'stick' as well as a 'carrot'. Coercion, in other words. This is where oil comes in. If the only way you can buy oil is with the band spanking new OWC, then everyone HAS to have it.

So that's the game – denominate all oil sales in the new OWC while advertising it as being backed by gold when, in fact, it is really being backed (or enforced) by oil. But to make all that work, the bankers need to control all the worlds oil sales and they don't . . . . so far.

Iran, Syria and Russia being notable 'hold-outs'
james said…
For some amazing (surreal) figures on "Quantitative Easing" see NJT's post here
A. Peasant said…
hi Pen and James,
Penny, i also absolutely agree about the teevee, shopping locally, and using cash. it is really not rocket science. seems like most people think that some unspecified "other people" should do these things, because it's too inconvenient for them to do it, for their XYZ reasons. and that's the problem. people need to stop waiting for other people and man up (woman up) themselves.

James, thank you for explaining the connection between the gold standard and petrodollar. i knew i was missing something, but sense that the gold standard has some psychological throwback benefit which needs to be exploited for the masses. actually, Zahir Ebrahim, who is in Pakistan, has sent me this link about the gold standard and Ron Paul, but i have not had a chance to read it yet.

though it brings up our writings on RP. i am thinking he must be getting ready for his role taking the fed out to the curb soon...
freethinker said…
Some graphics to put a scale on those insane financial figures:
World Dept
A. Peasant said…
wow freethinker, those are some eye-popping graphics!

related, i don't know if you ever read the geronimo manifesto on credit default swaps. i've linked to it a bunch of times. very unfortunately, the blog has been removed, but i did put a big snip of it in this post:
freethinker said…
Yup, how did these 'financial instruments' ever get to be legal. Its like being able to take out life insurance on your bank manager then getting a bank loan to pay a hit-man to bump-off your bank manager. What's not to like about that ;) Sheer insanity of course.
A. Peasant said…
HAhaha, that's a good analogy!
Peter said…
Economics makes my head swim.
The graphics help alot and the bank manager thing also helps.
AP, I wanna try to understand your factional thingy.
The only factionalism I am able to see is Hitlery and Obama. There I see a keeping friends close and enemies closer. Obama , the Anglo American establishment is riding a bucking bronco, (Hitlery's one time up and coming middle class Bonapartists) who are the warmiongers. The old Anglo American establishment riding on their greed and ambitions to benefit from their adventurisms abroad.
My bet is, Steven's is Hitlery's boy.
A. Peasant said…
ok, i can see that. i am not sure i can clearly articulate what i think is going on either, but i'll try.

this started with me trying to figure out whether china and russia are really going to hold the line with syria, or if they will cave and let syria be destroyed.

then we start seeing a rift between china and russia. seems to me from past research that china made a deal with the banksters. that could lead to russia putting some distance between them, if russia does not have a deal for the future pecking order. just me sussing here obviously. bottom line is the rift helps team nato + israel because it increases the chances that syria will be destroyed if china and russia don't hold together. it's a wedge. russia is damned if they do and damned if they don't, which seems to be the usual position of russia.

are you with me so far?
Anonymous said…
Many thanks for the link.

- Aangirfan
Peter said…
go on
our info is soo imperfect
China is very complex. Banksters control the urban elements but the real power in China resides in the hinterland. Hong Kong would have remained in UK hands if the banksters had real power.
Mao really shut the outside world out from my understanding. Of course , again, my info is very shakey as is most everyone elses.
The Shanghai skyline is truly magnificent one wonders how China has become soo powerful.
I seee many parallels with China shutting out the west and Iran shutting out the west. me thinks China and Iran have some special relationship based on this.
The "west' realizes Russia has the winning hand vis a vis natural resources. This is the reason the west is in panic mode,
anyway, continue with what u r saying
Peter said…
@ freethinker
quite honestly as a Puritan this info you provided at "Puritans more jewish then protestants" is poppycock
(amazing Anglican (crowned bloodsucker) propaganda)
my education has been woefully sabotaged to adequately counter the arguement Fogelman posits
All I can say is, deep in my heart i feeel it is deviously manipulated by old world european sophisticates.
I trust an early 19th century text that was my great great grandfathers, an Anabaptist preacher which tells a tale that is in grosss conflict with this Fogelman document. No one knows anything about the memory holed history of the Waldensian and Albigenses. The original Puritans (Cathari another word for Puritans) Nowhere is mention of jewish banksters.
I fear i am getting into a pisssing contest with a skunk.
soo hit me with what ya got i can take it
A. Peasant said…
The "west' realizes Russia has the winning hand vis a vis natural resources.

absolutely. the west would like to bring russia into orbit, control those resources. same as iran. as russia is primarily landlocked, the military has limited options so they need to go in for these destabilizations on the perimeter and hope to drive a spear in that way.

China, agreed it is very hard to understand what is going on in China. this Bo murder case for instance. i think trying to follow chinese power politics is a full time pursuit and i wouldn't even venture a guess. BUT we know that there is some special relationship with israel, as we have covered it in depth here and just recently some chinese navy boats visited israel, like just a couple of weeks ago. formal visit. and we had some discussion in one of the comment threads here about a face off between china and israel, and if those two were going to fight it out for Best Ancient Civilization, china would prolly win since they didn't steal a history like the other clowns. (

a whole other vector here with the habiru, etc.... we digress!)

also, soros came right out and said that china would be the economic engine to replace the US in the world economy.

It looks like a pretty simple equation.

from the post parasites on the move:

so again, we see that there is a division of labor / tasks, where the US will need to be mainly a military establishment in the NWO. the money power will move to china.

so long story short, we still think Russia has the cleanest anti-Team Nato + Israel position, of the two (russia and china). of course that puts russia squarely in the dialectic also. we wonder, what is russia's role in the NWO, post-synthesis? gas station attendant? we think russia might not be down with this.

are you still with me?
A. Peasant said…
and btw no fighting please, keep it clean, thanks.
A. Peasant said…
i'm going to keep going Peter, as i just read an interesting comment over at Aan's, about Gordon Duff. a snip:

Duff acts as a honey trap, but he supports world governance in the Trilateral faction as opposed to the neocon faction.

Trilateralists see Israel as an obstacle to world governance, while the neocon faction see Israel as central to their world governance schemes, if not its leader with a Greater Israel at the pinnicle, yes, top neocons see a Greater Israel as the most powerful country in the world in 50 years time (and they know it can't be achieved without a Greater Israel).

Not that trilateralists want Israel destroyed, they just see it as being an obstacle that must take a back seat to their larger plans.

Yes, there are factions in the Elite.

i do not know who that person is, but that is pretty much my suss of the situation also, from what i can tell.

now, where it gets interesting is the craziness of netanyahu and his willingness to lead israel into the lion's jaws. maybe bibi thinks that if something horrible happens to poor israel, then the world will REALLY, REALLY, REALLY owe the jews. for serious this time. and just like after japan was destroyed, then what happened? macarthur rebuilt it better than before. so there could be some thinking like that going on, ie: that some degree of destruction is the route to greater israel. the victim mentality. in which case, the people who consider israel an obstacle might want to go along with the takedown but just not agree to the subsequent rebuild, and in that way the trilaterals would win in the long run. but they would let the neocons and bibi have their way first in the short run, because the neocons would play that sort of bet, that they could cynically sacrifice a bunch of israelis (and syrians, lebanese, palestinians, etc.), and somehow make lemonade out of it.

you know i wish i could shower my brain after thinking these thoughts; but that's how when i look at the situation with romney and obama, i do not see a done deal for obama. i think the neocons want to play this card and i think the military might want them too also, because the military would end up as heroes in the end. presumably.

and going back to question of russia, and what will russia do? an interesting article here today in the spooky asia times:

putin giving obama one last chance to avert escalating the situation?
Peter said…
I don't see China that close to Israel. Again, sweeping generalizations here.
Israel and India have alot goin' on . While India and China are traditional antagonists . Soo the China Israel thing is hard to swollow.
Behind all these strange alliances and antagonisms is some hidden hand.
Pakistan supposedly got it's nuclear capability from China, How convenient. That Sub continent a major player can't exclude it in the mix.
China, IMHO is firmly ensconced behind the Muslim world more so then Russia.
Anonymous said…
Hi there peasant :-)

FYI, "Ambassador" J. Christopher Stevens is said (per internet reports) to have been a teacher in Morocco for two years. This would contradict the unclassified phone directory of the US Dept of State valid as of 17 JAN 2012 which was published on Cryptome as "0063.pdf". There, you find the following entry on page 54:

Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation
Multilateral Nuclear and Security Affairs (ISN/MNSA)
Director J. Christopher Stevens 2139

To me that looks like somebody several floors below top command, a head of dept. but still nobody taking any kind of big decisions.

What gives?

The US "Embassy" in Libya is probably just a "mission" - it is variously described as a "consulate", what means that it was/is the diplomatic mission to the terrorists who took over the Libya and formalities still need to be fulfilled - last but not least the formal status of the terrorists in power.

Stevens is described as a person who the locals generally liked - see article at Aangirfan for example, what means he was probably expendable as far as the zios were concerned.

This whole thing is Yinon's Plan in execution in my eyes. That the israhelis dont get their war on Iran is probably b/c there are still things not in place as per Pike's plan, whatever they are.

My 3 cents.
A. Peasant said…
Behind all these strange alliances and antagonisms is some hidden hand.

yes, it's called banksters.

put it this way. india and pakistan should be allies. russia and china should be allies. why do these countries not get along as they should in their own national interest? what is the reason they have problems? the hidden hand you mention: interference from outside parties. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. banksters blowing smoke up their asses and making them promises if they only do XYZ. so they listen to the banksters instead of operating out of their simple national interest. and everything gets screwed up.

we don't know the factions in china and which ones will come out on top in the party reset. china seems to be going through some sort of internal attrition at the moment. presumably there is some faction allied to the banksters.

google "beijing consensus ramo"

A. Peasant said…
hi anonymous,
thank you for the info. jeebus how big is the state dept???? btw he is listed on page 39, link here:

Multilateral Nuclear and Security Affairs (ISN/MNSA)
Director J. Christopher Stevens 2139 202-647-9644
Deputy Director M. Scott Davis 2139 202-647-1141

these are the only 2 guys who do this particular thing, and one of them gets killed. hmm. bio on Davis can be found in this doc:

a CSIS nuclear conference in 2010.

with all the weapons moving around, maybe Stevens was the man for the job, making sure the correct rebels got the correct weapons. ??

maybe he was liked and knew too much, per the comment at Aan's. thus he was expendible? it's very hard to say but the pics we have seen i do not believe are of his dead body. however in general the direction of the narrative is that heroes died, and people in O's admin screwed up (neocon version)...? and we're going to get some boots on the ground and make it right. so it seems to be a very useful turn of events for warmongers of all stripes. a big lever moving USS Laboon and USS McFaul.

The Laboon was making a port call in Crete, just a few hours from Libya. The McFaul was outside the Strait of Gibraltar which would place the ship just a few days away from Libya.

both ships equipped with the latest ABM technology and Tomahawk missiles, so they give president option of making a precision strike on the guilty parties, if found. so tempting. that would certainly be a boost for Team O. that's like getting OBL all over again. if that happens then my theory of the neocons winning is toast.

Anonymous said…
Hullo AP,

Apropos Israel, I don't use the word zionists too much since I'm of the opinion that Isreal was only ever a vehicle and a short term one at that. Thinking that it's all about zionism is like thinking that a corporate coup is all about board meetings. Can you dig it?

The point is, a homeland for the Jews was never the final goal. The actual goal is one world government under the twelve families. The families do not now, nor ever had, any desire to live in Israel. Between that God forsake place and Lago di Como why would anyone pick the former? The family's ambitions are infinitely bigger than the SLC.

But it is true that Israel was an important vehicle, so much so that the families made (or fabricated, whatever) a sacrifice of six million jews to get it. This based on the centrality of sacrifice amongst the sabbatean/satanist/demonists who comprise the families. I think that sacrifice a big deal for them - ie. they're really into it, good and proper.

And now Israel, which has served its purpose of bringing war and destruction to the cluster of nations/people that don't subscribe to usury, is spent and in turn to be sacrificed for OWG. Not forgetting of course that with so many land borders Israel was never really militarily defensible, certainly not when their motto has always been 'Amity? Never!' Which is to say, it never had any future that made sense.

Anyway I reckon Israel is to be destroyed/sacrificed and that that the horror of that is to be used as a bludgeon to guilt-trip us into one world government - much like the Germans were guilt-tripped into their own subjugation. The thought will be 'we are terrible people and we deserve it'.

That's not to say that this is the entire strategy. Rather it's merely a tactic, one amongst many. That is, I think Peter is right, at least about the centrality of the role of the means of exchange.

Under this logic, the hell bent rabidness of Netanyahu makes perfect sense. Which is to say, he's a sabbatean pretending to be a zionist and his job isn't to save Israel but to destroy it.

Works for me.

Ciao Ciao.
A. Peasant said…
hi nobs,
well ok i think you and i are in agreement but i don't know about Peter. he's not the one making that argument unless i am reading him wrong... ?
Anonymous said…
Peasant, your right, my wrong. It is page 39 of 45.

You say "only 2 guys to do this ..."
These were the director and the vice-director of that particular dept. There would have to be more people pushing papers and such IMO, as "directors" never do much of anything. That, or I misunderstand bureaucracies or their paper-pushers are classified.

BTW, another name of a killed person in Libya appeared - surnamed Smith - not listed with the DoS, so he was probably some sort of spook or "classified".

And yes, the "Hullo" anon is right, the "jews" are just that, the slaves (or cattle) of the inner sect, and like cattle which has outlived their usefulness they will be shed by their owners.
james said…
I'm with you both. It works for me, too! Especially the bit about sacrifice being central to their thinking and shifting blame and guilt.
There are always two scapegoats - one that is killed and one that carries away the blame and guilt. So it fits
A. Peasant said…
hi anonymous,
right, thank you, that's right about directors etc. so the state dept is even *bigger* than that ridiculous directory. the other three guys are:

"Sean Smith, a Foreign Service information officer, and Tyrone S. Woods and Glen A. Doherty, two former Navy SEALs working as security personnel at the consulate in Benghazi."

"President Barack Obama pledged a nation’s resolve to “dignity and freedom” today as he received and honored the remains of the four Americans killed in the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya."

"The “rage and violence” in Libya was prompted by an Internet video that the American government had nothing to do with, Clinton told the audience. “It is hard for the American people to make sense of that because it is senseless, and it is totally unacceptable,” she said."

americans as innocent victims between the crazies... ?

A. Peasant said…
hi James,
great point about the TWO scapegoats. so if israel gets whacked, scapegoat #1, then we all collectively would be scapegoat #2 for allowing it to happen. and payback is a bitch...
Anonymous said…
Man I love this blog. Don't even feel like I could add anything...this discussion is out of my league. But I do feel like I'm learning, big time, from the speculation. You guys really have your fingers on the pulse of these events. And I'm grateful to be privy to the conversation. -swits
A. Peasant said…
oh swits, this is not out of your league. we're kind of pinging back to discussions and posts that are old, and to be fair we should be putting more links back to the old stuff so people could follow if they wanted to take the time to read all that old stuff. but sadly i never really organized TB with tags or anything, and it's hard enough for me to find anything here, let alone at anyone else's blog. but you're very sweet to follow the meandering comments and i hope we are making some sense! the sabbatean stuff in particular is very important to understanding the mindset under discussion.

zezorro said…
hi sweetie

you absolutely sure about the gold hype?
it may be, or may be not planned
tptb have all the wealth already, amassed through generations
what they are after is a new order, how many times does it take to repeat
new order means new order, currency is secondary, he who rules coins money
it is of no practical importance, what form it takes, the only question is - who controls it
what is fundamental in my opinion are the rules
- the system will be central (IMF, WB, BIS)
- it will be electronical (plastic, chip)
- it will be debt system, i.e. credit, i.e. usury

lollar goes down the drain
freethinker said…
@Peter, "I fear i am getting into a pisssing contest with a skunk", nice.

I've no intention of getting into a pissing contest with you. Do your own research into how and from whom the Puritan Cromwell got the money to militarily defeat the King's army.
A. Peasant said…
Hi zerowaty zorro,
Am i sure? Absolutely not. These people are insane.

I agree they have all the wealth they could possibly need and it is about control. The problem they have is making the switch. They need a certain amount of control to make the switch to total control, and they dont have that and it slips further away from them daily. So they need narratives.

Gold, if used, would be for psychological manipulation of the sheeple. Just as with oil, why are we fighting about it when we could have free energy technology that has been suppressed, and oil is abiotic anyway? They use the designated commodity as a justification for control. It is all a charade.

I suppose they always prefer when the sheeple willingly choose the offered solution because it makes their job easier. I think a lot of people would readily accept a gold backed currency because it was done in the "good old days" therefore it must be good. Something like that. What else was all this hype about gold going on for years if not to condition people that thhey need gold?
A. Peasant said…
I am sorry peter sniped at you. I dont understand the tension over this old detail.
Peter said…
Thank you so much freethinker I will indeed to my own research. OBVIOUSLY, your link to Puritanism being utter and complete Hawg warsh (said with and Indiana twang)
IT is truly Cavalier monarchial High Anglican propa ganda. shame on you for foisting such trash!!
Anonymous said…
Hey AP,

Just briefly: I was a bit confused about your point re the chap with the red beard. I don't know that that's anything special. It's just henna - they rub it in and make their hair red. They've been doing it for hundreds of years as far as I know. It's what stands for a foible in the Muslim world.

And what is Swits on about? Swits, ya big silly, like anyone has a clue? Actually AP is quite clever but me, I just make it up as I go along, ha ha.
A. Peasant said…
Hi nobs,
Well the red hair thing seemed to be a bit of a calling card since the aurura shootings. You know, psyop in your face hahaha sort of thing. Ferris has covered it over in the symbology dept. so i thought it weird that pic. I was wondering if others see that pic as a little staged? It looks perhaps staged to me so thats why i includedit.
Anonymous said…
haven't even had time to read yet and about to run but thought this might be worth review
A. Peasant said…
hi anonymous,
yes thank you. that is the same article that Aan posted debunking the letter. however, the whole thing is sort of like arguing that the protocols are fake, all just a great big elaborate hoax hahahaha, GOTcha! so, going back to the snip i posted at top -- about the evidence and the lack of evidence -- it just becomes very circular.

in the end all we can do is look at the world and look at the people in power, and look at every single town in the USA has a masonic sign on the side of the road when you enter, and so forth and so on. common sense tells us that we have a problem and it's a real problem.

bholanath said…
AP and all - love the discussion, also over my head, but super educational. This is a unique place.
My understanding is that beards and hair are dyed with henna among Muslim men who have gone on the Haj - pilgrimage to Mecca (hence the name 'Hajji'). That's what I was told in India FWIW.
A. Peasant said…
Hi Bho,
Thank you. I know nothing about this custom, clearly ;)... As soon as i saw the guy, in the daily mail, i thought of james holmes and the aurora shootings. They are clearly posing for the photo and look very happy, not upset. And they dont look poor. They look organized.
Anonymous said…
Re beards, I stand corrected. Thanks Bholanath - a thing worth knowing, that.
bholanath said…
AP -
Sorry for 'off topic', but I just heard on the radio that Ken Feinberg the zionist 9/11 claims czar, BP 'spill' claims czar, the Virg. Tech claims czar, is now (surprise!) the new Sandusky claims czar. Breathtaking, eh?
A. Peasant said…
Very interesting! I guess we can tell the scale of the problem based on the experience of the goon in charge of gatekeeping. And this guy feinberg is saved for the biggest coverups... Evidently. Thanks for the tip.
Anonymous said…
Sorry a little off-topic...but a few things I've noticed lately in the mainstream media...namely a couple television shows I've indulged in recently. (mini-spoilers, I suppose)

Continuum - Year is 2078. A group of "terrorists" named "Liber8", consider themselves to be freedom fighters against the Orwellian corporate regime that dominates their time. During sentencing, they detonate a time travel bomb (no kidding!) that teleports them AND a bio-engineered cop back to modern day times. (message seems to be "Liberty is terrorism.")

Revolution - Modern day. For unknown reasons, electricity goes out worldwide and 15 years in the future, still has not been restored. Violent militias (another staple of the liberty movement, minus the violent)control food and citizens live in fear. Guns are outlawed except for use my said militias. (message seems to be "You need us (government) or you'll be dead in a week")

and the kicker, showing on ABC! (Premieres today, but has been available to be seen online for past week, just finished watching)

Last Resort - American nuclear sub Missouri(?) gets orders through secondary channel to nuke Pakistan. (first thought was, our BESTEST ME friends could probably do that!) Captain questions orders, and for that is fired upon by American warships. The American news is blaming Pakistan for the attack upon the Missouri. (How did this one get DoD approval? Your prediction of the military becoming the "saviors" was prescient!). Crew finds tiny island and SHAZAM, a NATO monitoring station to hole up in! (so many unknowns with this one...don't know where to begin...)

Honorable mention - Boardwalk Empire has an episode where a woman miscarries, graphically on the floor, because of...wait for it...drinking RAW MILK! (That favorite pet cause of the Liberty Movement, and something RP even mentioned a couple times in speeches.)

Maybe I'm reading too much into these...but it got me wondering who was producing/writing these? Especially a show like Last Resort...I do you go on a talk show and pimp THAT storyline? Predictive programming? I'd take that bet. There is definitely a pattern enemy being created, slowly, intermittently, through subtle demonizations in their shows. Meh. Fun stuff. I'd love to get your analysis of Last Resort. It's definitely a stress inducer...if you're one of the few Americans that can grasp WHAT that show is doing to the people, besides "entertaining". :-P


A13 said…
HI all, a bit late to the party here but i'm going to go in the deep end and suggest that the next evolvement would be the re ignition of the cancelled "drill" Austere challenge from Jan this year..( drill between US and Isaraeli forces fighting "mock" battle and testing systems blah blah..
I did a couple of posts back then on the so called drill and it was cancelled/suspended until later this year..also agree with nobs re the sabbatean influence and headspace of nuttyyahhoo et al.. a dual attack/ sacrifice dragging Syria down and all with it, (Golan heights an important place) catching like a wildfire thought the m/e nth Africa region incl Egypt and Lebanon..with all of the media soundbites and UN bullshit going down.
BTW i've had a shitload of RECENT pageviews on the monkey looking at the post Austere challenge and my blog posts from the month of Jan 2012..Go figure and visits from Israel at this particular post..more so than others i've written..something is heating up..
This is Jan this year..

Suss or what?

and Pen mentions food prices going up..this is what is on the news NOW..a global food price rise..

BTW I'm all over red rover..but i'll try to pop in when i can xx

Missed you guys :)
A. Peasant said…
Hey swits,
I dont watch teevee much but i did see one of the trailers over at followthe money blog. The electricity outage. At first i thought it was a movie. The fact that these are teevee shows is upping the ante with the programming, seems to me. Tuning in every week for programming as opposed to watching a movie... Seems more serious.

I have no post in the works. Got to wait for the spirit to move me these days. Thevast majority of what i see seemspointless to write about. The people who get it already get it. The people who dont are not going to read it snyway. Situation Grim.
A. Peasant said…
Hullo girlfriend! I see what you mean about the regrettable accident. Certainly too many people have caught on such that it would require some plausibly deniable accident theory like a cyber attack, to deflect the accusations which of course will be immediate, should some attack commence. Everyone knows who wants the war and who has the history of starting wars. So they need a fig leaf.
Anonymous said…
Ben Swann explaining that there was no embassy in Bengazi, and that the "innocence of muslims" film had nothing to do with the death of the ambassador.

Seems to be the point man for truth on teevee nowadays.


Anonymous said…
You know you're ahead of the game when the topic of your post takes 2 weeks to make it to facebook.

I'm not sure if you're able to tell, but I have shared this post (your article) in a couple places.

Side note off topic...great documentary here. (Sorry if previously posted.) PsyWar (Manufacturing Consent through Public Relations/Media -


side side note. Max Igan has made a rare public appearance with Ken O'Keefe in Gaza. I like those fellows. Am I missing info?
A. Peasant said…
Hi swits,
Thanks for aharing the post, though i have not even looked at my stats in weeks so i haveno idea where it goes. The link here

is important for devunking the pike letter though the sentiments expressed are all there as far as freemasorry plans for ruining everything.

I will check out the lonk also, sounds good. I dont know who max igan is so sorry but i am no help there. Or ken okeefe. Are they teevee heads?
Anonymous said…
Started reading and listening to Max Igan a while back, kind of a peace activist/author who used to do 1 hour radio talks regarding war, peace, money, culture. I liked him. His page is here - - and he's got a neat free ebook here -

Ken O'Keefe is an anti-zionist activist. Here's a short clip of how he tends to convey his message. -

I wouldn't call them teevee heads, although occasionally Ken is interviewed on BBC, more often on presstv I think. Igan has been around online for a couple years, but I've just seen him visually for the first time recently, in Gaza.

Just wondering if you or any others had opinions on them. Seem legit.