If you don't know 90% of what's important about this psyop from these four bits of information, you are hopelessly behind in your auto-didactic education about how the world really works. The remaining 10% can be approximately deduced by reading another three or four dozen news articles, most of which will say the same things, except that they will also, strangely, say a few different things; and your task, if you choose to accept it, is to read everything you can get your hands on about this and find all the discrepancies and curiosities, and figure out which ones must be correct by using your google+fu and your very own brain.
There is an opportunity cost to doing this, obviously, because meanwhile, there are lots of other things that you can be doing with your time. Most people will never bother going to this trouble for anything. There are people in the US who have never spent even an hour of their life investigating 9/11, so don't expect them to put any effort into understanding what happened with Wade Page or Syria. Those are the social engineers' favorite people, because they uncritically accept whatever they are told. But if you go through this exercise a few times, and really dig around, you will discover that the terrorists are all on a big payroll funded by your tax dineros as well as the proceeds of organized crime via the so-called black budgets. And the corporate controlled media, which forms a very critical piece of organized crime, shapes the narrative and through its many agents, feeds back information about which discrepancies need to be enhanced or eliminated. And by this method they have sent many, many innocent people to their deaths.
In the case of Wade Page, his unknown motive does not matter to the social engineers. The social engineers want to get as many separate ethnic and religious groups into the fray and fearing the "other" as possible. If the idea is to promote chaos and division, as the social engineers do all over the world, heated debates and never-ending finger-pointing are a win win regardless of the shooter's intentions.
There are over 600 comments on this one story alone in the "global public square." That would be a WIN for the social engineers.
Page did his task and was shot dead. Others take it over from there, including the public. The social engineers use COMPARTMENTALIZATION. Organized crime uses COMPARTMENTALIZATION.
Social Engineers = Organized Crime
We are talking RINGS.
People have certain jobs to do in rings. They don't know what goes on in adjoining rings, or above their pay grade, and generally speaking, THEY DON'T CARE as long as they get their $$$$. That attitude makes the rings go round and round.
Until people start CARING about the truth, nothing will change. Until people realize that doing their task is absolutely NO GUARANTEE that they will survive the chaos they help to bring about, and actually may lead to their own demise, nothing will change.
The TRUTH is that cooperating with the social engineers leads to indiscriminate death.
As for curious details, somehow Page, who had never been seen at the temple before, "seemed like he had a purpose and knew where he was going." He ambushed one of the first officers to arrive. All that military training comes in handy. And naturally, the FBI has taken over the investigation -- that's their task -- because this is a case of "domestic terrorism," even though no motive has been REVEALED. Let the people debate, bread and circuses. That's the people's task -- to watch and argue. The social engineers will watch the conversation in the "global public square" and reveal new information as needed to drive the narrative in whatever direction brings on the desired flavor of fear, as we recently noted with the Miami cannibal narrative.
Speaking of people who just try to "do their jobs" in their compartmentalized lives, ignoring the larger picture and the consequences of helping these grand agendas, because they have to put food on their families like everyone else...or at least have something good on the resume... how about all those people who performed at the opening ceremony of the olympics? Who are these people? They got to act in the ceremonies for the Olympics. EMPLOYMENT. Great stuff. Did not anyone think, during all those rehearsals it must have taken to get these shows together, that some of this stuff was rather creepy? We know, we know, it's just a gig. If you don't take it some other person will. And that is the attitude that has brought countless suffering to the world. Just keep participating and watching and let the world's biggest "harmonically tuned" bell plus assorted visuals stun you into a stupor for easier harvesting. That's your task.
Over in the Bulgaria bombing that Israel blames on Hezbollah, without presenting a shred of evidence, four Israeli witnessess undergo multiple interrogations by the Bulgarian prosecutor's office, as they try to get to the bottom of this. http://www.turkishweekly.net/news/139784/-4-israeli-witnesses-of-burgas-terror-act-interrogated-again.html
The initial lead, purported by Interior Minister, Tsvetan Tsvetanov, was that it has been executed by a suicide bomber, who arrived from abroad. According to observers and terror experts, this lead is looking less and less reliable and the most viable hypothesis is that the perpetrator has been deluded, used as a mule, and has acted under the influence of illegal drugs. Israeli media largely back the above, writing that the young man with light complexion and blue eyes had been blown remotely, while standing between two coaches with Israeli tourists. He had been unaware that he was going to die and had the task to put the explosive on one of the buses. The bomb was placed in his backpack.Aha, so the Israelis at least understand how this works. They have their sayanim networks and the shabbas goyim doing tasks for millennia already. Discrete compartmentalization is culturally understood. He was doing his TASK, his little task in the greater picture. Just a mule, no clue, probably not a Jew either. And how did that work out for him? Oh see, he got blown up by his handlers because he was not aware that he was going to die. He just thought he would do that one little piece and go off with whatever money he had been offered, or maybe they just drugged him up with scopolamine and sent him over there to do it without hope of any reward. But clearly, if he had blue eyes, he is not the same guy whose picture came out the day after the incident, reportedly the brown eyed Mehdi Ghezali, the Algerian-Swedish jihadi who spent time in Guantanamo. http://www.infowars.com/burgas-suicide-bomber-identified-by-media-as-guantanamo-jihadist-video/ His task was to get his picture taken at the airport, looking menacing and harmless at the same time, so that many people who have since moved on from the story will have that bookmarked in their heads. It's wrong, but who cares. As we keep noting, FACTS DON'T MATTER. The narratives change based on some kind of feedback loop managed by the social engineers. They have their people everywhere, doing their tasks, from the top of the media empire (obviously) down to the trolls and plants monitoring every place that thinking people gather, and through the NSA's spying software.
Everyone is doing their task, and where does this bring us? To the gates of hell. Why do people keep cooperating with the social engineers? Because the social engineers have studied people for so long, and they know how to keep them on the reservation. They have the User's Manual for the Bio-Engineered Human Beings of 2012.
We used to know someone who worked at Goldman Sachs. Just a few short years ago, maybe three, this person could not believe that GS could actually be corrupt, because in *her* job, she had to meet exacting standards. So she reasoned that those standards applied from top to bottom. Is this naive for a very intelligent person? Yes. People are naive. Also, no doubt, she made a good salary, which helped her to see the walls of her cubicle as fuzzy little blankets, keeping her warm and dry and safe. No need to peek over the tops.